On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:44:02AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> .) kqueue.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/thttpd-2.19+kq.patch
Kris
PGP signature
* Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010421 08:03] wrote:
> > > or so the numbers have lead me to beleive. Its still an annoying
> > > design, but has someone come up with real numbers to show that accept()
> > > hurding is a problem for waiters that do real work after accept() ?
> >
> > Accept her
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 08:01:20AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> > I do see both synchronous writes and asynchronous writes on my
> > filesystem (as reported by mount); what are these?
>
> The default mount is "nosync". synchronou
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> I do see both synchronous writes and asynchronous writes on my
> filesystem (as reported by mount); what are these?
The default mount is "nosync". synchronous metadata, asynchronous data.
Compare with the "async" and "sync" mount
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > Soft updates isn't an "async" or "sync" thing. It combines synchronous
> > and asynchronous transfers. If I'm not mistaken, all metadata is
> > synchronously written, and all data is asynchronously written.
>
> You're mistaken,
* Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010421 06:47] wrote:
> [apologies for missing the original post and replying to a reply..]
>
> > > - A round-robin token-passing scheme to determine which process gets
> > > to do the accept(). Turns out it's very bad to just have all the
> > > process
6 matches
Mail list logo
