On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
AP>* Peter Seebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 23:49] wrote:
AP>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Todd Whitesel writes:
AP>> >Just put a 1-element array at the end of your header struct, and account for
AP>> >it when you work out how much extra space t
* Peter Seebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 23:49] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Todd Whitesel writes:
> >Just put a 1-element array at the end of your header struct, and account for
> >it when you work out how much extra space to allocate. C memory layout rules
> >guarantee that this u
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Todd Whitesel writes:
>Just put a 1-element array at the end of your header struct, and account for
>it when you work out how much extra space to allocate. C memory layout rules
>guarantee that this usage will have the desired effect.
Nope, not portable. The imple
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:40:05PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> 3com never has,
Uh, how do you think Bill Paul wrote the xl driver?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>> >Can someone pls tell me if it is possible to define an array of size 0.
>>
>> Not in C.
>
>GCC and most other compilers support it.
>I do it all the time (see all the various netgraph structures) however it must
>be the LAST item in the structure. It gives the address of the first byte
>AF
Hi!
I previously sent this message to the questions list but I didn't
receive an answer. That is why I'm now trying this list.
I'm gathering some performance data of some 4.1.1 kernel routines by
means of rtsc() calls. For storing the performance data, I have defined
an array of u_int64_t. For re
It seems BSD Blood wrote:
> Hello.
>I'm using FreeBSD 4.1. My kernel contains the ata driver for the IDE
> controllers. I understand that the ata driver has replaced the wd driver. My
> question is:-
>
> 1. Are there any / Do I need to use certain flags to enable LBA, DMA, etc.
> features
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On 30-Mar-2001 Coleman Kane wrote:
> There is an ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA or something to that effect in the kernel config
> you must set. Read /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT for more info. You may also man
> ata.
That only affects ATAPI devices (ie not hard drives).
You can enable write caching and ta
Some are legacy drivers that need space configured in the kernel for them.
Others are newer PCI devices that can auto-attach. This stuff is being
phased-out in -current.
BSD Blood had the audacity to say:
>
> Hello.
>While configuring my kernel configuration file, I notice that certain
> en
There is an ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA or something to that effect in the kernel config
you must set. Read /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT for more info. You may also man
ata.
BSD Blood had the audacity to say:
>
> Hello.
>I'm using FreeBSD 4.1. My kernel contains the ata driver for the IDE
> controllers
At 07:20 PM 03/29/2001, Soren Kristensen wrote:
>Sorry everybody, I have to express my opinion now.
>
>Dennis, it seems like that you keep repeating yourself here
>And you keep being wrong. As a hardware designer myself, I can
>assure you that there is no connection between hardware quality
>
Hello.
While configuring my kernel configuration file, I notice that certain
entries have numbers after the driver and some don't. For example: -
device psm0
device da
My questions are:-
1. What's the number behind the driver?
2. Why for some entries there are no numbers?
Hello.
I'm using FreeBSD 4.1. My kernel contains the ata driver for the IDE
controllers. I understand that the ata driver has replaced the wd driver. My
question is:-
1. Are there any / Do I need to use certain flags to enable LBA, DMA, etc.
features like for the wd driver? Or is this done
Sorry everybody, I have to express my opinion now.
Dennis, it seems like that you keep repeating yourself here
And you keep being wrong. As a hardware designer myself, I can
assure you that there is no connection between hardware quality
and level of documentation.
And having fought with In
At 11:01 AM 03/29/2001, you wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote:
>
> > At 04:22 PM 03/28/2001, Chistopher S. Weimann wrote:
> > >On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:33:21PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Your logic is backwards. You think that rewarding mediocre
> companies will
> > > > scare
On 29-Mar-01 John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 29-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> I can't seem to get a crashdump, is there a way to take a
>> ddb crash address: "Stopped at lf_setlock+0x52"
>> and boot later and see what line of code that's on?
