I was wondering what the amount of effort involved would be to add
support for dumping on a remote machine via tftp, for example. This
would be extremely handy for devices with little or no hard disk space.
Does anyone know of anything with this functionality?
regards,
jacques
To Unsubscr
Thus spake Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In my case, I don't actually "know" nroff. I just look at
> other man pages and copy what they seem to be doing...
>
> On the other hand, I know even less about sgml.
Likewise, but I find SGML easier to pick up. Granted, I (sadly)
learned HTM
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Mark W. Krentel wrote:
> > Dump on a live FS is always risky. FreeBSD in 4.x and earlier will have
> > up to about a 30 second delay before a write() makes it to physical disk.
Is this regardless of the sync(8) command used ? And if so - what does
sync(8) actually sync - a
[Cc: list massively trimmed.]
On Monday, July 22, 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> IMO the tags aren't the problem with DocBook. It's just *really*
> difficult to get good-looking results with. I've actually converted
> the FreeBSD book into DocBook (anybody want a perl script?), but jade
> c
On Sunday, 21 July 2002 at 17:42:17 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Willcox writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:32:13AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder how true that is these days. The last time I used nroff was for my
>>> masters thesis which w
Hello Friend: Need Small Quantities at Low Prices? Call Us
tollfree at 1-866-266-5173. Great Deals for Ebay, Flea Markets,
Discount Stores, etc. We DROP SHIP
We have about 250 FREE Drop Shipper Club Memberships still
availableover 750 Free Memberships were taken and after the
first 1000 a
> Wow. I'm flattered. Everyone so far thinks 200ms will be ok!
I'd still prefer the default left at 1 sec until there is
enough real testing so that people not taking part in the
test don't get surprised. That is, "dampen" any potential
future oscillations in this value.
To Unsubscribe: s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon w
rites:
>Wow. I'm flattered. Everyone so far thinks 200ms will be ok!
>
>Its up to Jonathan Lemon now. Jonathan, if you sign off on 200ms
>for the MFC I'll go with it.
Even if everybody agrees to 200msec I think it is far too early
f
Wow. I'm flattered. Everyone so far thinks 200ms will be ok!
Its up to Jonathan Lemon now. Jonathan, if you sign off on 200ms
for the MFC I'll go with it.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I believe the basic concept and code is reasonable and the only real
> issue is whether to make the default slop 1000ms or 200ms. I would very
> much like to change the default to 200ms in -stable but I will be happy
> to MFC the code
From: "Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:06:24 +0400
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 02:09:52AM -0400, Brad Laue wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to make FreeBSD boot from extended
>> partitions (of course, with help of boot mgr - in my case that's Wi
200ms is fine with me.
cheers
luigi
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:45:00PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I am going to be MFCing the transmit timer min/slop stuff soon (because
> the vast majority of complaints by users related to this issue is
> on -stable).
>
> I
I am going to be MFCing the transmit timer min/slop stuff soon (because
the vast majority of complaints by users related to this issue is
on -stable).
I believe the basic concept and code is reasonable and the only real
issue is whether to make the default slop 1000ms or 200ms
!
Part-Time Job!! ÊÓËÃѺ¹Ñ¡àÃÕ¹ ¹Ñ¡ÈÖ¡ÉÒ áÅмÙé·Ó§Ò¹»ÃШÓ
¤Ø³µéͧ¡ÒçҹẺ¹ÕéºéÒ§äËÁ
??
-§Ò¹ parttime ·Ó§Ò¹·ÕèºéÒ¹ä´é ¶éҤسãªé Internet à»ç¹
-·Ó§Ò¹à¾Õ§ÇѹÅÐ 2-3 ªÁ.
-ÃÒÂä´é 5,000 15,000 ºÒ·
¶éҤسà»ç¹¤¹Ë¹Ö觷Õè·Ó§Ò¹»ÃШÓËÃ×ÍÂѧäÁèÁÕ§Ò¹·Ó ¹Ñ¡ÈÖ¡ÉÒ·Õè¡ÓÅѧÈÖ¡ÉÒÍÂÙè ¼ÙéÇèÒ§§Ò¹
ËÃ×ͼÙé·Õè
14 matches
Mail list logo
