On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:25:02AM +0200, shupilov wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Tuesday, December 18, 2001, 6:17:30 PM, you wrote:
>
> RE> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 05:33:34PM +0300, aka50 wrote:
> >> Hello freebsd-hackers,
> >>
> >> FreeBSD 4.3 RELEASE.
> >>
> >> I tried to use nat
Hello everybody,
Tuesday, December 18, 2001, 6:17:30 PM, you wrote:
RE> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 05:33:34PM +0300, aka50 wrote:
>> Hello freebsd-hackers,
>>
>> FreeBSD 4.3 RELEASE.
>>
>> I tried to use natd transparent proxing ability with encode_ip_hdr
>> type. I found strang
Any possiblity of incorporating the %busy stats in iostat for 4.5, I
know that it's available in systat, but it would be great if iostat
would show this detailed info as well. If it makes things easier, I
submitted a patch against -stable back on Aug 27th:
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:28:06 -070
I was told that this would be the more appropiate place to send my
question. I am not currently subscribed to the list, so please Cc: all
msg's too my email. Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:41:55 +0100
From: Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Josh <[EM
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Mike Bristow wrote:
>
> >I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
> >fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
> >be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd t
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > By the way the journaling filesystems don't neccessary guarantee that
> > you won't need fsck: for example, if VXFS crashes at a particularly
> > bad moment, it will require you to do "fsck -o full" which is as slow
> > as the fsck on traditional UFS.
>
> Yeah, but tha
* Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011218 19:45] wrote:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >
> > In the last episode (Dec 18), Mike Bristow said:
> > > I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
> > > fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
> >
Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> In the last episode (Dec 18), Mike Bristow said:
> > I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
> > fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
> > be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust data to a port of
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:24:28AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :genius# ps -axl -M vmcore.15 -N kernel.15=20
> :(attached file)
> :
> :The back traces for the processes locked in inode is also attached.
> :
> :Being green to debugging this kind of thing what should I do next?
> :
> :Joe
>
>
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Mike Bristow wrote:
>I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
>fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
>be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust data to a port of
>JFS or XFS.
This is a killer feature
I have a userland program that canpanic/reboot a freebsd 4.3 system.
Hardware is Intel isp1100 (mbx440 motherboard) 850MHZ pIII, 256mb ram, 640mb
swapfile
software is 'nessusd' (network security scanner) hits the ethernet port
pretty hard when running.
If I read the dumpdev right, it is crashing i
:genius# ps -axl -M vmcore.15 -N kernel.15=20
:(attached file)
:
:The back traces for the processes locked in inode is also attached.
:
:Being green to debugging this kind of thing what should I do next?
:
:Joe
Please backtrace the processes stuck in 'vfscac' as well. Actually,
backtrac
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Petr Holub wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've encountered really awful behavior of my SMC card using
> tx driver in FreeBSD 4.3. On 100 Mbps network I get the throughput
> just about 200 kBps :-( Colleagues of mine running some PC
> based routers have very similar experiences wi
Now I know FreeBSD could defer creating an VM object until the last minute
- when the page fault occurs. Thanks.
-Zhihui
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :What are the backing objects of the stack and heap area of a process's
> :address space? When are they created? I saw the c
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:46:18PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> > I've a similar problem with -current from recent (within the last week
> > or two).
> >
> > genius# ps -axl -M vmcore.15 -N kernel.15
> > (attached file)
> >
> > The back traces for the processes locked in inode is also at
In the last episode (Dec 18), Mike Bristow said:
> I suspect that the background fsck[1] that's available in FreeBSD-current
> fits the bill just as well as JFS or XFS - and I'll also bet that it'll
> be available in a FreeBSD-release before I'd trust data to a port of
> JFS or XFS.
The problems
> UFS/FFS is/are proven through time. Throw in the softupdates technology,
> and you have the upside of journalling, without the downside of journalling.
> No. I'm not going into details, first because I'm not qualified, and second,
> others already have.
