If memory serves me right, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > hm, i don't think i made myself clear with the previous para. how
> > about this: is the pmake tutorial mentioned above carved in stone or
> > are updates allowed?
>
> That's a political question, and probably should be asked on curre
Ian,
Ian Cartwright wrote:
>
> As I understand it, so long as the local tunnel endpoint is the external
> interface of the local gateway, the encapsulated traffic should already
> look like it is coming from the external interface and should not be
> NATed (while the traffic inside the tunnel lo
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> yup. or the fact that /usr/share/doc/psd/12.make/paper.ascii.gz
> documents conditionals in the form #keyword instead of .keyword
> (that might work, i haven't tried, but shouldn't the tutorial be
> updated? even if the # forms work th
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Nielsen wrote:
> IPFW's forwarding feature can be used for transparent proxying on another
> machine. To do it on the same machine, you'd probably need to use NAT.
no you can use fwd on thesame machine too.
just fwd to a local address.
>
> Nate
>
> > I haven't actual
Lars,
The 200.200.201.1 is the external IP address of the remote gateway. The
200.200.200.0/16 is the internal (remote) network. In real life the
networks do not overlap (my sample seems to suggest that they do.
Oops...).
As I understand it, so long as the local tunnel endpoint is the external
i
Ian,
this stuff is definitly tricky to get into... :-)
Ian Cartwright wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the document, it was very informative. So what
> you are sayng is that I am running two tunnels in parallel? I had
> suspected this, but since it was the only way I was able to make it work
Lars,
Thank you very much for the document, it was very informative. So what
you are sayng is that I am running two tunnels in parallel? I had
suspected this, but since it was the only way I was able to make it work
and all the examples I could find fro FreeBSD involved a gif tunnel, I
thought th
Hi,
Ian Cartwright wrote:
> I am trying to construct a "B2B" mode VPN tunnel between my house and my
> work using FreeBSD.
...
> Here is my current configuration (IPs changed to protect the guilty):
>
> fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet 100.100.100.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 68.3.250.
Ian Cartwright wrote:
> I am trying to construct a "B2B" mode VPN tunnel between my house and my
> work using FreeBSD. My work uses Checkpoint VPN-1 and I have a FreeBSD
> firewall that is running ipfilter to do firewall/NAT duties. I have so
> far been successful in creating a tunnel between the
Greetings:
I am trying to construct a "B2B" mode VPN tunnel between my house and my
work using FreeBSD. My work uses Checkpoint VPN-1 and I have a FreeBSD
firewall that is running ipfilter to do firewall/NAT duties. I have so
far been successful in creating a tunnel between the FreeBSD box and my
IPFW's forwarding feature can be used for transparent proxying on another
machine. To do it on the same machine, you'd probably need to use NAT.
Nate
> I haven't actually tried this, but shouldn't it be possible
> to use IPFW's forwarding feature for that? For example,
> let sendmail run on por
ATTENTION:
I am Edward Mulete JR. the son of Mr.
STEVE MBEKI MULETE from Zimbabwe. I am sorry this mail
will surprise you, though we do not know, my mother Mrs. Clara
got your contact through the International Chamber of Commerce.
Due to the current war against white farmers in
Zimbabwe an
12 matches
Mail list logo
