On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:56:13PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Right now one must hardcode compile the BPS rate into the kernel for
> serial consoles. This is just ridden with problems when machines move,
> or configurations shared.
>
> It would be really nice if the kernel would get the BPS r
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 05:45 pm, raymond hicks wrote:
> The last of the irritating factors of using such device that I have
> found is that when trying to verify connectivity from behind the cable
> modem, forget using ping or any ping related utility such as
> traceroute; the cable mode
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 09:51 pm, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> At first, I tried looking for support under FreeBSD but
> found none. Then, I tried to get it working under Linux since it
> seems to be supported. I'll spare the details since this is not the
> place for non-FreeB
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 02:31 pm, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > From: Brian T.Schellenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:17:27 -0500
> >
> > On Wednesday 30 January 2002 12:53 pm, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:09:14 +0300 (MSK)
> > > > From: Varshavch
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Right now one must hardcode compile the BPS rate into the kernel for
: serial consoles. This is just ridden with problems when machines move,
: or configurations shared.
:
: It would be really nice if the k
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jonathan Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the responses. Any chance the miidevs hack and phy
> workarounds will make it into -current or FreeBSD 4.5?
I'm not going to commit anything unless/until I get the driver working
properly with the 5701, inc
I would give Insure a try if you can't afford Purify. Either one is better
than just about anything else you'll find in the open source world.
ron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Right now one must hardcode compile the BPS rate into the kernel for
serial consoles. This is just ridden with problems when machines move,
or configurations shared.
It would be really nice if the kernel would get the BPS rate from a
loader environmental var instead of having it hard coded.
--
Robert Suetterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm neither proficient in C++ nor efficient in
> debugging, so I stumble around the problem rather blindfolded. Once
> I blamed the compiler, systemlibraries and operating system, I knew
> I needed some help. The problem appeare
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020130 16:09] wrote:
> check where init is called from..
Y'know, exec call could be made into a "do_exec", all that seems
to matter is whether or not uap->fname is UIO_USERSPACE or UIO_SYSSPACE.
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jonathan BENSAMOUN wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
check where init is called from..
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jonathan BENSAMOUN wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to add a new syscall in my kernel which execute an execve in a
> forked process.
> I call the fork1 function and hook inside it to execute my execve.
>
> Has anyone an example of calling execv
The problem I was having with the if_rl driver not working properly when
connected to a 10Mb hub (ie no link partner capabilities) can be fixed by
removing a line with a cryptic comment about broken autonegotiation.
in the file /sys/dev/mii/rlphy.c:
void
rlphy_reset(sc)
struct mii_sof
If that is the case... then the cable modem should have an address on
the LAN side of it.. something like 192.168.100.1 which should be
accessable via web browser. That is how the surfboard cable modems are
managed. Once other thing is that the cable modem will fail to connect
from Netscape as t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Malone writes:
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:41:05AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
>> Yes, there are quite a few mysterious workarounds in that driver.
[...]
>but I suspect the chip is just plain broken. Where can you get the
>Linux driver from? I might try ste
Hi,
I would like to add a new syscall in my kernel which execute an execve in a
forked process.
I call the fork1 function and hook inside it to execute my execve.
Has anyone an example of calling execve from kernel ?
I have some problem to pass the arguments ...
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: send mai
On Wednesday, 30 January 2002 at 9:41:15 -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> Caldera's License Agreement:
>
> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf
Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It
implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it does
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had alot of trouble with the builtin card in our Dell 2550s.
> I'm going to try swapping hardware to see if we've got a bad
> machine, but I suspect the chip is just plain broken.
Well, it seems to work OK with the L
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:41:05AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> > From investigating the Linux driver, I gather there are a few features
> > in these chips which may need workarounds (e.g., the Debian driver
> > includes a new firmware image for some 5701 revs'; and forces master
> > mode in some
I can't guess what does it mean by "hiding". Maybe any system call can be
hidden from some configuration of the kernel.
