On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:48:58 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> [ ... Hiten wants someone to GPLify FreeBSD ... ]
>
>> I'm glad you took the time to read the marketting literature.
>>
>> The problem is that porting it is going to be a bit more complicated
>> than
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:45:22 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Hiten Pandya wrote:
>> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
>> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
>
> Not unless you have plans. When I was an IBM employee, they would
> not change the license, and so it's i
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> the license issues dont really affect us...
> after all we have an src/gnu directory... thats what
> it is for... dumping GPL'ed stuff
>
> and talking about GPL, we can even publish the code
> as the GPL license states... after all we are an
> open Source Project, but if
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011211 00:48] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> [ ... Hiten wants someone to GPLify FreeBSD ... ]
>
> > I'm glad you took the time to read the marketting literature.
> >
> > The problem is that porting it is going to be a bit more complicated
> > than jus
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
[ ... Hiten wants someone to GPLify FreeBSD ... ]
> I'm glad you took the time to read the marketting literature.
>
> The problem is that porting it is going to be a bit more complicated
> than just dumping it into src/gnu.
>
> Feel free to take a shot at porting it tho
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
Not unless you have plans. When I was an IBM employee, they would
not change the license, and so it's impossible to ship a CDROM
where it's the boot FS, or boxes on which it is the
Bernd Walter wrote:
> A PCI slot has 4 irq lines named INTA to INTD.
Yes.
> On PCs all slots share the same 4 physical irqs and the lines are
> hardwired on the board in alternating order to each slot.
On newer motherboards, post the Intel SErver Products Division
PCI motherboards, from a year
Mike Smith wrote:
> Er, you don't seem to understand how PCI interrupts work.
>
> You must (for now) pass RF_SHAREABLE in; eventually the PCI code will
> stick it there for you anyway. All PCI interrupts are shareable; you
> can't "ask" for an unshared vector; you get the one you're given, and y
I sent a message about this to -stable last week, but didn't get any
input that resulted in a solution to this problem so...
-stable for the last week or more (I did a make world last week for
the first time in over a month) beeps on and off when SMP is enabled.
The beeping appears to be timed wi
On Dec 10, at 08:22 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :
> :Dave
> :
> :PS, I'm rather honored that such an illustrious group has shown interest
> :enough to even discuss all this with me.
>
> Ha! Just wait until witness one of the many flame wars. First we
> put two people in the ring and
:
:Dave
:
:PS, I'm rather honored that such an illustrious group has shown interest
:enough to even discuss all this with me.
Ha! Just wait until witness one of the many flame wars. First we
put two people in the ring and one gets thrown to the lions, then
everyone else jumps into
> Most current users will probably not like the speed penalties of a
> journal file system, and stick to the faster FS. On the other hand a
> solid journal FS may encourage more take up for back end databases, for
> e-commerce, data warehousing, etc...
The transaction support of JFS isn't really
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
>> > This is why the inte_aton() call is still necessary.
>> [snip]
>> > Please call inet_aton(), and then _only_ if that fails, call the
>> > gethostbyname().
>>
>> How about inet_pton() and getnameinfo()?
> You know, I first thought of this, but then I backed off it.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anthony Schneider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> > perhaps there could be an upgrade to offer
>> >options SOFTERUPDATES
>> > as an equal-but-different alternative to jfs?
>>
>> And what would that do?
>
>My thoughts were that if the two were similar in effect t
> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 17:47:11 -0500, Anthony Schneider wrote:
> > I'm no expert on journaled filesystems, but isn't the freebsd softupdates
> > option similar?
>
> No, at least not from a technical standpoint. From a user standpoint,
> they both try to make things faster and more rel
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
>On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 17:47:11 -0500, Anthony Schneider wrote:
>> perhaps there could be an upgrade to offer
>> options SOFTERUPDATES
>> as an equal-but-different alternative to jfs?
>
>And what would that do?
SOFTERUPDATES includes a switch
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 10:56:17 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 17:39:35 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>>> * Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:02] wrote:
hi all,
this is a wild idea...suggestion...
i wanted to ask if there were
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Long-short syndrome in first message.
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 14:01:53 -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> hi all,
>
> this is a wild idea...suggestion...
