Normally, quotas work on a per-user, per-filesystem basis - so if a user
has a home directory and other processes _not owned by that user_ are
placing files and using up space into that directory, it will not count
toward the quota (unless they get chowned/chgrpd to that user/group).
Is there any
On 22 Jun, Andrey Alekseyev wrote:
> Don,
>
>> When a file is renamed on the server, its file handle remains valid.
>
> Actually I was wrong in my assumption on how names are purged from the
> namecache. And I didn't mean an operation with a file opened on the client.
> And it actually happens th
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-18 11:01:25 +0100:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:18:52PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > Some of this could be done in the current installer, if there wasn't
> > an effort to make it still fit on a floppy. Mind you, I'd like to see
> > the floppy based install stick aro
Hi there,
I asked the same question to Nick Hibma but he is very busy and can't
help me. If someone know how to convert a linux-src to freebsd to
access my UPS I'd happy to test any piece of (non explosive) code he
sent me...
Also please Cc: me, I'm only on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-23 11:45:37 -0400:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Socketd wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have this configuration and not having the
> > system fail (because of lacking rights or something):
> > /var/mail noexec
>
> nosuid would be fine here also.
# [EMAIL P
becuz you obviously have no idea what this list is about
From: "Edward Tiruvsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Questions
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:18:09 +
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [63.185.112.139]
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 63.185.
is this the right list to send this to?
From: "Edward Tiruvsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 08:57:46 +
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [158.253.192.33]
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.20
Thank you very much for your answers.
see below
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:56:11PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > Can you check if the mail was accepted by the FreeBSD mail server? It
> > looks like GNATS email is rather aggressively filtered against server
> > blacklists; I have to route
Hi,
I am trying to make something useful with libvgl, but I noticed a few
problems:
- I cannot use the SW_VGA_xxx-modes. That means:
/usr/share/examples/libvgl/demo.c does not work, either.
- My system hangs after using any VESA mode prefixed with CG (e.a. 256
palette entries, I think), calli
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:56:11PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> Can you check if the mail was accepted by the FreeBSD mail server? It
> looks like GNATS email is rather aggressively filtered against server
> blacklists; I have to route all my PRs through an SSH tunnel to a different
> syste
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: "Ruslan Ermilov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vahe Khachikyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD Hackers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: Is GNATS broken ??
>On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:18:01AM +0200, Vahe Khachikyan wrote:
>>[
i know this might be a long shot but ive got some questions and i was hoping
someone could help me out or point me in the direction of someone who
can...reply through the digest
first off is it possible or even plausible to use several anonimous
remailers to scramble an identity very well before
Hello.
I want to discuss two things about sysctls.
1. If there is need to use M_WAITOK when allocating memory?
Every SYSCTL_ADD_* macro returns pointer that could be tested if it isn't
NULL (when malloc(9) failed). I'm talking about dynamic sysctls.
2. Secound thing. I'm wondering if there
13 matches
Mail list logo
