Re: Printer (lpt0) Device Busy (Epson Stylus Color 740)

2002-09-17 Thread Evan Dower
I'm sorry. I'm really sorry. The problem with my printer... was that it was out of ink. I'm very sorry. As it turns out, and Epson Stylus Color 740 will continue to print after the ink low LED turns on, but only for a limited time. After a while, it will simply stop accepting jobs, and your com

Re: Printer (lpt0) Device Busy (Epson Stylus Color 740)

2002-09-17 Thread Evan Dower
I'm sorry. I'm really sorry. The problem with my printer... was that it was out of ink. I'm very sorry. As it turns out, and Epson Stylus Color 740 will continue to print after the ink low LED turns on, but only for a limited time. After a while, it will simply stop accepting jobs, and your com

Re: ATA 133 Drives on 4.7-PRERELEASE

2002-09-17 Thread Jim Durham
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 11:46 am, Jim Durham wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm using an AOPEN AK77PRO motherboard with 4.7 PRERELEASE. > > The ATA controller (VIA 8233) is not show on the freebsd.org web > site as a supported chipset. Is this correct? I have reason to > believe not, as a friend with

Uur (voorafgaand aan de Algemene

2002-09-17 Thread De Brabandere Jean-Luc
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_0094_016EB83A.64C83A90"

Re: Changing process informations.

2002-09-17 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:09:32AM +0200, Michał Belczyk wrote: +> root@vanity ~#echo blah > /tmp/file +> root@vanity ~#chmod 604 /tmp/file +> root@vanity ~#ls -l /tmp/file +> -rwr-- 1 root wheel 5 17 Wrz 11:02 /tmp/file +> +> diavul@vanity ~$id +> uid=666(diavul) gid=666(diavul) groups=66

ATA 133 Drives on 4.7-PRERELEASE

2002-09-17 Thread Jim Durham
Hi Folks, I'm using an AOPEN AK77PRO motherboard with 4.7 PRERELEASE. The ATA controller (VIA 8233) is not show on the freebsd.org web site as a supported chipset. Is this correct? I have reason to believe not, as a friend with a local ISP is running several of these motherboards with -STABLE

Solaris x86 partitions

2002-09-17 Thread Dimitar Peikov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Did someone is trying to mount Solaris x86 slice on FreeBSD. - -- Dimitar Peikov Programmer Analyst Globalization Group "We Build e-Business" RILA Solutions 27 Building, Acad.G.Bonchev Str. 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria phone: (+359 2) 9797320 p

How can I access the special disk sector in kernel?

2002-09-17 Thread kai ouyang
Hi,Everybody, I want to read a special sector from my disk in kernel, how can I do? For example: I want to read the 48th sector in ad0. in kernel space, if I use the 'open' , 'lseek' , 'read' and 'close', it is wrong! So I do not know how to do. Thank you! Best Regards Ouyang Kai __

How can I access the special disk sector in kernel?

2002-09-17 Thread kai ouyang
Hi,Everybody, I want to read a special sector from my disk in kernel, how can I do? For example: I want to read the 48th sector in ad0. in kernel space, if I use the 'open' , 'lseek' , 'read' and 'close', it is wrong! So I do not know how to do. Thank you! Best Regards Ouyang Kai __

Re: Kernel panic under heavy disk load - trace enclosed

2002-09-17 Thread Evgueni V. Gavrilov
Greg Lane wrote: > Can anyone tell me if this hardware or a real bug? Is there anything > else I could supply which would help in understanding the problem? take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42277 and http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42235 -- VAMPIRO-RIPN http

$BAmM}K,D+!"Ho32

2002-09-17 Thread jir
$BAmM}K,D+!"Ho32 : > : $B$H$3$m$,!"8x6&;v6H$r$d$C$F$$$?;~Be$b$=$&$O$J$i$J$+$C$?!#(B : > : > : > : > 13$BG/0LA0$^$G$O9bEY@.D9$O$&$^$/$$$C$F$$$^$7$?!#(B : > : > :$B8x6&;v6H$r$d$C$F$$$?;~Be$b$=$&$O$J$i$J$+$C$?$O$=$N$H$-$^$G$OEv$F$O$^$j$^$;$s$h!#(B : > : > $B%G!<%?$r8!F$$77k2L$O8!F$8e$&!A$5$

Re: /dev/null sources

2002-09-17 Thread Mark Murray
> I'd wish to implement something like /dev/null or /dev/zero driver taking > the original source code as a base, but I can't find the sources > themselves, can you help? On STABLE (4.x and below) it is in src/sys/i386/i386/mem.c and it is a bit messy. (Look for "Rathole") On Current (5.0+) it i

Re: Changing process informations.

2002-09-17 Thread Michał Belczyk
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 01:07:35PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> void > +> delgroup(struct proc *p, gid_t gid) > +> { > [...] > +>setsugid(p);/* XXX: Have to be here? */ > +> } > > When I'm removing group should I call setsugid() and set P_SUGID flag? > I think that in delgroup()