Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Writing portable makefiles is already enough of a pain in the ass.
No. It's not. I've written Makefile's that predate the
consolidation during and after The UNIX Wars; they run fine,
unmodified, on 140 different vendor versions of UNIX.
You are smearing the necessary
Jos Backus wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:07:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > --lyndon (who doesn't understand why this is an issue, after having
> > just converted a *whole* lot of source to work with
> > POSIX make. Standards? Who gives a f*** (I guess ...))
>
> I
Sergey Babkin wrote:
> I would really like all the existing make branches (BSD, GNU, SVR4)
> converge to a single syntax. Otherwise it's too much pain, and the
> only workaround is either to use only the classic V7 make features
> or write makefiles for gmake since it's readily available on all
>
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:28:49PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > "Jos" == Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jos> My proposal for adding $^ as an alias for $> does not add any
> Jos> incompatibilities, neither with POSIX nor with any existing BSD
> Jos> make.
>
> Yes
> "Jos" == Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jos> My proposal for adding $^ as an alias for $> does not add any
Jos> incompatibilities, neither with POSIX nor with any existing BSD
Jos> make.
Yes, and no. Adding new features doesn't break existing code, but it
encourages new
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:39:02PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > "Jos" == Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Writing portable makefiles is already enough of a pain in the
> >> ass.
> Jos> Writing Makefiles is a pain, period.
>
> Writing makefiles is easy. Writing
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sorry for X off topic...
> >
> > Is anybody here got that combination running?
> > Thanks in advance for any possible help,
>
> If the 'nv' driver won't deal with it you're out of luck until NVIDIA do
> "Jos" == Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Writing portable makefiles is already enough of a pain in the
>> ass.
Jos> Writing Makefiles is a pain, period.
Writing makefiles is easy. Writing *portable* makefiles is a pain.
There *is* a difference.
--lyndon
To Unsubscri
±¶¹BµØ·H¦Û°â~~¾G¤p©j:0955946855
¥É¦¨µó*¸¹*¼Ó(¬D°ª4¦Ì2)
ªñ©¾§µ±¶¹B«á¤s¸O¯¸,Åvª¬¬ù20©W, ¥þ·s¸ËæC,
¨â©Ð¨âÆU¤@½Ã,¥tªþ¨®¦ì¤@Ó. Õz§K.
·NªÌ½Ð¬¢:
¾G¤p©j:0955946855 OR
®}¥ý¥Í:0922671795
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:33:08PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> We are POSIX compliant right now (I think -- I haven't done a strict
> comparison between (our) BSD make and POSIX). BSD does have things that
> aren't in POSIX, as does GNUmake. Removing the historical BSD syntax
> would just bre
> "Jos" == Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jos> I just checked the Open Group make definition and I can't find
Jos> either $^ or $>. So if we want to be truly standards-compliant
Jos> perhaps we should remove support for $> :-)
We are POSIX compliant right now (I think --
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:07:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> --lyndon (who doesn't understand why this is an issue, after having
> just converted a *whole* lot of source to work with
> POSIX make. Standards? Who gives a f*** (I guess ...))
I just checked the Open Group ma
> "Sergey" == Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sergey> I would really like all the existing make branches (BSD,
Sergey> GNU, SVR4) converge to a single syntax. Otherwise it's too
Sergey> much pain, and the only workaround is either to use only the
Sergey> classic V7 m
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Jos Backus wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:38:17AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > The biggest problem with GNU make that I've seen is re-expansion
> > > of variable variables.
> > >
> > > The suggested fix doesn't address that, so it won't fix the most
> > > comm
Szanowni Państwo,
Chciałbym Państwu zaproponować usługę tłumaczenia z zakresu języka niemieckiego
i angielskiego. Tłumaczenie we wszystkich możliwych konfiguracjach (pol-ang,
ang-niem itd.)
Posiadam kilkunastoletnie doświadczenie w tłumaczeniu różnorodnych tekstów ze
szczególnym uwzględnieniem
:
:Hi Matt and everyone,
:
:I remember that Matt had mentioned adding diffs of the commits to the
:commit-mail, which would make it possible to quickly view what changed
:without leaving the MUA and manually searching for the proper CVS
:diff/rdiff incantation to view the diff.
:
:The idea was re
ÃØ«~¤§¤@¡C
©Ê·P¨ß¤k¦¬D³rªA¹¢$680
!!!±¡½ì¥Î«~¦v°t&§Ö°e
¥´¯}ºô¸ôÁʪ«¶Ç²Î!!¥i¥ý¹w¬ù¬Ý³f¡A¤ñ¸û¦nÃa¦A¶R¡C
¤j¥x¥_®ç¶é°ò¶©·s¦Ë¥H¥_¡A1-2¤p®É¦¨¤H¥Î«~°e³f¨ì©²
¨ä¥L¦a°Ï¤µ¤éqÁÊ©ú¤é¦¬³f¡A¥Ñ¦v°t¤½¥q³f¨ì¥I´Ú¡C
©Ò¦³
On Fri, 31 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry for X off topic...
>
> Is anybody here got that combination running?
>
> I've seen that Linux world did that with Nvidia's help.
> How to port their solution into freebsd 4.5 box?
>
> Thanks in advance for any possible help,
If the 'nv' driver
18 matches
Mail list logo
