Re: I climb the mountain seeking wisdom

2002-09-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 9 September 2002 at 20:14:34 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > >> There will always be situations where the debugger can't catch the > >> problem in time. Then it's up to you to guess and put a breakpoint > >> just before it free

Re: I climb the mountain seeking wisdom

2002-09-09 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Monday, 9 September 2002 at 20:14:34 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> There will always be situations where the debugger can't catch the >> problem in time. Then it's up to you to guess and put a breakpoint >> just before it freezes; this can be an interative proces

Re: I climb the mountain seeking wisdom

2002-09-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > There will always be situations where the debugger can't catch the > problem in time. Then it's up to you to guess and put a breakpoint > just before it freezes; this can be an interative process. The method > requiring the least thought is to single step over functi

Re: I climb the mountain seeking wisdom

2002-09-09 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Monday, 9 September 2002 at 16:31:10 -0600, Stacy Millions wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Friday, 6 September 2002 at 12:23:13 -0600, Stacy Millions wrote: > >>> Page fault while in kernel mode unfortunately, ddb hangs so I don't >>> get a core file. >> >> >> That's obviously t

Re: what does this mean?

2002-09-09 Thread Kip Macy
> > ANother case of the "obscure beyond belief" > message: > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 I would assume it means that 0x is the bitmap of probed irqs and that irq3 0x10 configured for sio1 is not in that bitmap. isa/sio.c: /* * Turn off

what does this mean?

2002-09-09 Thread Julian Elischer
ANother case of the "obscure beyond belief" message: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 what on earth is this trying to tell me? WHAT bitmap? julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: I climb the mountain seeking wisdom

2002-09-09 Thread Stacy Millions
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 6 September 2002 at 12:23:13 -0600, Stacy Millions wrote: >>Page fault while in kernel mode unfortunately, ddb hangs so I don't >>get a core file. > > > That's obviously the first thing you should address. I'm open to suggestions. How can I force a

Re: DVD-RAM: multi-session writing

2002-09-09 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 13:34:28 -0400, Charles Peterman wrote: > > FreeBSD 4.5. > Hitachi DVD-RAM drive > > I have to support writing files to a DVD-RAM in a Windows compatible mode. > Normally I would treat the thing as a slow HD and read and write at my > leisure, but Windows does not play n

DVD-RAM: multi-session writing

2002-09-09 Thread Charles Peterman
FreeBSD 4.5. Hitachi DVD-RAM drive I have to support writing files to a DVD-RAM in a Windows compatible mode. Normally I would treat the thing as a slow HD and read and write at my leisure, but Windows does not play nicely with UFS. So I came upon the solution of writing an ISO image out to t

Re: interrupting target kernel using single sio

2002-09-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Sep 09 at 04:52, Julian Elischer spoke: > > it isdangerous because rebooting the local machine can en up sending a break > > to the remote machine. > > Is that to say rebooting the machine where I want to run gdb? > I've rebooted this machine and nothing happened. > I

Re: interrupting target kernel using single sio

2002-09-09 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > using a single serial cable I can pass control to the remote kgdb > pressing ctl-alt-del at the target host. > I'm looking for a means to interrupt the target kernel from the > remote host. > I got suggestions using a

Re: interrupting target kernel using single sio

2002-09-09 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Sep 09 at 04:52, Julian Elischer spoke: > there is the following option: > # Options for serial drivers that support consoles (only for sio now): > options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER #a BREAK on a comconsole goes to > #DDB, if available. > it isda

Problems with PC Card card in -current!

2002-09-09 Thread Gheorghe Ardelean
Hi, I am having problems getting Avaya Wireless Wi/Fi ETS Card 11 Mb/s GOLD working under FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-20020818-JPSNAP on a IBM Thinkpad Laptop. Do I miss some special settings? When I am inserting the card in the slot I get the following message: pccard1: Card has no functions! cbb1:

Re: interrupting target kernel using single sio

2002-09-09 Thread Julian Elischer
there is the following option: # Options for serial drivers that support consoles (only for sio now): options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER #a BREAK on a comconsole goes to #DDB, if available. it isdangerous because rebooting the local machine can en up se

Re: Remote kernel debugging over Ethernet (was: interrupting the remote kernel)

2002-09-09 Thread Christian Zander
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 09:54:47PM -0700, Tim Gilman wrote: > > Sorry about this, Christian; your patches are buried in my > bottomless inbox. It appears real-life has swept me off my > feet. I fully don't expect to come down for a month or so > (getting married in 2 weeks, honeymoon, etc), so pl

Re: interrupting target kernel using single sio

2002-09-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Hanspeter Roth wrote: > using a single serial cable I can pass control to the remote kgdb > pressing ctl-alt-del at the target host. > I'm looking for a means to interrupt the target kernel from the > remote host. > I got suggestions using a second serial cable or using ipgdb > instead. > Setting

interrupting target kernel using single sio

2002-09-09 Thread Hanspeter Roth
Hello, using a single serial cable I can pass control to the remote kgdb pressing ctl-alt-del at the target host. I'm looking for a means to interrupt the target kernel from the remote host. I got suggestions using a second serial cable or using ipgdb instead. Setting remotechat didn't help me.