> > In some sense this sounds like an interrupt issue. The timeout is 30
> > seconds, and it looks like we give up on the command but it's done
> > instantaneously afterwards.
>
> Hm. I don't know much about the PCI code, so maybe what follows won't
> make any sense and may not be related: The
Matthew Jacob wrote:
> In some sense this sounds like an interrupt issue. The timeout is 30
> seconds, and it looks like we give up on the command but it's done
> instantaneously afterwards.
Hm. I don't know much about the PCI code, so maybe what follows won't
make any sense and may not be relat
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > This isn't good. Part of it just the chip later presenting the
> > completion for a command that I had already timed out. But basically,
> > we never got a response to a command, so we timed it out. Later, the
> > ch
mark tinguely wrote:
>
> Another interesting processor family is the AMD x86-64 ClawHammer.
> I do not know the progress the FreeBSD/x86-64 project. I would imagine
> the major difficulty will be getting a running compiler.
Nope, the compiler is already pretty robust.
> I just wish AMD added an
Hello hackers...
Syscall number (when catching syscall) in -STABLE in placed in:
p->p_md.md_regs->tf_eax (for i386)
p->p_md.md_tf[FRAME_V0] (for alpha)
But as I see, in -CURRENT even p_md has diffrent type.
Could someone can give me equivalent place (where syscall number is stor
Matthew,
Matthew Jacob wrote:
> This isn't good. Part of it just the chip later presenting the
> completion for a command that I had already timed out. But basically,
> we never got a response to a command, so we timed it out. Later, the
> chip presented us with the comamnd as being done- and bei
Oh, yes- let me know if you've upgraded to the latest LSI 53c1030 f/w
(that'd 1.0.12).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[ cc list trimmed ]
[ I guess I got unsubscribed from hackers, so I missed the front end of
this. Every time I try and sort out majordomo at FreeBSD, it fails for
me (like trying ask "what am I subscribed to") and all requests to
postmaster seem to bitbucket. Oh well. ]
This isn't good. Part of
While we're on the topic of vmapbuf:
I have a kernel module that maps two 64k chunks of user memory into the kernel
using the same set of steps that cam_periph_mapmem uses. However, I inevitably
get the following panic after running the code for a bit:
Aug 30 14:55:26 testhost /kernel: panic: wor
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
>
> Thanx. It's nearly done. I just need to know two more small things.
>
> physio() requires a dev_t as a parameter. What do I give in over here? I
> can't give NULL, cause it does use it for some stuff in the function
> definition.
I wasn't suggest
Thanx. It's nearly done. I just need to know two more small things.
physio() requires a dev_t as a parameter. What do I give in over here? I
can't give NULL, cause it does use it for some stuff in the function
definition.
Also, the only other parameters to physio() are the uio and the ioflag
(w
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
>
> I'm a little bit confused about this vmapbuf() thing. This is what I think,
> correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> I have this User Virtual address, userbuf --> associated to physadd
>
> Now, I do vmapbuf(physadd), and I get a Kernel Virtual Address asso
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
>
> I'm a little bit confused about this vmapbuf() thing. This is what I think,
> correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> I have this User Virtual address, userbuf --> associated to physadd
>
> Now, I do vmapbuf(physadd), and I get a Kernel Virtual Address asso
I'm a little bit confused about this vmapbuf() thing. This is what I think,
correct me if I'm wrong.
I have this User Virtual address, userbuf --> associated to physadd
Now, I do vmapbuf(physadd), and I get a Kernel Virtual Address associated to
this "physadd". Now, I write to this Kernel Virtu
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Physio() does this.. first it finds the physical addresses of the user
> pages targetted, then it maps those pages into kernel space, and then it
> initiates IO to them. (this actually needs to change but for now it's
> true.
to correct myself..
p
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:50:14 -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> >
> > Did you also backport rev 1.35 and 1.36 of scsi_all.c?
> > You may need that as well.
>
> Good catch, I missed that file. After applying that patch, they now seem
> to be detected correctly:
>
> da0 at
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there some function using which I can copy data from the Kernel Virtual
> Space to a pinned Physical Address Page.
