On Thursday 10 July 2003 01:21 pm, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > This is a RFC on a change to sys_errlist for errno = 0.
> > >
> > > On Linux, if perror() or strerror() is called with errno = 0, the
> > > resulting string is "Su
On Saturday 05 July 2003 08:01 pm, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
>
> Yes, it works now, with these includes:
> ---
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> #include
> #include
> ---
Be
Hi;
I wanted to bring this up a little later but since there is a somewhat related
thread I thought I might as well bring this now. Our default PPPd is extremely
outdated. The version in the distribution is a patched-up version of Paul's PPP
2.3.5 which is maintained now at http://dp.samba.org/ppp
Toni Andjelkovic wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09 2003 (12:45:14 +0300), Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Usually? What does usually mean? I know I can use bpf. But is there
another way to look at incoming TCP packet ? What I did is I sent a TCP
SYN packet and the server answers with a TCP SYN_ACK packet. How c
> You can still test for whether or not it is defined.
>
> #if defined(__FreeBSD__)
> /* Do freebsd-specific stuff */
> #else
> /* Other systems? */
> #endif
*nod* I was just worried about the tests required for Solaris using either
gcc or sun's cc .. looks like
#if defined(sun)
does the t
> have a look at :
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51768
> (sorry I dirt your code :))
> It's *really* dirty :) but it works :-)
It's actually a pretty good hack :-) I actually forgot that I'd run across
this port earlier.
It doesn't link on my system (removed -Bgroup to get it
On Wed, Jul 09 2003 (12:45:14 +0300), Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
> Usually? What does usually mean? I know I can use bpf. But is there
> another way to look at incoming TCP packet ? What I did is I sent a TCP
> SYN packet and the server answers with a TCP SYN_ACK packet. How can I
> look at the SY
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Mosebach, Kai wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:35:23 +0200
> From: "Mosebach, Kai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Julian Elischer' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: Fw: SAPDB FreeBSD Port Anouncement
>
> They do on : http://sapdb.2scale.net/moin.cgi/Supp
Kip Macy wrote:
Usually if your looking at raw packets you want to use BPF.
-Kip
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Hey folks,
I wrote my piece of code to play with, and it uses raw sockets to send
TCP packets. It sends packets okay, everything tested with a sniffer,
everythin
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:12:03PM -0400, Ben Goodwin wrote:
> I'd like to support Sun's cc, however .. so I'm betting that isn't defined
> (I will check) ... I figured that would be available under gcc but assumed
> it wasn't "portable enough" ...
You can still test for whether or not it is d
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:27:21 -0400
"Ben Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys ...
>
> I thought I'd give you a heads-up that I'm porting libnss-mysql to the NSS
> API that FreeBSD 5.1 has adopted in case anyone has input, suggestions,
> wants to test, etc..
> I'm also curious about includ
Usually if your looking at raw packets you want to use BPF.
-Kip
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I wrote my piece of code to play with, and it uses raw sockets to send
> TCP packets. It sends packets okay, everything tested with a sniffer,
> every
Hey folks,
I wrote my piece of code to play with, and it uses raw sockets to send
TCP packets. It sends packets okay, everything tested with a sniffer,
everything is really really fine, but it seems I cannot recvfrom
anything. I mean, it just keeps waiting and doesn't see the reply the
server
I'd like to support Sun's cc, however .. so I'm betting that isn't defined
(I will check) ... I figured that would be available under gcc but assumed
it wasn't "portable enough" ...
And yes, one API would be nice. Each OS has their own :-\
Thanks!
-=| Ben
> You should be able to do:
>
>
Peter Jeremy wrote this message on Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:10 +1000:
> I'm looking at building a fileserver and want to mirror the data
> across two systems (if one fails, I can use the other).
Doh, I should of replied sooner. What you are looking for is probably
Coda. The home page is at: http:
Hi,
Please see http://speedtouch.sourceforge.net/index.php?/news.en.html
"Real" PPPoE with a ethernet card connected with a ADSL Modem works.
This problem is related with ISPs that supports *only* PPPoE protocol
with USB Modems (this case Alcatel) that "emulates" ethernet with
TUN/TAP devices.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:27:21PM -0400, Ben Goodwin wrote:
> Hi guys ...
>
> I thought I'd give you a heads-up that I'm porting libnss-mysql to the NSS
> API that FreeBSD 5.1 has adopted in case anyone has input, suggestions,
> wants to test, etc..
> I'm also curious about including it eventua
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:10:13AM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I'm looking at building a fileserver and want to mirror the data
> across two systems (if one fails, I can use the other).
>
> Consider system A as the server and system B as the mirror. In theory,
> on system A I shou
I'm confused.. FreeBSD has had full PPPoE support for about 4 years.
there is also PPPoA support..
why do you think there is not?
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> Hello to all,
>
> I'm using FreeBSD for almost 4 years and I will continue with it because
> I can't find better.
Hi guys ...
I thought I'd give you a heads-up that I'm porting libnss-mysql to the NSS
API that FreeBSD 5.1 has adopted in case anyone has input, suggestions,
wants to test, etc..
