In my 4.6-RC system, I do not have problems with RIPv2
and OSPFv2 packets. I tried zebra routing daemon just now and
RIP multicast packets with 224.0.0.9 have proper source address
of the interface originating them and OSPFv2 HELLO multicast
packets with dst 224.0.0.5 have proper src address of t
* Rob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020522 20:30]:
> I was just wondering why the src address is set to the host group in
> outgoing multicast packets on RELENG_4? As far as I can tell, rfc1054
> says that the src address should be set to that of the host, not the
> host group (6.2). The behavior exists
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> [I don't have the RT extensions enabled because there was a past thread
> about them being susceptable to priority inversion deadlocks - is this
> still true].
You are succeptible to such deadlocks no matter what.
Priority inversion deadlock only occur in the "spin" case
an
On May 23, echo dev wrote:
> is there anyone that might know why the fflush did not work I fugre
> this works besuse it shoves an empty vale into the buffer thus casuseing
> it to be empty.
>From the C-FAQ - http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
12.26: How can I flush pending input
I know this is not about freebsd but i have noticed you guys are quit good
at C and i am a new learner of the language. I am codeing a number guessing
game all you do is pick a number between 1 and 136.. Now the problem is when
the player answers it correctly it ouputs would you like to play ag
I believe that the new eventhandler.h is depending on newer compiler
tools. This makes it somewhat difficult to bootstrap. Can you make it so it
*doesn't* require gcc3 installed?
cam/cam_xpt.c
In file included from ../../../sys/conf.h:48,
from ../../../cam/cam_xpt.c:38:
../../.
> I've bumped into a similar problem when running StarOffice on a system
> without _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING. It seems that StarOffice likes
> calling sched_yield() and doesn't take ENOSYS as a hint. My syslog
> entries showed repeat counts in the high 5-figure region.
All such messages shoul
- Forwarded message from "Herman, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Herman, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3rd party drivers
Date: Thu, 23
[The reference is ancient but I think it's still relevant.]
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 07:15:28PM -0800, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>silby 2002/02/18 19:15:28 PST
>
> Modified files:
>sys/kern kern_fork.c
> Log:
> A few misc forkbomb defenses:
...
> - Remove the printing of "p
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> 4.6-RC (which I am assuming is "release candidate") still doesn't
> walk the entire PCI bus and find all devices for a Dell Poweredge 4600.
>
> Below, interested parties will be able to peruse the `boot -v' results,
> followed by `scanpci -v1'.
>
On 2002.05.23 11:18:03 +, Fred Souza wrote:
> Since I saw once something similar happening, I think it's good to
> mention that these lines exist in my /etc/make.conf:
>
> CFLAGS= -O2
> COPTFLAGS+= -O2
> CPUTYPE=k6-2
I think you might get these kinds of problems with -O2.
Try com
Hi everyone,
I'm experiencing something weird with my 4.6-RC box (compile of May 18).
What happens is that for some hosts it just won't calculate the
checksum properly, and thus my box is unable to start TCP connections
to those hosts. Here's a piece of the output of tcpdump:
19:16:55
§Ò¹ Part Time ãªéà·¤â¹âÅÂշӧҹ᷹¤Ø³ äÁè¡ÃзºµèͪÕÇÔµ»ÃШÓÇѹ¢Í§¤Ø³
äÁèÇèҤس¨Ðà»ç¹ã¤Ã ¤Ø³µéͧ¡ÒçҹÍÂèÒ§¹ÕéËÃ×Íà»ÅèÒ ??
- âÍ¡ÒÊ·Õè¨Ðà»ç¹à¨éҢͧ¡Ô¨¡ÒÃẺ§èÒ æ
- ÁÕ¸ØáԨ¢Í§µ¹àͧº¹ Internet ( E-Commerce )
- à»Ô´´Óà¹Ô¹§Ò¹µÅÍ´ 24 ªÑèÇâÁ§µèÍÇѹ 7ÇѹµèÍÊÑ»´ÒËì
365Çѹã¹Ë¹Ö觻ÕäÁèÁÕÇѹËÂØ´
- à§Ô¹Å
§Ò¹ Part Time ãªéà·¤â¹âÅÂշӧҹ᷹¤Ø³ äÁè¡ÃзºµèͪÕÇÔµ»ÃШÓÇѹ¢Í§¤Ø³
äÁèÇèҤس¨Ðà»ç¹ã¤Ã ¤Ø³µéͧ¡ÒçҹÍÂèÒ§¹ÕéËÃ×Íà»ÅèÒ ??
- âÍ¡ÒÊ·Õè¨Ðà»ç¹à¨éҢͧ¡Ô¨¡ÒÃẺ§èÒ æ
- ÁÕ¸ØáԨ¢Í§µ¹àͧº¹ Internet ( E-Commerce )
- à»Ô´´Óà¹Ô¹§Ò¹µÅÍ´ 24 ªÑèÇâÁ§µèÍÇѹ 7ÇѹµèÍÊÑ»´ÒËì
365Çѹã¹Ë¹Ö觻ÕäÁèÁÕÇѹËÂØ´
- à§Ô¹Å
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> I believe you are thinking of pid's (process ID's), not uid's (user ID's).
Yes, you're right. Serves me for trying to do email after a long
night of hacking at perverse bit-twiddling scripts.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacker
15 matches
Mail list logo
