In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian W.
Buchanan" writes:
: Do PCI PCMCIA adapters work in 4.3?
No.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> I'm curious about the other things though ... FreeBSD still seems
> to have the early 90's abstraction layer from Mach and the vnode
> cache doesn't seem to grow and shrink dynamically (which can be a
> big win for systems with lots of metadata activity).
>
> So while it
Hi,
I have gone through the tutorial composed be you on FreeBSD.org page.
I am developing a loadable module on FreeBSD which will act a network
pci card driver. The problem with the module is that, the probe/attach
routines are not getting called. I have filled a driver_t, devclass_t
and
used t
Write-Ahead File System (WAFS) v1.0 Release Notice.
The WAFS source code is now available for download at
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~stein/wafs/
WAFS is a simple file system designed to act as a logging
service for kernel subsystems. Reads and writes are keyed
by log-sequence number (LSN). Al
It's randomness that will kill performance. You know the old saying
about caches: They only work if you get cache hits, otherwise
they only slow things down.
-Matt
:Which is ok if there isn't too much activity with these data
:structures
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> :I'm curious about the other things though ... FreeBSD still seems
> :to have the early 90's abstraction layer from Mach and the vnode
> :cache doesn't seem to grow and shrink dynamically (which can be a
> :big win for systems with lots of metadata activi
thanks alot for your help alfred much appreciated.
you were right all lockf's turned to accepts right after
i made that change.thanks again.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:16 -0700
> From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dan Phoenix
:In the balancing part, definately. FreeBSD seems to be the only
:system that has the balancing right. I'm planning on integrating
:some of the balancing tactics into Linux for the 2.5 kernel, but
:I'm not sure how to integrate the inode and dentry cache into the
:balancing scheme ...
:I'm curio
* Eric Lee Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 15:38] wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, HyunSeog Ryu wrote:
> > . Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
> > Technical Case Study
> >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
>
> They forgot to do
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, HyunSeog Ryu wrote:
> . Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
> Technical Case Study
>http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
They forgot to document reason #0 for migration to Windows 2000: Because
running FreeBSD
At a glance the following config should work. If apache is not in
'accept' then you've done something wrong.
* Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 15:01] wrote:
>
>
> Ok let's take this for example
>
> Listen 172.16.0.26:80
> Listen 172.16.6.2:80
>
> NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80
> Nam
Ok let's take this for example
Listen 172.16.0.26:80
Listen 172.16.6.2:80
NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80
NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2:80
.6.2 is real ip for load balancer.
.0.x is for internal use
so let;s rewrite.
Bind *
Port 80
NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26
NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2
t
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
> :I heard NetBSD has implemented a FreeBSD like VM, it also implemented
> :a VM balance in recent verion of NetBSD. some parameters like TEXT,
> :DATA and anonymous memory space can be tuned. is there anyone doing
> :such work on FreeBSD or has FreeBSD alr
I know right now that Theo Schlossnagle (from mod_backhand
fame), is working on a bi-directional accept filter for keep alives
that will allow Apache to pass the connection back to the kernel so
that the apache child can serve a different request.
scenario:
1) request comes in
2)
* Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 13:02] wrote:
>
>
> show alot of that in top
> occasioanallythink that could be from nfs timeouts
> or just waiting on mysql connections to come back?
>
> what are they generally from?
They're using a lockfile around the select() call on the accept
show alot of that in top
occasioanallythink that could be from nfs timeouts
or just waiting on mysql connections to come back?
what are they generally from?
--
Dan
+--+
| BRAVENET WEB SERVICES |
|
* Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 11:05] wrote:
> People are constantly asking me about the performance of gigabit ethernet
> cards with FreeBSD. I'm constantly wishing they would all go to hell --
> directly to hell, without passing "GO" or collecting $200 -- but their
> persistence has led
>
> FreeBSD implements a very sophisticated VM balancing algorithm. Nobody's
> complaining about it so I don't think we need to really change it. Most
> of the other UNIXes, including Linux, are actually playing catch-up to
> FreeBSD's VM design.
>
I remember hearing/viewing a
:I heard NetBSD has implemented a FreeBSD like VM, it also implemented
:a VM balance in recent verion of NetBSD. some parameters like TEXT,
:DATA and anonymous memory space can be tuned. is there anyone doing
:such work on FreeBSD or has FreeBSD already implemented it?
:
:--
:David Xu
FreeB
People are constantly asking me about the performance of gigabit ethernet
cards with FreeBSD. I'm constantly wishing they would all go to hell --
directly to hell, without passing "GO" or collecting $200 -- but their
persistence has led me to ask a few questions of my own. One thing everyone
notic
>From the top level page I read hotmail handles 550,000 change
requests a day. Later in the article they say they have a
5000 server farm. That translates to 110 change requests a
day on average per server. If the peak rate is 10 times the
average, that is still only about 1100 requests/server/
Hi everyone. I'd like to report a problem we've been having with the
Aironet driver
on two of our machines. One machine is running FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE,
and the other is a very recent upgrade to 4.3-RC1. They both have
Aironet PCI4800 cards and are connected directly to antennas (one on our
ro
In the last episode (Apr 10), Paul Halliday said:
> Taken from:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
>
> "FreeBSD, a UNIX-like system similar to the Linux operating system,
> was used to run the front-end Web servers that handled login,
> Microsoft Outlook_ Express, an
Actually, the most fascinating part of the article for me was footnote 2:
F2 - There obviously are multi-tasking/multi-process solutions that
Hotmail could have leveraged under FreeBSD. However, they would
require making application modifications and rework to implement. So,
this was
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 09:13:15PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
> > So I am wondering, why the unices block mounting an already mounted
> > partition read only again.
>
> Have you considered using ACLs perhaps? Sure it's not in -STABLE, but
> it's a thou
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Attila Nagy wrote:
> With the appearing of the jail() in 4.0 I think it would be very good to
> have the functionality of mounting already mounted (RW) filesystems read
> only to another directory.
Many people agree with you -- this is one reason why the fixing of nullfs
in
I didn't know you were allowed to say "warez" on hackers@
/joseph
--
Joseph Mallett Security Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newgold.net
irc.newgold.net/#xMach xMach Core Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xMach.org
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Paul Halliday wrote:
> Take
Taken from:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
"FreeBSD, a UNIX-like system similar to the Linux operating system, was
used to run the front-end Web servers that
handled login, Microsoft Outlook® Express, and Web-based content
delivery tasks"
Is it just me or
Hi, folks
Today I got email from Microsoft regarding hotmail migration.
. Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
Technical Case Study
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
If you have free time, enjoy M$'s wonderful marketing power.
I heard NetBSD has implemented a FreeBSD like VM, it also implemented
a VM balance in recent verion of NetBSD. some parameters like TEXT,
DATA and anonymous memory space can be tuned. is there anyone doing
such work on FreeBSD or has FreeBSD already implemented it?
--
David Xu
To Unsubscribe
Andrew Hesford wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Jon Molin wrote:
> > The -I option gives the same output:
> > jmo# fdisk -I ad3
> > *** Working on device /dev/ad3 ***
> > fdisk: invalid fdisk partition table found
> > jmo# disklabel -B -w -r ad3s1 auto
> > disklabel: /
31 matches
Mail list logo
