Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> but that's not the point ;] icc will desperately fail on this because
> the header files don't fit.
> the headers coming with icc fit icc very well (of course) but don't fit
> our system headers and the libs (some functions are being used in
> templates which are
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:17:17 -0800 Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > > Try this patch:
> > >
> > > --- bad Sat Mar 30 05:18:02 2002
> > > +++ goodSat Mar 30 05:18:23 2002
> > > @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> > > -echo '#include' > comp.cc
> > > +echo '#inclu
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Ron Chen wrote:
> --- Baldur Gislason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See top(1), either parse the output from that in
> > batch mode, or use the
> > source luke, the source!
> >
> > Baldur
>
> In fact, I looked for the source before I asked. But I
> need it in tar.gz format,
I wouldn't necessarily get too excited about using icc
for compiling operating systems. The company I work
for
uses gcc for compiling its file server OS. People
their have, however, experimented with using icc for
builds. When they used feedback profiling from SFS
i.e. to determine which branches
> I respect the gcc effort, but if icc is as good as it is told to be
> then it could supersede (at least in intel community) gcc.
> What is the general sentiment and the will for cooperation about
> porting icc to FreeBSD?
I doubt that porting will be necessary; I've watched another developer
(
I was just looking into the icc port on FreeBSD.
It tells on freshports site that it does not produce
native executables but objects and linux compatibility
base is necessary. Is it possible (with cooperation with
intel) to completely port icc to FreeBSD (and make it
compatible with libc so that i
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > --- bad Sat Mar 30 05:18:02 2002
> > +++ goodSat Mar 30 05:18:23 2002
> > @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> > -echo '#include' > comp.cc
> > +echo '#include ' > comp.cc
> > +echo 'main() {}' >> comp.cc
>
> glibness aside, this doesn't work either:
Works with g++... though I expect
> --- bad Sat Mar 30 05:18:02 2002
> +++ goodSat Mar 30 05:18:23 2002
> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> -echo '#include' > comp.cc
> +echo '#include ' > comp.cc
> +echo 'main() {}' >> comp.cc
glibness aside, this doesn't work either:
flapjack:/home/nick> echo '#include ' > comp.cc
flapjack:/home
If you sell, install or make cabinets, take a moment. This
product is well worth looking into.
1. Reduce damage to cabinets tremendously;
2. The faces of the cabinets will be flush, the tops and bottoms even;
3. Cuts installation time by 1/2 or more with less fatigue;
4.
"Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Don't they teach "History of Computing" to people any more?!?
>
> They didn't offer it to me when I was studing for my BSEE in the 70s.
> (And I haven't been paying nearly as much attention as you have.)
>
> I hate to th
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > Try this patch:
> >
> > --- bad Sat Mar 30 05:18:02 2002
> > +++ goodSat Mar 30 05:18:23 2002
> > @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> > -echo '#include' > comp.cc
> > +echo '#include ' > comp.cc
> > +echo 'main() {}' >> comp.cc
> >
> >
> > 8-) 8-) 8-)
>
> ;] no, that's de
http://www.gpsclock.com/ is $380US and does PPS pulses accurate to
plus or minus 1 microsecond of UTC.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:28:59AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:04:11PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
> > I just connected my gps (garmin gps II
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:22:37AM -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Don't they teach "History of Computing" to people any more?!?
>
> They didn't offer it to me when I was studing for my BSEE in the 70s.
> (And I haven't been paying nearly as muc
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't they teach "History of Computing" to people any more?!?
They didn't offer it to me when I was studing for my BSEE in the 70s.
(And I haven't been paying nearly as much attention as you have.)
I hate to think what my alma mata is teaching for HoC
> In a message written on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:04:11PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
> > I just connected my gps (garmin gps III plus) to my serial port
> > and realized that simply cat'ing cua0 displays date/time/position of the
> > unit. (neato). Anyway, how accurate would it be to use the
On 30 Mär, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> but i can't get icc to compile a single c++ source:
> it always fails on the headers.
>
> just a simple echo '#include' > comp.cc
> won't compile. i've tested the include files of
> o icc
> o gcc 2.95.3 (the one from my base system, 4.5-S)
> o gcc 3.
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 05:16:38 -0800 Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > just a simple echo '#include' > comp.cc
> > won't compile. i've tested the include files of
> > o icc
> > o gcc 2.95.3 (the one from my base system, 4.5-S)
> > o gcc 3.0.4 (from the
In a message written on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:04:11PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote:
> I just connected my gps (garmin gps III plus) to my serial port
> and realized that simply cat'ing cua0 displays date/time/position of the
> unit. (neato). Anyway, how accurate would it be to use the time f
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> Sometimes ago, I heard someone wanted to write a fs example (article?
> howto?) just to teach how to write a real fs under FreeBSD.
>
> I'm looking for this kind of info, any good pointer is welcome...
Unfortunately, as others have pointed out, ther
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> just a simple echo '#include' > comp.cc
> won't compile. i've tested the include files of
> o icc
> o gcc 2.95.3 (the one from my base system, 4.5-S)
> o gcc 3.0.4 (from the ports)
>
> each one gives me a different error.
>
> did anybody already solve this prob
hi hackers, alexander!
i've installed the icc port and trying to compile...
first of all, C source files compile (and then link with gcc). no
problems with that.
but i can't get icc to compile a single c++ source:
it always fails on the headers.
just a simple echo '#include' > comp.cc
won't com
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 01:39:14AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> > > > Anybody know any languages that allow compile-time (and/or link-time)
> > > > computations using (most of?) the same
"Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> > > Anybody know any languages that allow compile-time (and/or link-time)
> > > computations using (most of?) the same language? I've often desired the
> > > feature. (I suppose some preproc
23 matches
Mail list logo
