In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dima Dorfman writes:
: I thought about this, too. Right now there isn't a way to do that,
: and neither OpenBSD nor NetBSD have one AFAIK. That said, I think it
: would be trivial to implement. The list of options and devices is a
: simple linked list (mind you, i
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:47:41PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
> > sysctl -A |grep forward
> > net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
> > net.inet.ip.fastforwarding: 0
> > machdep.forward_irq_enabled: 1
> > machdep.forward_signal_enabled: 1
> > machdep.forward_roundrobin_enabled: 1
> >
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
> > Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> > > > Wes Peters said on Jun 23, 2001 at 23:28:42:
> > > > > > Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
> > > > > > Of course, they s
Steve Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:51:47PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > The crucial bottleneck for this kind of thing is the doubling
> > time. Unless your special purpose hardware doubles in speed as fast or
> > faster than general purpose CPUs, then eventually it'
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:51:47PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> The crucial bottleneck for this kind of thing is the doubling
> time. Unless your special purpose hardware doubles in speed as fast or
> faster than general purpose CPUs, then eventually it's going to be
> slow, then expensive, and fina
Hi,
That's not really the point here, I was talking about lowest end
hardware compared to high end CPU. If we compare with high end hardware,
then we're talking about factor >50 faster than software There are
chips out that can do >1Gbit 3-DES, given a 64bit/66Mhz PCI bus.
I'm just starting
Soren Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> I'm not claiming any specific numbers, just that the chip I'm using, the
> lowest end hi/fn 7951, is said to be faster than your typical highend
> >1Ghz CPU doing 3-DES.
[ ... ]
> I'm only talking about this specific case of doing computing intensive
I guess the kernel will block the process trying to write more data than
that can be accommodated. Or if you are using non-blocking I/O, it will
return an error.
-Zhihui
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Manas Bhatt wrote:
> hi all,
> pipes uses only direct blocks to store data. so
> depending on the
hi all,
pipes uses only direct blocks to store data. so
depending on the blocksize , a total data of
10*blocksize can be written in one go but what happens
if a writer process tries to write more 10*blocksize
of data in one go. Does the kernel overwrites the
data in pipe or not ? if yes, wh
Suppose I write a program that calls sbrk(). How can I trace into the
function sbrk()? In this particular case, I want to know whether
sbrk() calls the function in file lib/libstand/sbrk.c or sys/sbrk.S.
Sometimes it is nice to see what system call is eventually called as well.
I know dynamic lin
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:29:28AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > Is there a particular reason, other than
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:15:58PM -0400, Brian Somers wrote:
> Bear in mind though, starting with 0x7fff as an interface unit number
> will look pretty ugly when you ifconfig -a
The other idea I had as to define some sort of "first wildcard unit"
value to pass instead of 0 as the start of t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 06/24/2001 2:53:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > And btw, hardware beats software anytime. The fastest PC processor right
> > now is about the same speed as the slowest hardware.
>
> what are the numbers? Are you ac
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:10:38PM +0100, daniel lawrence scribbled:
> | This is probably a long shot, but I'll ask anyway. We have 3 HP9000/L1000
> | machines which we may be able to make available (serial console and network)
> | for some kind of BSD
"Eugene L. Vorokov" wrote:
> probably this question was asked here many times before,
> but I'm new to kernel mode hacks ... Is it somehow possible
> to access files from my kld module ? I have seen functions
> like printf(), MALLOC() for kernel mode, but nothing like
> open() ... using open() sys
> In the gif interface cloning code I used the resource management code
> like Brian did in the tun cloning code to manage unit numbers. When the
> user requests an arbitrary unit, they get the first one available, but
> I'm not convinced that's what we want because that has the potential to
> in
On 2001.06.27 10:00 Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
> : On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:10:48 +0100, John Toon wrote:
>
> >./setup: error in loading shared libraries:
> >/usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid.
>
> You somewhere have an LD_PRELOAD variable set for that library. This
> is a
>
Marc van Woerkom wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while porting the ogle dvd player I faced the
> problem of needing fast byte swap routines for
> 16, 32 and 64 bit words.
>
> After grepping through the -CURRENT sources
> I came up with at least three different
> assembler implementations.
The networking im
: On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:10:48 +0100, John Toon wrote:
>./setup: error in loading shared libraries:
>/usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid.
You somewhere have an LD_PRELOAD variable set for that library. This is a
"busy cursor" library and it is popular with Gnome.
A truss
On 2001.06.27 08:01 Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jun 27), John Toon said:
> > I'm experiencing Linux emulation issues on my FreeBSD-4.1 setup.
> > Whenever I attempt to run a Linux binary, they try to access my
> > FreeBSD library /usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0 - even for
> programs
Hi,
probably this question was asked here many times before, but I'm new
to kernel mode hacks ... Is it somehow possible to access files from
my kld module ? I have seen functions like printf(), MALLOC() for
kernel mode, but nothing like open() ... using open() syscall
directly seems impossible t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:10:38PM +0100, daniel lawrence scribbled:
| This is probably a long shot, but I'll ask anyway. We have 3 HP9000/L1000
| machines which we may be able to make available (serial console and network)
| for some kind of BSD porting project.
|
| I know it is probably off the
This is probably a long shot, but I'll ask anyway. We have 3 HP9000/L1000
machines which we may be able to make available (serial console and network)
for some kind of BSD porting project.
I know it is probably off the beaten track a little, but would there be any
interest in this, or are resourc
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:43:02PM -0400, David Petrou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi. On linux, I know that when compiling threaded code I need to
> > #define _REENTRANT. What's the right thing to do on FreeBSD? I've
> > searched around the FreeBSD
Hi,
I'm experiencing Linux emulation issues on my FreeBSD-4.1 setup.
Whenever I attempt to run a Linux binary, they try to access my FreeBSD
library /usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0 - even for programs that
apparently have *no* need of this library (Linux version or otherwise).
In particular, ne
Hi,
I'm experiencing Linux emulation issues on my FreeBSD-4.1 setup.
Whenever I attempt to run a Linux binary, they try to access my FreeBSD
library /usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0 - even for programs that
apparently have *no* need of this library (Linux version or otherwise).
In particular, ne
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:43:02PM -0400, David Petrou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi. On linux, I know that when compiling threaded code I need to
> #define _REENTRANT. What's the right thing to do on FreeBSD? I've
> searched around the FreeBSD pages and have come up empty. I googled
> aroun
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:29:28AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Is there a particular reason, other than the desire for more setgid
> > > programs, that ifmcsta
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Is there a particular reason, other than the desire for more setgid
> > programs, that ifmcstat(8) is setgid kmem? It seems that there's no
> > reason anyone but root
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Is there a particular reason, other than the desire for more setgid
> programs, that ifmcstat(8) is setgid kmem? It seems that there's no
> reason anyone but root would want to use it, anyway. OpenBSD and
> NetBSD alr
30 matches
Mail list logo