>
> l *lf_setlock+0x52
>
> For example, on one of m
On 29-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I can't seem to get a crashdump, is there a way to take a
> ddb crash address: "Stopped at lf_setlock+0x52"
> and boot later and see what line of code that's on?
l *lf_setlock+0x52
For example, on one of my SMP test boxes:
> gdb -k /sys/compile/MUTEX/ke
god,
thas what i am trying to say.../dev/ad0 or /dev/wd0 whatever is not working
whereas /dev/hda in Linux is workinf perfectly...
also hexdump /dev/hda ( in Linux) and hexdump /dev/ad0 (or /dev/wd0) gave me the
same results
now can anyone answer that
thanks
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote:
> it doesnt "hurt" at all. Dealing with bitter losers is part of the public
> experience :-)
>
> Thanks for the tip. i'll forward it to the customer who needs it and let
> him do the work. I've got some more flames to deflect :-)
Dennis, comments like this are
Sorry, away for a couple of days...but yes, I am firewalled (ipfw, I beleive
I'm running 4.2 current, although kernel says 4.3 beta...I cvsup-ed and this
is a by product). fxp0 is external if, tun0 is pppoe if pointed at fxp0 and
fxp1 is internal. I have no problem scanning to internal addrs, bu
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Murray Stokely wrote:
> The NetBSD guys have STLport in 'pkgsrc' to facilitate the
> progress they've made with OpenOffice. I haven't looked at the
> changes they made but as soon as I get NetBSD on that U1 I'll take
> a look at it.
Open Source Tripwire is now ported to F
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:56:21PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> Anyway, I just had a quick look, and I think that your basic problem is
> that MAKEDEV uses the wrong encoding for devices above 255. This is
> fixed in -CURRENT, and if you bring back the unit2minor changes from
> there to -STABLE
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't seem to get a crashdump, is there a way to take a
> ddb crash address: "Stopped at lf_setlock+0x52"
> and boot later and see what line of code that's on?
Assuming you have a corresponding kernel with debuggin
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote:
> At 04:22 PM 03/28/2001, Chistopher S. Weimann wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:33:21PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> > >
> > > Your logic is backwards. You think that rewarding mediocre companies will
> > > scare good companies into wanting a piece of the pie. Th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
}
}--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
}Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
}Content-Disposition: inline
}Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
}
}On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:29:55PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
}
}> }Please post the output of env(1) when run as
Benny Prijono wrote:
> Benny Prijono wrote:
> >
> > As far as I notice (I only briefly browse the web version though), the
> > difference between the printed and the online version is, the printed
> > version has nice summary table of conformance level test results,
>
> oops...
> second browse to
Gunnar Olsson wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is the following possible to do with the vtund?!
>
> I have one host running FreeBSD 4.2. On that host
> I have one "real" ethernet board, rl0. I would like to create
> several tap interfaces (managed to do). All packets directed
> to the tap interfaces I want to b
Benny Prijono wrote:
>
> As far as I notice (I only briefly browse the web version though), the
> difference between the printed and the online version is, the printed
> version has nice summary table of conformance level test results,
oops...
second browse to the URL reveals that the results s
Arjan Knepper wrote:
>
> Joachim Strömbergson wrote:
>
> > http://www.cuj.com/roundup/a.htm
> >
> > Fast-browsing it seems that conformance visavi STL is not the main focus
> > of this article. It doeas talk about a STL roundup though.
>
> Exactly,
> There isn't a list or table showing the part
Hi,
Is the following possible to do with the vtund?!
I have one host running FreeBSD 4.2. On that host
I have one "real" ethernet board, rl0. I would like to create
several tap interfaces (managed to do). All packets directed
to the tap interfaces I want to be tunneled through the rl0
interfaces
Joachim Strömbergson wrote:
> http://www.cuj.com/roundup/a.htm
>
> Fast-browsing it seems that conformance visavi STL is not the main focus
> of this article. It doeas talk about a STL roundup though.
Exactly,
There isn't a list or table showing the particular issues with the various
STL (compil
32 matches
Mail list logo
