On Thu, 30 May 2002, Bjoern Fischer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OpenBSD has a new interesting feature: systrace. It is a system call
> policy generator for "sandboxing" untrusted or semi-trusted binaries.
>
> The whole idea looks interesting. The implementation details look
> relatively simple (read: no
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bjoern Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hello,
:
: OpenBSD has a new interesting feature: systrace. It is a system call
: policy generator for "sandboxing" untrusted or semi-trusted binaries.
:
: The whole idea looks interesting. The implementatio
Posted to -hackers in the hope that this can be tweaked in 4.6 RELEASE.
4.5-RELEASE-p4
% man jail
D=/here/is/the/jail
cd /usr/src
make world DESTDIR=$D
^
|
shouldn't that really be
make installworld DESTDIR=$D
|
Hello,
OpenBSD has a new interesting feature: systrace. It is a system call
policy generator for "sandboxing" untrusted or semi-trusted binaries.
The whole idea looks interesting. The implementation details look
relatively simple (read: not too complicated). Anyone interested in
having a closer
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Gary Stanley wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We have a webserver setup with 1 Intel Pro/1000 Gigabit Ethernet card. The
> old server was using around 95mbit/s of traffic or so (sustained rate). We
> decided to replace that card/machine with something that could handle the
> high network lo
In the last episode (May 29), Gary Stanley said:
> We have a webserver setup with 1 Intel Pro/1000 Gigabit Ethernet
> card. The old server was using around 95mbit/s of traffic or so
> (sustained rate). We decided to replace that card/machine with
> something that could handle the high network load
Hi.
We have a webserver setup with 1 Intel Pro/1000 Gigabit Ethernet card. The
old server was using around 95mbit/s of traffic or so (sustained rate). We
decided to replace that card/machine with something that could handle the
high network load. The question would be, What's a good size for
Interest Rates Have Dropped - SAVE Now
Now is the time to refinance your home or get a second mortgage to
consolidate all of your high interest credit card debt.
Get all the Smart Cash you'll need!
Cash out your equity while rates are low! (UP TO 125%)
All USA Homeowners Easily Qualify!
Damag
It seems Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Richard Nyberg wrote:
> > Hi there.
> > I seem to have some problems with my cd read program.
> >
> > I've attached a small prototype program that for some reason hangs
> > in atprq, even though I use a timeout of 5 seconds. The program reads
> > a cd in
It seems Richard Nyberg wrote:
> Hi there.
> I seem to have some problems with my cd read program.
>
> I've attached a small prototype program that for some reason hangs
> in atprq, even though I use a timeout of 5 seconds. The program reads
> a cd in raw format using the MMC READ_CD command. It
Hi there.
I seem to have some problems with my cd read program.
I've attached a small prototype program that for some reason hangs
in atprq, even though I use a timeout of 5 seconds. The program reads
a cd in raw format using the MMC READ_CD command. It works fine :)
except that it never manages
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:15:10PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason you can't use vinum(4)?
>
>Yes, sir, there is one, like I said before, I want to play with
>raidframe. Being a geek yourself you should understand that :-)
I un
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:03:02AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> I doubt that goes to ports ever.
> Make Problem Report.
ports/38674
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:15:10PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
Hi,
> Is there a reason you can't use vinum(4)?
Yes, sir, there is one, like I said before, I want to play with
raidframe. Being a geek yourself you should understand that :-)
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>The latest raidframe patch seems to be a bit date now, I'd like to know
>if any of you has worked on getting it cleanly applying to a recent
>4.5-STABLE (4.6-RC indeed) system of even 5.0-CURRENT tree. I'd like to
>play with it and would like to know if
Hi hackers,
The latest raidframe patch seems to be a bit date now, I'd like to know
if any of you has worked on getting it cleanly applying to a recent
4.5-STABLE (4.6-RC indeed) system of even 5.0-CURRENT tree. I'd like to
play with it and would like to know if someone has taken care of it
befor
Hello,
Does this ring any bells with anyone? This issue still exists with
FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE (4.6-PRERELEASE) and can be triggered on SMP
machines e.g. by having several process attempting to
create/rename/remove the same directory entry.
Cheers,
--
Jacques A. Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020529 00:42] wrote:
> > Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always
> > > defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen
> > > is for assembler files where old style C is n
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020529 00:42] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always
> > defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen
> > is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid
> > conflicts.
>
>
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always
> defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen
> is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid
> conflicts.
Umm, do we need it there in asm headers? We do not use the traditio
20 matches
Mail list logo