>
> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> JFS (Journaled F
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> Don't get me wrong - I don't expect the same level of support from the
> FreeBSD Project than I would from, say, Sybase or Sun. Having said that,
> I think FreeBSD's is outstanding, even compared to some other commercial
> *cough*Microsquish(tm)*cough*
On Dec 10, at 05:21 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
>
> > So, my question is then, just what is the policy defining
> > non-current-but- still-supported-releases?
> >
> > [SNIP]
>
> It depends on the level of work required, I expect. Right now
hi,
the license issues dont really affect us...
after all we have an src/gnu directory... thats what
it is for... dumping GPL'ed stuff
and talking about GPL, we can even publish the code
as the GPL license states... after all we are an
open Source Project, but if we were commercial...
it wo
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:38:04PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> Damn it, fat fingered it...corrections to firewall:
>
>
> ipfw add 500 divert natd1 ip from $NET to 0.0.0.0/1 out via $DSL_INT#1
> ipfw add 550 divert natd1 ip from 0.0.0.0/1 to any in via $DSL_INT#1
> ipfw add 560 fwd $
I'm no expert on journaled filesystems, but isn't the freebsd softupdates
option similar? perhaps there could be an upgrade to offer
options SOFTERUPDATES
as an equal-but-different alternative to jfs?
-Anthony.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:39:35PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > * Hite
* Matthew Emmerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:40] wrote:
> > * Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:02] wrote:
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > > this is a wild idea...suggestion...
> > >
> > > i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> > > JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
> >
> * Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:02] wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > this is a wild idea...suggestion...
> >
> > i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> > JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
> >
> > as for JFS, it is developed by IBM for Linux and
> > is licensed under
> A PCI slot has 4 irq lines named INTA to INTD.
> On PCs all slots share the same 4 physical irqs and the lines are
> hardwired on the board in alternating order to each slot.
Not necessarily. This is the classic barber-pole or "PCI swizzle";
it's not mandated for motherboard designs though (bu
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> So, my question is then, just what is the policy defining
> non-current-but- still-supported-releases?
>
> Right now, these is exactly one such release, 4.3, for security fixes.
> Will there always be exactly one, such that when 4.5 is released, 4.3
* Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:02] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> this is a wild idea...suggestion...
>
> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
>
> as for JFS, it is developed by IBM for Linux and
> is licensed under GPL, so we could
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:59:24PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> Right now, these is exactly one such release, 4.3, for security fixes.
> Will there always be exactly one, such that when 4.5 is released, 4.3
> will fall off the planet, and 4.4 takes its place? Or might there be two,
> 4.3 and 4.4?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:01:53PM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> hi all,
>
> this is a wild idea...suggestion...
>
> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
Hi Hiten,
Search the mail list archives (from www.freebsd.org) for JFS and XFS.
You'
hi all,
this is a wild idea...suggestion...
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
as for JFS, it is developed by IBM for Linux and
is licensed under GPL, so we could put this into
src/gnu/
It is used on IBM MainFrames and Enterprise servers
On Dec 10, at 03:34 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
>
> > I can backport to 4.2REL and 4.3REL (I have these releases), but I don't
> > have the resources (read: "free partitions") to accomodate 4.1 or 4.4.
>
> For 4.3-RELEASE, there's a RELENG_4_3 bran
On 09-Dec-01 Hiten Pandya wrote:
> hi all,
> is there a reason behind.. why all Windows related
> boot
> options are marked as DOS?...
>
> src/sys/boot/i386/boot0.s
>
> is it because of the 512-byte limit...
Yes. There used to be a 1024 byte boot0 which did use different names (as well
as aut
On Dec 10, at 08:00 AM, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:17:03PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > Seems to me that were I to do this, and I would, it would only be as viable
> > as the patches themselves. That is, I (and any contributors) would have to
> > be able to stay abreast
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:38:22PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > Er, you don't seem to understand how PCI interrupts work.
> >
> to Er is human, to ... :-)
>
> The meteor driver was causing problems with the adpatec, so i thought
> if i could reasigne the irq it would help. anyway i think i fo
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> I can backport to 4.2REL and 4.3REL (I have these releases), but I don't
> have the resources (read: "free partitions") to accomodate 4.1 or 4.4.
