Hello there!
In FreeBSD headers there are many occurences of 'struct __hack' (e.g.
in src/sys/module.h, eventhandler.h). What's the point of this
structure? I guess it help to avoid some warnings/errors, but what?
Regards,
Alexey.
--
<->
) May the Sun and Water ( R
Respected Sir,
I have two NFS servers acting as backups for each other. We are
working in FreeBSD. Now when a server fails, the other server takes
over the IP address of the failed server on a different Network
Interface. But, now the clients of the failed server are not able to
mount from the
Here is a context diff that fixes the driver. Not the most performant solution
(it requires allocating a new, zero'd, mbuf) but it's the most straightforward
fix. Auto Padding is still on in the driver. I saw no reason to disable this
even
though we're now go around it.
This fix is against -C
Don't the stuff I committed to current do what you guys want? I'm planning
to MFC it, but haven't asked Bruce yet. I'll need it before I MFC the puc
driver.
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I had changes to do this
> BDE refused to commit them.
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb
Patrick Thomas writes:
>
> one other thing:
>
> How many mount points (jails, in this case) can I run ? I see that there
> are 8 existing vn0X device files in /dev - can I just create more of them
> using MAKEDEV (or mknod) and keep going ?
You can use vnXs1a..vnXs30h on each vn
vnconfig -s lab
(asked on -questions and got no response, also did a `sysctl -a | grep
pty` and only saw error messages)
I am trying to troubleshoot something - the bad thing that is happening is
that I try to create new `screen` windows and I get 'No more PTYs'. I
know how to add more PTYs, etc., and I am not
> At 13:10 19/02/02 -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> >Bob Bishop writes:
> >| No dice with last night's -STABLE. And it's definitely the interface, I've
> >| tried a variety and netatalk works with everything (including the dreaded
> >| Via Rhine) except for the onboard sis0.
> >|
> >| I suppose it's
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Is this supported?
: Cannot seem to find this version at
: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.5-RELEASE/HARDWARE.HTM
If this is a USB ethernet chip, then I just got done reviewing a
driver from someone
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:26:49AM -0500, Clark C . Evans wrote:
>
> | http://people.freebsd.org/~bsd/cdroot/
>
> Ok. I've tried this route and it seems to be working,
> thank you all so much for your help and pointers.
Whoops, sorry. I just replied to your earlier mail mentioning these
scrip
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 06:23:31PM -0500, Clark C . Evans wrote:
>
> Hello. I was wondering if it is possible to make a read-only
> boot partition (core kernel, static configuration, and /usr)
> for a web-farm application.
I've put together a few scripts to help set this up. I've been
happily
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
> > Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
> > are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
> > when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
> > operate on (struct user) will not be
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
> > Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
> > are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
> > when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
> > operate on (struct user) will not be
> Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
> are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
> when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
> operate on (struct user) will not be around much longer since it
> is part-per-process
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Now that ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...) has been excised how does one
> find out what actions are registered for various signals?
> The ups debugger needs this. Please see
> /usr/ports/devel/ups-debug/work/ups-3.35-beta13/ups/ao_pt_uarea.c:632
>
> Thanks!
>
H
Patrick Thomas wrote:
> How many mount points (jails, in this case) can I run ? I see that there
> are 8 existing vn0X device files in /dev - can I just create more of them
> using MAKEDEV (or mknod) and keep going ?
>
> What is the maximum ? 256 ?
Depends. Expect 256 to be available in all v
>Regarding my SMP query, Doc asks:
> > What sort of throughput? What sort of processes are you
> > running? Do you
> > actually have multiple processes fighting for CPU?
>
>Yes, I'm using netperf, iperf or nttcp to measure TCP throughput using the
>server (the box in question) in response to ten
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:45:59PM -0500, Jim Durham wrote:
> I've looked over the mailing lists and google and I can't figure out
> if the patches to the 5.0 kernel to support ACLs in Samba ever made
> it into 4.4 or 4.5 Release ?
No, and I don't think a merge is planned because of the scope o
At 09:46 28-2-2002 -0600, Theodore Hope wrote:
>We've tried installing Oracle 8.1.7.0.1 (for Linux) under
>FreeBSD 4.5-release and end up with two "jre" processes
>eating all the CPU and the infamous
>"kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled" message scrolling on
>the console. This has been report
Is this supported?
Cannot seem to find this version at
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.5-RELEASE/HARDWARE.HTM
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
one other thing:
How many mount points (jails, in this case) can I run ? I see that there
are 8 existing vn0X device files in /dev - can I just create more of them
using MAKEDEV (or mknod) and keep going ?
What is the maximum ? 256 ?
also, do I need to alter the kernel to support more vn0X d
I've looked over the mailing lists and google and I can't figure out
if the patches to the 5.0 kernel to support ACLs in Samba ever made
it into 4.4 or 4.5 Release ?
--
Jim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
thank you - I am glad to see that this is a good way of doing things. Two
quick items:
1. How do I give each jail a 'proc' filesystem in its /proc using this
configuration ?
2. Is there any downside to this whatsoever ? This seems infinitely
better than a new partition for each jail, so was I
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > If its actually a Realtek clone with a few differences it wouldn't make
> > sense to add a whole new driver to the system.
>
> Just a side note; the Realtek driver isn't entirely up to date. Th
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> I have been speaking with the author.
>> he is adding a BSD copyright.
>> also he says we can KNFify (style(9)ify?) as it doesn't have to
>> remain
>> compatible with anything else.
>
> It might be nice if it could be folded into the driver it was
This is not so relevant because he is NOT RUNNING old hardware!
(well not THAT old).
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Frost, Stephen C" wrote:
> > This includes multiple configurations, incl: dual PIII 700s, dual PIII 800s,
> > quad PIII Zeon 550s, etc... No old procs, per se. I'm
"Frost, Stephen C" wrote:
> This includes multiple configurations, incl: dual PIII 700s, dual PIII 800s,
> quad PIII Zeon 550s, etc... No old procs, per se. I'm running the released
> version of 4.5. Was a proc-specific fix implemented *after* its release?
There is code in 4.5 that is incredib
* Frost, Stephen C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020228 11:44] wrote:
>
> This includes multiple configurations, incl: dual PIII 700s, dual PIII 800s,
> quad PIII Zeon 550s, etc... No old procs, per se. I'm running the released
> version of 4.5. Was a proc-specific fix implemented *after* its release?
I'm crossposting to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as per suggestion.
My original post, edited:
> > ... why any kernels compiled with SMP enabled seem
> > to be slowing the whole system down? Throughput goes down by 40%.
Tasks
> > take twice as long to run, etc, etc...
> > ... it appears to be system-wide
I had changes to do this
BDE refused to commit them.
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Luuk van Dijk wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --17932B47B695003DFEDACE26
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> L.S.
>
> for a project in
Hi,
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:20:57 +1100
> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
edwin> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:38:28PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> Finally I figured out the problem.
edwin> Thanks for these two patches, it works like a charm now!
I just commit
We've tried installing Oracle 8.1.7.0.1 (for Linux) under
FreeBSD 4.5-release and end up with two "jre" processes
eating all the CPU and the infamous
"kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled" message scrolling on
the console. This has been reported before by others, and
I'm wondering if anyone ha
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--17932B47B695003DFEDACE26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
L.S.
for a project in which I communicate with embedded controllers in cars I
need to read and write serial data at weird speeds of 5 and
32 matches
Mail list logo
