Re: Kernel hacking questions

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:36:47AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > 2. How do I trace back funcname+offset to a particular line of C code ? > >I tried objdump -d and gcc -S, but it's not easy to read. I thought > >there was a way to get gcc to interleave the C code and the generated > >a

#1 DIET PILL! LOSE 10-15 LBS PER WEEK+"BONUS" 6983

Hey there, If you're like me, you've tried EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose a pound either.  It seemed like the harder I tried, the bigger I got, until I heard about a product called Extreme Power

Re: kernel booting diff between boot2 and loader

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:26:28AM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > I wonder what is different in booting the kernel from loader(8) and from > boot2. > > In vmware2 I am not able to boot the kernel from boot2, it hangs after > loading the kernelfile. Using loader it goes fine. > I tried current,sta

porting from linux

Hi, I'm trying to track down a problem in the netsaint-plugins plugin "check_snmp". It partially works, but if check_snmp is given more than one OID, it bombs out with a failure in "strscat". Apparently "strscat" comes from "utils.c" which is linked with "check_snmp.c". The error generally loo

Re: LINT CPU features table

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Lucky Green wrote: > [This inquiry found no takers on -questions, so I am trying it on > -hackers] > > I found the list of CPU options in LINT to be not very accessible. What > would be considerably more useful, perhaps in addition to the > information in LINT, would be a tab

linker bug?

In order to measure call overhead on an Athlon XP system I compiled and ran the following program and saw some curious results! $ cat foo.c #include void func() { } void(*funp)() = 0; int main(int argc, char **argv) { int i, j; if (argv[1][0] !=

** Approved. **

Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00E5_84A70E3A.C4515B83"

Re: PR kern/36329

> $ uname -a > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-20010911-JPSNAP > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-20010911-JPSNAP #0: > Tue Sep 11 06:48:53 GMT 2001 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 Sorry, i see the date above :) > Is anyone fixxxing it, cause i can't d

Re: Is there any co-operation between KSE and similar effort in NetBSD?

Maxim Sobolev wrote: > I wonder if there is any co-operation between our KSE and similar > effort in NetBSD (see > http://web.mit.edu/nathanw/www/usenix/freenix-sa/freenix-sa.html). To > me it sounds logical to unite efforts if not for the kernel code, but > at least for the kernel interfaces and