For 4.3-RELEASE, there's a RELENG_4_3 branch in CVS that security fixes
are committed to; you'd probably
Is this PR-worthy? I am seeing this in both -stable and -current. The lftp
author claims it's our bug, not his.
Jos
- Forwarded message from "Alexander V. Lukyanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:47:16 +0300
From: "Alexander V. Lukyanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jos Back
S. Aeschbacher wrote:
> This is possible, but I did not verify it (what kind of "mucking"
> could cause such kind of behaviour?). most of them are "better"
> residental pipes.
Having a packet filter drop your traffic after you haven't done ARP/DHCP
in a while. But I agree that's pretty far-fet
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:17:03PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> Seems to me that were I to do this, and I would, it would only be as viable
> as the patches themselves. That is, I (and any contributors) would have to
> be able to stay abreast of those things going on in -STABLE that could get
> b
> Er, you don't seem to understand how PCI interrupts work.
>
to Er is human, to ... :-)
The meteor driver was causing problems with the adpatec, so i thought
if i could reasigne the irq it would help. anyway i think i found a work
around.
now the problem is that at full size, 24bit colour, i'm
>what kind of "mucking" could cause such kind of
>behaviour?.
this kind of problem did occur to me several times
with NTL (http://ntl.com/) in UK...
there were installing a Universal Shared Bandwith
Router in their CO (Central Office), after they
installed this piece of sh*t, the bandwith was
th
Hey guys.
heh. Sorry about that, I just fixed it and it all works fine. :-) Exams are
making my brain fry.
Here is the revised patch.
Thanks,
- Evan
--- jail.c Mon Jul 30 06:19:54 2001
+++ jail.modMon Dec 10 14:00:57 2001
@@ -10,9 +10,8 @@
*
*/
-#include
+#include
#include
Hi
[snip]
> Actually, it sounds like your provider actively mucks with the link
> after a certain time - are these "residential" pipes? If so, they may do
This is possible, but I did not verify it (what kind of "mucking" could
cause such kind of behaviour?).
most of them are "better" residental pi
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:52:22AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> stick it there for you anyway. All PCI interrupts are shareable; you
> can't "ask" for an unshared vector; you get the one you're given, and you
> should be thankful for that much. Lots of people are going without these
> days. 8(
> hi,
> in trying to make a klm out of the meteor driver, and in
> the process im stumbling onto some problems - major understatment :-)
>
> for starters, how can i get an unshared irq? at the moment the irq is
> shared among the video, scsi and the meteor.
> im using
> bus_alloc_res
:> be problematic as apparently a number of people are having problems
:> with recent IDE changes, at least judging by recent list postings.
:
:Too many patches have flown by for me to track exactly what files changed
:without errors. Would it be possible to summarize with a list of file
Hi,
while doing some timing measurements on our test boxes, i noticed
that if I compile a kernel with
options HZ=1000
I get a number of stray clock interrupts (i.e. occasionally a
clock interrupts comes way before its due time -- other measurements
showed that the two "regular" clock int
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can anyone suggest a method of determining inside
> libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c if a binary being run is native or linux
> emulation?
If the FreeBSD dynamic linker is running at all, the binary is
probably native. Linux p
Evan Sarmiento wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading this thread. I made the augustments to the
> patch so that it first checks if it is an IP address, if it is not,
> it then tries to see if it is a hostname. If neither are true
> it exits with an error.
>
> Hope this is what you're looking
At 11:18 PM 12/09/2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> However, if you are running 4.4-RELEASE and haven't updated then you
> don't have the patch and it is relevant. While it is a significant
> fix,
> it is just one out of a number of fixes made since 4.4-RELEASE. The
> easiest solut
S. Aeschbacher wrote:
> Hal Snyder wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>Sounds as if the MAC of the upstream provider occasionally changes.
>>Don't know enough about cable to understand it better, and problem is
>>gone now so can't check for sure.
>>
> As far as my cases are concerned, the MAC address does no
I created an address to use with send-pr, and it's been getting spam.
Perhaps mail sent with send-pr can have the addresses slightly munged
before they're placed on a web page?
Is there a more appropriate list for discussing this?
--
Ben
"An art scene of delight
I created this to be ..."
