Ok, this seems to have died down a bit, and my own urgency has passed
since it is no longer manifesting itself on my test machinehowever,
two things come to mind:
1. is it possible that arbitrary top output is now suspect on machines
that have manifested this behavior ? I am not showing all
Julien Benoist wrote:
> This is a patch allowing to control kernel logging of promiscuous mode changes
> on network interfaces through sysctl (enabled by default) :
> kern.log_promisc=1
>
> I dont know if this mib should be placed somewhere else, nor if the feature
> itself could interest
This is a patch allowing to control kernel logging of promiscuous mode changes
on network interfaces through sysctl (enabled by default) :
kern.log_promisc=1
I dont know if this mib should be placed somewhere else, nor if the feature
itself could interest anyone... Patch attached anyway
Dear Sir,
our company is specialized in Import and Export used Formwor Worldwide. We
are searching for partners for develloping
our activity.
Please contact us if you are interested in such an activity.
Best Regards.
S.BUTAUX.
Tel: + 49 177 57 57 329
Fax: + 49 25 61 95 950 4001
www.formwork.
Dan Langille wrote:
> I've tested this from several boxes behind my firewall each time
> emailing to a box outside the firewall. The test was:
>
>echo 'hi there' | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
echo 'hi there' | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:30:18PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:03:23AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
+> +> -- Terry
+>
+> Thanks to Your help I've found maybe better way to do this.
[...]
+> But this should works, I'm testing it at the moment.
Yes, working fine,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:01:15AM +0200, Dan Larsson wrote:
> > While trying to get hardware monitoring to work on my computer I
> > found the below procedure to enable the smbus device.
> > It didn't get me any closer to actually monitoring the hardw
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:03:23AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
+> -- Terry
Thanks to Your help I've found maybe better way to do this.
I could catch open(), and:
int myopen(struct proc *p, struct open_args *uap)
{
int ret;
if ((ret = open(p, uap)) != 0)
retu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lerrence Tambert w
rites:
>And don't assume I've never written good software just
>because I decided to troll a bit. I've probably written more lines
>of quality C and assembler now than most of you will in your entire
>life.
Hahahahaha! You want us to belive th
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 13:01]:
> On 22 Aug 2002 at 18:28, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: ""Dan Langille"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Newsgroups: local.freebsd.hackers
> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 1:41 PM
> > Subject: why does this
> ** Original Subject: RE: Amazing!
> ** Original Sender: Lerrence Tambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ** Original Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:00:15 -0400 (EDT)
> ** Original Message follows...
>
> I can't believe the amount of BS that I'm seeing posted here. Terry, stop posting
>SHIT,
please, nob
On 22 Aug 2002 at 18:28, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: ""Dan Langille"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: local.freebsd.hackers
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 1:41 PM
> Subject: why does this sendmail connection take so long?
>
>
> > I'd normally attribute t
I can't believe the amount of BS that I'm seeing posted here. Terry, stop posting
SHIT, please, nobody gives a flying fuck about Zen, or Aristotle, ok?
Then we have all the other people who replied to those trolls, sometimes with
insulting comments, without realizing they just showed what a bun
Hello,
I tried the changes outlined on the list, but SMP still fails at the same
point. Any further suggestions? There's quite a few users with this issue.
A friend of mine went through the lists and counted 18 the other day.
Thanks,
Craig
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:10:14PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> +> The easiest way to do this is to take nullfs and modify it so
> +> that it caches the name of the file for the vnode that is
> +> returned as a value pointed to by the per layer vnode data
> +> area, e
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Engr. Lanre Christian Dickson, Chairman of the Contract Award and Verification
Panel set up by the Federal Ministry of Aviation (FMA) for reconciliation of contract
claims, recomemdation and subsequent approvals. I got yo
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:10:14PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
+> The easiest way to do this is to take nullfs and modify it so
+> that it caches the name of the file for the vnode that is
+> returned as a value pointed to by the per layer vnode data
+> area, e.g. modify struct null_node to add a
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:01:15AM +0200, Dan Larsson wrote:
> While trying to get hardware monitoring to work on my computer I
> found the below procedure to enable the smbus device.
> It didn't get me any closer to actually monitoring the hardware with
> xbmon, lmmon or healthd. But the device i
18 matches
Mail list logo
