[[ Please excuse me for replying to a one year old message, but I have
a question or two ]]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
: ." Loading /boot/current.conf. Please wait..." cr
: s" /boot/current.conf" read-conf
What's
| I have written a server program that listens on port 3000. The program
| works very well except for one feature. I am asking if that is normal,
| or whether I forgot something.
|
| If I run the program it does fine. If I then kill the program (after it
| has accepted connections), and then
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 18:39:20 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:38:20 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 12:26:10 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 4) Supply the ou
Hi Greg,
I apologise in advance if this message is too long.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:38:20 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>
> On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 12:26:10 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I posted a messag
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> listenfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0);
> bzero(&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr));
> servaddr.sin_family=AF_INET;
> servaddr.sin_addr.s_addr=htonl(INADDR_ANY);
> servaddr.sin_port=htons(3000);
> if (bind(listenfd,(struct sockaddr*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr)
Hello,
Since the relaes for 5.0 was extended another year, an interesting
feature I'd like to see go in to the kernel is hooks. So users
can add extra security checks.. etc. There's a project in its
beginnings right now,
www.freesoftware.fsf.org/jailuser/
Think anyone could join the prfw mailing
You should always use perror or strerror if a system call fails so you know
*why* it fails. Then you can cross-references with the man(2) and man(3) pages
to figure out what's up.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> I have written a server program that listens on port 3000.
I have written a server program that listens on port 3000. The program
works very well except for one feature. I am asking if that is normal,
or whether I forgot something.
If I run the program it does fine. If I then kill the program (after it
has accepted connections), and then run the progr
:What about changing this to __FBSD(), which is what I was using in a
:prototype to reduce the number of characters in the macro name (and thus
:reduce the wrap around).
:
:--
:-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
__FBSD() is too generic for a #define name in what is essentially a
global head
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 06:35:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Especially the empty line after the copyright message:
Agreed.
> __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/lib/libatm/atm_addr.c,v 1.6 2001/09/15 19:36:55 dillon Exp
>$");
What about changing this to __FBSD(), which is what I was using in a
protot
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 04:34:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001 21:52:06 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:26:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > I posted a message to -hackers several days ago, complete with a kernel
> > > backtra
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001 21:52:06 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:26:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > I posted a message to -hackers several days ago, complete with a kernel
> > backtrace.The panic is 100% reproducible on my machine running the
> > latest -stab
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:05:01PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > 'disklabel -B ad0' as root, where 'ad0' is the disk that boots FreeBSD
>
> Isn't `disklable -B ad0sX' more proper? (especially if the disk has
> multiple FreeBSD slices)
I tried ad0s3 and the system wa
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:13:58PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: > : It is best to order this from largest to smallest size if you are worried
: > : about alignment holes, etc.
: > :
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> I'm redirecting this to freebsd-hackers.
>
> Ok, I've comitted a new set of changes to libatm. Please check them out.
> When we get a format that enough people are happy with we can start
> converting the other libraries. I'm not particu
On 15-Sep-01 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:05:01PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> 'disklabel -B ad0' as root, where 'ad0' is the disk that boots FreeBSD
>
> Isn't `disklable -B ad0sX' more proper? (especially if the disk has
> multiple FreeBSD slices)
On x86, yes. I think d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:13:58PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> unfortunately, there are many device structures that are passed around
>> via DMA and hte like that don't let you do this...
>
>How come? The struct represents some [semi-]p
I think that burncd is a good program, and I appreciate the development of
it, but I feel that there may be a better solution for owners of atapi
burners. cdrecord is basically an industry standard, and should be able to
be used by owers of atapi burners under FreeBSD. Linux has a driver called
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:13:58PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : It is best to order this from largest to smallest size if you are worried
> : about alignment holes, etc.
> :
> : int64_t d; /* 8-byte boundary */
> : int32_t c; /* 4-
Added spinlock support, so that libc functions are reentrant.
This is based on the Aug 3 release from the NGPT project.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=30599
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> Don- too bad- I'm over in NAS in building N-258 and just took down the h/w
> where we could test this (Alpha 4100 with 8 Qlogic cards && 8 150GB MegaDrive
> RAID arrays)- We're excessing this equipment because the mass storage gro
Don- too bad- I'm over in NAS in building N-258 and just took down the h/w
where we could test this (Alpha 4100 with 8 Qlogic cards && 8 150GB MegaDrive
RAID arrays)- We're excessing this equipment because the mass storage group's
work was terminated due to budgetary goop.
Typically there's no p
I probably SHOULD know this, but how can I get a 1.3 TB
RAID 5 array recognized by FBD 4.3 (Or, 4.4 RC5) ?
Thanks for reading this,
Don
---
Don Sullivan
NASA Ames Research Center
MS 242-4
Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: It is best to order this from largest to smallest size if you are worried
: about alignment holes, etc.
:
: int64_t d; /* 8-byte boundary */
: int32_t c; /* 4-byte boundary */
: int32_t f; /* 4-byte boundary */
: int
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:23:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> E.g., will the following structure:
> struct foo {
> };
> contain alignment holes in any architecture/compiler?
It is best to order this from largest to smallest size if you are worried
about alignment holes, etc.
int64_t d; /
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:05:01PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> 'disklabel -B ad0' as root, where 'ad0' is the disk that boots FreeBSD
Isn't `disklable -B ad0sX' more proper? (especially if the disk has
multiple FreeBSD slices)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
Sansonetti Laurent wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to store a function in kernel memory using KVM interface ?
>
> I have written a tty spy'er, which simply hijack discipline line entries for
> a tty, and as you know probably, those routines must be situated in kernel
> land.
>
> I know that
Sansonetti Laurent wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to store a function in kernel memory using KVM interface ?
>
> I have written a tty spy'er, which simply hijack discipline line entries for
> a tty, and as you know probably, those routines must be situated in kernel
> land.
>
> I know that
"Sansonetti Laurent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think there's an error in man page for kvm_nlist(3): a reference to
> kldsym(2) which doesn't exist in the manual...
>
> pinux@arrakis ~> man kvm_nlist | grep kldsym
> kldsym(2) is used to locate the symbol. This is a less than pe
Hi,
Is there a way to store a function in kernel memory using KVM interface ?
I have written a tty spy'er, which simply hijack discipline line entries for
a tty, and as you know probably, those routines must be situated in kernel
land.
I know that I should use KLD for that, but i'm still curiou
Hi,
I think there's an error in man page for kvm_nlist(3): a reference to
kldsym(2) which doesn't exist in the manual...
pinux@arrakis ~> man kvm_nlist | grep kldsym
kldsym(2) is used to locate the symbol. This is a less than perfect
emu-
kldsym(2), kvm(3), kvm_close(3), kvm_getarg
Am Samstag, 15. September 2001 um 07:33 schrieb Stephen Hurd:
>> ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 191 of 64-79 (ad0s1 bn 191; cn 0 tn
>> 3
>> sn 2) retrying
>
> Actually, the ICRC error IS a bit frigtening... I always got read timeouts
> when it was a bad HD/controller combo... I'd like to
It seems glenn gombert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running FreeBSD Current and having a problem with my Memorx CRW-1662
> CD-Writer and trying to use it with 'burncd'. I tried to write a small
> test 'iso' Image that I made using mkisofa and got the following error
> message "MODE_SELECT_BIG - Ill
33 matches
Mail list logo