I'm also curious about including it eventually .. via ports or something
perhaps?
Is anyone else developing NSS modul
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > This is a RFC on a change to sys_errlist for errno = 0.
> >
> > On Linux, if perror() or strerror() is called with errno = 0, the resulting
> > string is "Success".
> > On FreeBSD, the resulting string is "Unknown error: 0".
>
I'm looking at building a fileserver and want to mirror the data
across two systems (if one fails, I can use the other).
Consider system A as the server and system B as the mirror. In theory,
on system A I should be able to:
mount B:/big/data/blob /remote
vnconfig /big/data/block
Hello to all,
I'm using FreeBSD for almost 4 years and I will continue with it because
I can't find better.
I subscribed to a ADSL connection in Portugal that supports only PPPoE
(and not PPPoA).
Almost everyone in Portugal uses only 2 modems (supported by ISPs):
Siemens Santis USB and Alcatel
First off, thank you everyone who has helped me with this.
After the reading that I have been through this is basically what I've come
to:
throughput = window size / RTT
Which means that if I want a 5Mbit/s throughput and my RTT is 220ms then I
want a window size of 137,500 bytes. Is this inaccur
On 10-Jul-2003 Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> JB>On 09-Jul-2003 Harti Brandt wrote:
> JB>>
> JB>> Hi,
> JB>>
> JB>> I just had a crash while typing ^C to a program that has a kevent timer
> JB>> running. The crash was:
> JB>>
> JB>> callout_stop
> JB>> callout_r
I have a lan of maybe 200 nodes where a BSD box is performing as the
core router (with cisco's doing line-connectivity). It is all switched,
with no VLAN in place.
Each machine (in general) has its own subnet. Most are /29's, some are as
large as a /25. Each subnet has a single gateway ip conf
They do on : http://sapdb.2scale.net/moin.cgi/SupportedPlatforms
SAP officially will not support a FreeBSD port, so they wont offer it on
the www.sapdb.org site. They unofficially support the porting process
though.
Cheers
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
After some days offline (thanx to Denic), www.komadev.de is online
again.
1.) In my eyes ( correct me if im wrong), its a native port, using the
linuxthreads lib from freebsd. Its furthermore native, because it does
NOT need linux_base to be installed. (except for building, but thats sth
diff
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Max Clark wrote:
> > We've done this in the past for protocols such as ftp, http and smtp; and
> it works wonders.
>
> The protocol is FTP, what sort of proxy are you talking about here? I would
> like to have...
Commercial/Custom written; mostly based on the apache framewo
> We've done this in the past for protocols such as ftp, http and smtp; and
it works wonders.
The protocol is FTP, what sort of proxy are you talking about here? I would
like to have...
ftp server freebsd proxy <---Network Link---> freebsd proxy
Windows PC
I assumed that my first step in this
I can reasonably protect these machines via a VPN or similar strategy so I
am not to worried about making changes that would open up other
undesirables.
I am trying to devise a chart where if the desired bandwidth is (a) then I
set (x/y/z) variables to (b/c/d). So for instance if I want to run at
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:12:36AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> hi all,
> googling shows this not to be anything new, but ...
> it happend when we enabled tcp/nfs on our NetApp fileservers.
> so the question is:
> 1- is it serious - it doesn't seem so ...
> 2- can it be ignored?
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Okay, let's say how do I force my machine to think it doesn't have any
> > latency and saturate a 6Mbit/s link even though the link has 220ms latency?
>
> See the recent discussion on the FreeBSD-performance mailing list.
Your propblem is similar to
Max Clark wrote:
> :) hehe...
>
> Okay, let's say how do I force my machine to think it doesn't have any
> latency and saturate a 6Mbit/s link even though the link has 220ms latency?
See the recent discussion on the FreeBSD-performance mailing list.
-- Terry
_
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 09), Max Clark said:
> > > 600/8*.220 = 165Kbytes or 1.32Mbit/s
> >
> > I understand the BDP concept and the calculation to then generate the
> > tcp window sizes. What I don't understand is this...
> >
> > How in the world is a windows 2000 box runn
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Eric Jacobs wrote:
EJ>On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
EJ>
EJ>I didn't think of it in my original post, but perhaps we need a
EJ>"thissoftcheck" pointer that works analogously to "nextsoftcheck",
EJ>except that instead of being advanced to the next entry in the queue,
E
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
JB>On 09-Jul-2003 Harti Brandt wrote:
JB>>
JB>> Hi,
JB>>
JB>> I just had a crash while typing ^C to a program that has a kevent timer
JB>> running. The crash was:
JB>>
JB>> callout_stop
JB>> callout_reset
JB>> filt_timerexpire
JB>> softclock
JB>>
JB>> and ca
hi all,
googling shows this not to be anything new, but ...
it happend when we enabled tcp/nfs on our NetApp fileservers.
so the question is:
1- is it serious - it doesn't seem so ...
2- can it be ignored?
the main problem is that to turn it off, i have to reboot some 600
38 matches
Mail list logo
