Danny Braniss wrote:
> > What a lame program...
> >
> > If this program is indicative of your real-world work-load, you can
> > optimize a lot by getting better programmers.
> >
> > If it is not indicative, then forget about it.
>
> i wish i could :-)
This is a memory overcommit architecture.
If
> What a lame program...
>
> If this program is indicative of your real-world work-load, you can
> optimize a lot by getting better programmers.
>
> If it is not indicative, then forget about it.
i wish i could :-)
danny
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I want as many people as possible to beat up on sysinstall as much as
> they can.
>
> And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away.
>
> Please try to be creative in the choices you make in sysinstall, we
> don't need 20 people all testing ftp-passive, we need
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : a timeout() call will do (at most once per tick). grep for "timeout("
> : in most of device drivers to see how to use it.
>
> Also, A software interrupt would be good too, depending
I built a "make release" overnight and I managed to install from it
by copying the boot.flp image to a ZIP disk, selecting Minimum and
FTP passive.
So far so good.
But we all know that sysintall has a few more bells and whistles than
that, so NOW is the TIME of all good men to come to the aid of
> You never said if you are using TCP wrappers. Can you show us the
> actual output from the machine? What do,
Yes, I guess I am now, but the problem existed before as well. The TCP
wrapper is just whatever is enabled by configuring /etc/hosts.allow.
In the following, 'andrew' is the account that
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:31:48PM +0200, Linus Kendall wrote:
[snip]
>
> That was very thorough, thanks! Now I at least have a notion of what
> is going on. Since this is slightly urgent I guess a hack into the
> libcurl source code to try to remove the sigalarms would do the trick
> (in my case
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:20:52AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
: > A device driver I'm porting from Linux uses tasklets to schedule a
: > recurring
: > event to work around a hardware bug. What would be the e
> From what I have gathered doing web seaches, the cpuid opcode is *not*
> trappable. :(
What's the problem then?
The guest OS should get proper info from the CPUID instruction.
Can you test that? What does CPU info program show about the CPU
in a guest OS?
The problem is in VMWare - it has some w
Hi Guys,
I have been experiencing several kernel panics from differents
situations, since a ls to just boot the kernel.
I configured all the options in rc.conf to save the core dump from
memory to HD and some of the results are
here in the file panics. Above all I search at internet some
what the requirements for the people to do the work?
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:41:58PM -0400, wolf wrote:
>
>>I have search the web trying to find info on vmware3 and FreeBSD as the
>>host os.
>>
>>I noticed a post where someone said they got the modules working, but
>>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:48:34PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:24:08PM +0200, Linus Kendall wrote:
> > m?n 2002-10-21 klockan 14.45 skrev Peter Pentchev:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:35:59PM +0200, Linus Kendall wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to por
Eric Anholt writes:
> On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 08:16, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have two hosts connected to one monitor. My idea is attach the
> > display to the other host by issuing `xset dpms force suspend'.
> > This works on one host with a Matrox Millenium.
> > On the ho
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
> comments?
That code is a REALLY inefficient use of malloc(). You can always
write bizarre code that exaggerates the differences between different
algorithms (e.g. Linux malloc vs FreeBSD malloc).
Kris
msg37495/pgp0.pgp
Desc
Hello hackers...
We got for example a kld module and we have catched some syscall.
Now we want to change effective uid of process, but not curproc.
How to lock this process?
struct proc *proc;
uid_t olduid;
[...]
if ((proc = pfind(123)) == NULL)
ret
Linus Kendall wrote:
> That was very thorough, thanks! Now I at least have a notion of what
> is going on. Since this is slightly urgent I guess a hack into the
> libcurl source code to try to remove the sigalarms would do the trick
> (in my case). In the general case it seems like there's a rather
Diego Wentz Antunes wrote:
> >> I have been experiencing several kernel panics from differents
> >> situations, since a ls to just boot the kernel.
> >> I configured all the options in rc.conf to save the core dump from
> >> memory to HD and some of the results are
> >> here in the file panics
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:19:03AM -0600, Scott Carmichael wrote:
> Netstat reports properly...
>
> I think the issue is that an 'nslookup [ip]' will resolve to a host where
> an 'nslookup [host]' will not resolve to [ip]. Its the way the DNS on the
> other end is set up, but I can't exactly chang
On Oct 21 at 15:10, Andrew Gallatin spoke:
>
> Eric Anholt writes:
> > You need XFree86-Server-4.2.1_4 or later (it's at _5 now).
> >
>
> I'm running 4.2.1_4 and dpms does not work for me.
>
> I just grabbed some diffs from the Xfree86 cvs to bring
> drivers/ati/r128_driver.c up to 1.57.2.
Sorry for that.
Diego Wentz Antunes wrote:
I have been experiencing several kernel panics from differents
situations, since a ls to just boot the kernel.
I configured all the options in rc.conf to save the core dump from
memory to HD and some of the results are
here in the file panics. Ab
mån 2002-10-21 klockan 21.44 skrev Peter Pentchev:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:33:46PM +0200, Linus Kendall wrote:
> > Answer inline below.
> >
> > m?n 2002-10-21 klockan 15.50 skrev Peter Pentchev:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:48:34PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002
Hello,
I have two hosts connected to one monitor. My idea is attach the
display to the other host by issuing `xset dpms force suspend'.
This works on one host with a Matrox Millenium.
On the host with an Ati Rage 128 Pro TF it works with Netbsd, but
it doesn't work with FreeBSD 4.7-Release.
The sc
A device driver I'm porting from Linux uses tasklets to schedule a
recurring
event to work around a hardware bug. What would be the equivalent in
FreeBSD?
David Christensen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Okay, I can see what the problem is; however, I have absolutely no idea
> how it is to be solved :(
>
> The DNS resolution routines of libcurl use alarm() as a timeout
> mechanism for the system DNS resolving functions. To enforce the
> timeout even wh
24 matches
Mail list logo