Hello,
I've been reading this thread. I made the augustments to the
patch so that it first checks if it is an IP address, if it is not,
it then tries to see if it is a hostname. If neither are true
it exits with an error.
Hope this is what you're looking for,
Evan
--- jail.c Mon Jul 30 06:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 08:29:12AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> You did, eh? Hmm. It didn't show up in the INN mirror I monitor (sol.net
> Network Services, Milwaukee, WI). Sorry.
Ah, INN. It made it to the mailing list.
> As long as the user/admin understands that the patch is very target-
>
On Dec 10, at 08:50 AM, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:41:51AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > [this is a re-post; apparently my first didn't take?]
>
> Nope, we got it. As penance for re-sending, your penance is to
> implement the ideas discussed below. :-)
You did, eh?
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > This is why the inte_aton() call is still necessary.
> [snip]
> > Please call inet_aton(), and then _only_ if that fails, call the
> > gethostbyname().
>
> How about inet_pton() and getnameinfo()?
You know, I first thought of this, but then I backed off it.
The problem
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:41:51AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> [this is a re-post; apparently my first didn't take?]
Nope, we got it. As penance for re-sending, your penance is to
implement the ideas discussed below. :-)
> On Dec 09, at 05:26 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
> Yup. To me, too. But a
[this is a re-post; apparently my first didn't take?]
On Dec 09, at 05:26 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:17:03PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > So far, I've made three patchfiles that can be applied to 4.2REL and 4.3REL.
> > Not exactly the repertoire one would need to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> hi,
> does anyone need any special skills to manage the
> kind of branch you are talking about...
> example.. RELENG_4_4_BUGFIX
>
> what kind of skills and experience in FreeBSD would
> be needed for this kind of branch
I'm
On Dec 09, at 05:26 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:17:03PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > So far, I've made three patchfiles that can be applied to 4.2REL and 4.3REL.
> > Not exactly the repertoire one would need to garner interest and momentum.
>
> Everything starts so
Title: Take Control Of Your Conference Calls
Long Distance
ConferencingOnly 18 Cents Per
Minute
Connects Up To 100 Participants!
No setup fees
No contracts or monthly fees
Call anytime, from anywhere, to anywhere
International Dial In 18 cen
hi,
in trying to make a klm out of the meteor driver, and in
the process im stumbling onto some problems - major understatment :-)
for starters, how can i get an unshared irq? at the moment the irq is
shared among the video, scsi and the meteor.
im using
bus_alloc_resource(dev, S
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:36:14PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Here's an updated patch which is a result of comments from a few
> > people. The changes are: (a) deconfuse the usage message by not
> > naming two arguments as "hostname" (that was sloppiness on my part),
>
Hello, All.
I do not know already where to dig!
Is IPSec the tunnel through dial-up, on it(him) with the help UUCP the file
exchange is organized.
IPSEC.CONF:
#!/bin/sh
flush;
spdflush;
add 10.0.0.51 10.0.0.50 esp 0x10051 -m tunnel
-E 3des-cbc "123456789012345678901234"
-A hmac-sha1 "12345
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:41:43PM +0100, KAISER Laszlo wrote:
> I'm doing a port of a little OpenSSL program to FreeBSD from linux, but the
> code which works fine on linux fails on FreeBSD at SSL_connect().
> This function allways returns with -1 and SSL_errno is 1.
To answer myself;
The probl
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:01:01AM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:23:07PM -0700, Joesh Juphland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a machine whose primary IDE controller is blown. Only the secondary
> > works. So, I connected my single IDe drive as the secondary maste
> Dima Dorfman wrote:
>> Here's an updated patch which is a result of comments from a few
>> people. The changes are: (a) deconfuse the usage message by not
>> naming two arguments as "hostname" (that was sloppiness on my part),
>> and (b) remove a redundant inet_aton call (gethostbyname(3) will
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Mike D wrote:
> > [I think this question should be redirected to -questions or -net, but
> > anyway...]
-Moved to questions.
Nick Rogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Keep on Routing in a Free World...
"FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
> [I think this question should be redirected to -questions or -net, but
> anyway...]
should only programming questions be posted here?
> do you have IPFIREWALL in your kernel ? is is configured "default to
> deny" ? This is typically what is bugginig me when natd fails to write a
> packet : a n
69 matches
Mail list logo