Not as such, though there are plenty of places that do such a thing. The
answer is always to map the physical page somewher
Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> Did you also backport rev 1.35 and 1.36 of scsi_all.c?
> You may need that as well.
Good catch, I missed that file. After applying that patch, they now seem
to be detected correctly:
da0 at mpt1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da0: 320.0
Hi,
Is there some function using which I can copy data from the Kernel Virtual
Space to a pinned Physical Address Page.
Thanx,
Pavan Balaji,
Intel Corporation
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Only the Paranoid Survive" -- Andy Grove
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:11:12 -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Lars Eggert wrote:
> >>
> >>We just got a bunch of Dell machines that have this controller as well.
> >>Any news about support in sym?
> >
> > No, you want the 'mpt' driver that Matt Jacob recently committed. The
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>>
>>We just got a bunch of Dell machines that have this controller as well.
>>Any news about support in sym?
>
> No, you want the 'mpt' driver that Matt Jacob recently committed. The 1030
> has nothing in common with sym.
I backported the mpt driver from
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:41:54AM -0700, Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> I wonder, is it possible for the root user of a jail to set quotas
> _inside_ her jail for users _inside_ her jail ? Can anyone simply confirm
> or deny that this is possible ?
Yes, it is possible. The following procedure (ass
Has anyone got this to work yet? Is it something that will get fixed with
fbsd, or will it tack a bios upgrade from intel?
I was wondering if there is a way to just hardcode this value for the time
being, I know that my box has two Intel SE7500CW2 CPUs in it. Could this
whole problem be rep
Has anyone got this to work yet? Is it something that will get fixed with
fbsd, or will it tack a bios upgrade from intel?
I was wondering if there is a way to just hardcode this value for the time
being, I know that my box has two Intel SE7500CW2 CPUs in it. Could this
whole problem be rep
Ut-oh. Time for a rant...
mark tinguely wrote:
> Another interesting processor family is the AMD x86-64 ClawHammer.
> I do not know the progress the FreeBSD/x86-64 project. I would imagine
> the major difficulty will be getting a running compiler.
Actually, the major difficulty is getting a box
Another interesting processor family is the AMD x86-64 ClawHammer.
I do not know the progress the FreeBSD/x86-64 project. I would imagine
the major difficulty will be getting a running compiler.
I just wish AMD added an 8K page size so the Page Table Maps did not
eat so much memory.
--mark ting
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Patrick
Thomas writes:
>
> And more important;y, does anyone know _why_ it is happening and what it
> means for a system affected ?
I had this occur once. As it turned out, one of the clocks in the clock
chip was hooped. Replacing the motherboard fixed the probl
Terry Lambert writes:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > I knew not to recommend the Alpha because it is limited to 2G
> > > of physical memory.
> >
> > ?
> >
> > FreeBSD is limited to using 2G of whatever you have in the Alpha.
> > Which is a deficiency that has been debated a number of times,
Of course we run Vmware 2 under emulation. So vmware 3 MUST be run under
emulation.
As has been said before, it probably runs but the setup
program looks for too many linux specifics and doesn't generate a good
config file.
It just takes someone to figure out what it needs.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:09:57AM -0400, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> The VMWare documentation for even version 3.1 indicates FreeBSD support
> as a client OS only.
If you check the small print, that's what it says.
Having said that though, I have had 3.0 running as well as 2.0, under
-STABLE, us
You might get it to run under Linux emulation... I've never tried it
though.
The VMWare documentation for even version 3.1 indicates FreeBSD support
as a client OS only.
I assume you knew that, but I wanted to save you the trouble of a
possible "wild-goose-chase" id you didn't.
Good luck!
-Ric
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Patrick Thomas wrote:
> I wonder, is it possible for the root user of a jail to set quotas
> _inside_ her jail for users _inside_ her jail ? Can anyone simply confirm
> or deny that this is possible ?
You can't. You have to set quota from the host machine over something lik
Hello,
I realize the difficulties in trying to use quotas on the _host_ system to
limit the size of jails on the host system - userid mapping, etc. This is
not what I am asking.
I wonder, is it possible for the root user of a jail to set quotas
_inside_ her jail for users _inside_ her jail ?
33 matches
Mail list logo
