On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:26:22AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Mike Barcroft, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Just to clarify. This is still a POLA violation. If a log file is
> pulled out from underneath syslogd(8), one wouldn't expect it to start
> logging again, even if the file was re-created. J
Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 08:04:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > I assume you mean "as soon as the configuration file is modified"?
> > > That would be a big violation of POLA.
> >
> > No ...
>
> Yes!
Just to c
void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 08:04:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I assume you mean "as soon as the configuration file is modified"?
> > That would be a big violation of POLA.
>
> No ...
Yes!
> The traditional log-rotation dance goes something like:
>
> mv l
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 08:04:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:39:57PM +0100, void wrote:
> > If syslogd used the kqueue interface, I believe it could open a new log
> > file as soon as it was created, rather than waiting to receive a signal.
> > Would this be worth do
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:39:57PM +0100, void wrote:
> If syslogd used the kqueue interface, I believe it could open a new log
> file as soon as it was created, rather than waiting to receive a signal.
> Would this be worth doing, or would it be too big a divergence from the
> traditional behavio
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:15:28AM +0200, Peter Wullinger wrote:
> Have I just missed, that anoncvs.FreeBSD.org was shut down?
>
> This would be a problem for me since I do not have access to
> a FreeBSD machine with good internet connection and I didn't
> get cvsup (i.e. M3) to compile on the m
If syslogd used the kqueue interface, I believe it could open a new log
file as soon as it was created, rather than waiting to receive a signal.
Would this be worth doing, or would it be too big a divergence from the
traditional behavior?
--
Ben
"An art scene of delight
I created this to be .
I didn't see anything like this in the archives, so I'm sending this to
the questions list and hackers list for assistance.
I am running FreeBSD 4.3 on a L440GX+ motherboard with dual PCI buses: 32/33
and 32/66 dual Pentium III @ 700MHz with 256KB L2 cache.
The system is running in Uniprocessor m
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:48:56AM -0700, rick norman wrote:
> I guess my question then is why did I need to stop the stream and restart
> it before it would show up in the pipe? It seems that if I repeatedly flush,
I cannot reproduce the problem from your description.
If you can post the exact
I guess my question then is why did I need to stop the stream and restart
it before it would show up in the pipe? It seems that if I repeatedly flush,
delete pipes, reinstall pipes, without stopping the data stream, that I get
into
a state where no data will register in the pipes until I stop and
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:22:48AM -0700, rick norman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I seem to get inconsistent outputs from the same dummynet
> stat query. Following is the output from two different queries :
>
> bash-2.05$
> bash-2.05$ ipfw pipe 3 show
> 3: unlimited0 ms 2048 B 0 queues (1 buckets
Hi,
I seem to get inconsistent outputs from the same dummynet
stat query. Following is the output from two different queries :
bash-2.05$
bash-2.05$ ipfw pipe 3 show
3: unlimited0 ms 2048 B 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail
mask: 0x00 0x/0x -> 0x/0x
bash-2.05$
b
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:46:00PM +0100, Bri wrote:
> ok if you into your freebsd box from somewhere else and type su - root and
> then type the root password it just hangs there and you think I'm sure I
> typed the password correctly.
Are you using a serial console? Or, a defferent question, a
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:31:56PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:06:59PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:49:08PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > O
Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:06:59PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:49:08PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> [snip]
> > > >
> > > > On the step 3, when marshalling results of the call, daemon
> > > > creates a larg
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:06:59PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:49:08PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
[snip]
> > >
> > > On the step 3, when marshalling results of the call, daemon
> > > creates a large collection of small buffers (usually 5
Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:49:08PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Ian Dowse wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writ
> > > es:
> > > > Nautilus from working properly. The problem disappeared when I've replaced
> > > > writev(2) call with a
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:21:37PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> In some email I received from Arjan de Vet, sie wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >How many of the patches at http://labs.gr/~charon/patches/ should go into
> > >FreeBSD-current ?
> >
> > I wrote similar patches
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:49:08PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Ian Dowse wrote:
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writ
> > es:
> > > Nautilus from working properly. The problem disappeared when I've replaced
> > > writev(2) call with appropriate loop based around ordinary
Ian Dowse wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writ
> es:
> > Nautilus from working properly. The problem disappeared when I've replaced
> > writev(2) call with appropriate loop based around ordinary write(2). Perhaps
> > this should be investigated and the real source of t
ok if you into your freebsd box from somewhere else and type su - root and
then type the root password it just hangs there and you think I'm sure I
typed the password correctly.
So then you u think ok the the SSH session died for some reason try to log
back in via ssh and you can't and when you t
In some email I received from Arjan de Vet, sie wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
> >How many of the patches at http://labs.gr/~charon/patches/ should go into
> >FreeBSD-current ?
> >
> >Darren
>
> I wrote similar patches (see http://home.iae.nl/users/devet/freebsd/)
> trying
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>How many of the patches at http://labs.gr/~charon/patches/ should go into
>FreeBSD-current ?
>
>Darren
I wrote similar patches (see http://home.iae.nl/users/devet/freebsd/)
trying to fix more or less the same bugs/problems.
Maybe it's a good idea if Gi
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> To do what you want, which is to clean the backing pages, you
Yes, i mean cleaning pages in the backing storage.
> are better off doing it for all freed blocks, not just swap
> blocks (if someone can read your swap, they can read other data
> off you
In some email I received from Giorgos Keramidas, sie wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:45:11PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >
> > I get the feeling this - inappropriate - setting of a _program
> > variable is due to my misguided suggestion in PR conf/20202
> > which verbatimly made it into the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:30:04AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:15:28AM +0200, Peter Wullinger wrote:
> anoncvs mirrors are currently under discussion on -hubs.
>
> Rest assured, this problem *is* going to be fixed :)
>
Sorry for the crosspost ...
Thanks anyway,
Pe
26 matches
Mail list logo