-Zhihui
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:58:16PM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> >
> > While adding a system call, I notice in file sysca
On Wed, 2002/01/30 at 07:02:25 -0800, User JHB wrote:
> When the DEADLKTREAT flag was added, uiomove() was broken. :) The
> problem is that a return() inside of a switch nested inside of a while
> loop was converted to a break leading to the following rather silly code:
>
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jonathan Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this
>
> I just got a 3com 3c996B-T with a bcm5701 chip. It doesn't work with a
> kernel built from 4.5-RC source pulled Friday: the gigabit phy goes
> unrecognized, get
Brent Verner writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've been searching for info regarding mounting the same device
> to multiple locations in the filesystem, i.e...
>
> # mount /dev/ad0s1e /usr
> # mount -r /dev/ad0s1e /var/jail//usr
> # mount -r /dev/ad0s1e /var/jail//usr
There was a time I mounted the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:57:37PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stijn Hoop writes:
> >On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> >> A FreeBSD 1.X CVS tree has been found, which has it's first import as
> >> 386BSD 0.1 + PK 024. There are
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stijn Hoop writes:
>
>--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
>> A FreeBSD 1.X CVS tree has been found,
> > A FreeBSD 1.X CVS tree has been found, which has it's first import as
> > 386BSD 0.1 + PK 024. There are a couple minor points that need to be
> > clarified from Caldera before it can be made public.
>
> Just curious, but will this be folded in the main CVS tree, or will it be
> available as
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> A FreeBSD 1.X CVS tree has been found, which has it's first import as
> 386BSD 0.1 + PK 024. There are a couple minor points that need to be
> clarified from Caldera before it can be made public.
Just curious, but will this be fold
> > >> Caldera's License Agreement:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf
> > >
> > >Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It
> > >implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it doesn't give explicit
> > >release of said source code.
> >
> > Well
hello everybody!
i am trying to accomplish this (should be fairly easy) task:
cvsupping /usr/ports & /usr/src on a central file server.
and building world/kernel via nfs mounts.
in order not to get things mixed up i share /usr/ports and /usr/src ro and
/usr/ports/distfiles, /usr/obj rw.
shoul
> Once again Unix actually used this, the DEC OSes did not, so Unix was the
first to
> find the bugs in this hardware too.
I think the first sentence is not true. The RT-11 XM monitor uses the MMU
hardware
intensively even before Unix came to utilize it. I'm not talking about
RSX-11, RSTS-E and
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As far as I remember from reading the Lyons' book, there were
> 16 mapping descriptors for text and data each. I think, 1/16
> of the address space is not too big, and in absolute values
> it's the size of today's pages (4KB).
well I had dropped thi
When the DEADLKTREAT flag was added, uiomove() was broken. :) The
problem is that a return() inside of a switch nested inside of a while
loop was converted to a break leading to the following rather silly code:
if (error)
break;
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:42:22AM -0500, raymond hicks wrote:
> uni-directional cable? What kind of connection does your friend have?
He lives in a area where both isdn and adsl do not work. Furthermore,
much for his dismay, bi-directional "cable" (actually radio) does not
work due to
If I recall correctly, doesn't the surfboard 1000-1100 service
uni-directional cable? What kind of connection does your friend have?
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario Sergio
Fujikawa Ferreira
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:5
Hello everyone!
I have a problem using some third party C++ library. After
returning from a seemingly innocent function call my stack frame gets
destroyed step by step --- and maybe other parts of memory as well.
Unfortunately I'm neither proficient in C++ nor efficient in
debuggi
man mount_nullfs.
Remember to read the warning at the bottom of the man page.
kt
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:14:35PM -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> brent> I've been searching for info regarding mounting the same device
> brent> to multiple locations in the filesystem, i.e...
>
> brent> #
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:53:41PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Williams write
> s:
>
> >> Caldera's License Agreement:
> >>
> >> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf
> >
> >Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It
>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:58:16PM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> While adding a system call, I notice in file syscall-hide.h there are
> many instances of HIDE_POSIX() and HIDE_BSD(). What is the purpose of
> these macros? Maybe they are now obsolete?
The syscalls-hide.h file was generated fro
37 matches
Mail list logo