I think the bottom line to this whole t
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:59, you wrote:
Hi there,
> if you have docs that actually specify how to control the spdif output,
> send them to me and i'll include it in a future driver version.
>
> -cg
Unfortunately it seems I jumped to soon over it, the PDFs available on the
Cirrus sit
Hi,
I would like to begin a Romanian FreeBSD localization project and I
lack the necessary information like:
* where I should look for appropiate documentation
* what are the places L10N is needed
* appropiate procedure for submiting patches
* advices from skilled people in this area
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 05:33:34PM +0300, aka50 wrote:
> Hello freebsd-hackers,
>
> FreeBSD 4.3 RELEASE.
>
> I tried to use natd transparent proxing ability with encode_ip_hdr
> type. I found strange behaviour in function TcpAliasOut()
> (/usr/src/lib/libalias/alias.c). W
> Any FS that shares code with an existing FS will not flush out
> the full list of problems associated with writing a new FS in
> the context of a FreeBSD system.
how about an implementation of plan9's kfs? it is fairly simple, with
dentries similar to unix inodes, eg.
typedef struct {
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:55:27AM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:41:28PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > If it is a vnode deadlock you have to find which process or
> > processes it is deadlocking against.
> >
> > Do a ps -axl -M vmcore.X -N kernel.X on
Hello freebsd-hackers,
FreeBSD 4.3 RELEASE.
I tried to use natd transparent proxing ability with encode_ip_hdr
type. I found strange behaviour in function TcpAliasOut()
(/usr/src/lib/libalias/alias.c). When packet modified by
ProxyModify() (/usr/src/lib/libalias/ali
Hi all!
I'm struggling my FireWire OHCI based card in my notebook.
I'm using driver from DVTS project (that's what I finally
want to have up and running). I'm running FreeBSD 4.4 Release.
dmesg of my machine is in the attachement (using boot -v).
I've already added proper id for my card in both
Hi all!
I've encountered really awful behavior of my SMC card using
tx driver in FreeBSD 4.3. On 100 Mbps network I get the throughput
just about 200 kBps :-( Colleagues of mine running some PC
based routers have very similar experiences with this driver
(in both 4.3 and 4.4 Rel's) The same card
We saw something very similar to this about a year using FFS and soft
updates when we were building a NAS appliance. The details escape me and I
no longer work the company so I cannot grep the source code but here's what
I remember.
The softupdate code periodically flushes the meta data. There is
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:39:58AM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> >All I can say is... holy shit!
>
> Dude, you kick ass. At work I've been dealing with Linux's crappy NFS
> implementation for years, while FreeBSD has always been pretty d
> I have a Terratec card based on the CS461x chip that comes with an S/PDIF
> optical output which I'd like to use. This feature is available under
Windows
> but not under FreeBSD. I've downloaded some docs from the Crystal
> Semiconductor site but need some help as of where to start from. My idea
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:41:28PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> If it is a vnode deadlock you have to find which process or
> processes it is deadlocking against.
>
> Do a ps -axl -M vmcore.X -N kernel.X on the kernel core,
> pick out all the processes blocked on inode or whate
Hi there hackers,
I have a Terratec card based on the CS461x chip that comes with an S/PDIF
optical output which I'd like to use. This feature is available under Windows
but not under FreeBSD. I've downloaded some docs from the Crystal
Semiconductor site but need some help as of where to start
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 23:03:49 +0800
"Rafter Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. I hope that in the furture the FreeBSD developers will rewrite the system in C++.
As the BeOS developers used to say: NO C++ in the kernel.
Follow that simple rule and you'll be safe :-)
--
Miguel Mendez
:What are the backing objects of the stack and heap area of a process's
:address space? When are they created? I saw the code vm_map_insert(), but
:the object argument given is NULL.
:
:Thanks,
:
:-Zhihui
The backing objects are OBJT_DEFAULT objects. They are typically created
when the
32 matches
Mail list logo
