I messed around with this about a year ago, and now I'm messing around with
it again.
In a nutshell, I can NOT figure out how to get iic with lpbb working. I
have tried all sorts of combinations of config file parameters from LINT,
man pages, etc.
My current config file has something like:
Hi
I am trying to convert my PCI device driver into a KLD.
So far I have done the following:
1. Built the kernel without the static linked device driver.
2. Added entries to Makefiles in /sys/modules and /sys/modules/xxx.
3. Did "make all install" in /sys/modules directory.
4. Tried loading the
Let me clarify that I don't really mean to be negative about these efforts- I
just don't want them to distract us from other issues of great importance for
FreeBSD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> > The differences are still there, and it's usually soo tough to get
> > companies to provide drivers for FreeBSD. Yeah IBM GPL'd some
> > winmodems, no one has mentioned a FreeBSD port...
> >
> > Although the issue might be political, UDI might be the way to finally
> >
Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:04:45AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > The findchip thing would be nice..
>
> Will do then.
>
> > one way is to simply boot with -v and look at the PNP IDs that the BIOS
> > returns.
> > (what I did)
>
> Actually I have done that, to
> The differences are still there, and it's usually soo tough to get
> companies to provide drivers for FreeBSD. Yeah IBM GPL'd some
> winmodems, no one has mentioned a FreeBSD port...
>
> Although the issue might be political, UDI might be the way to finally
> get over the "designed only for
The differences are still there, and it's usually soo tough to get
companies to provide drivers for FreeBSD. Yeah IBM GPL'd some
winmodems, no one has mentioned a FreeBSD port...
Although the issue might be political, UDI might be the way to finally
get over the "designed only for windows ..and s
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that at the time this was a huge issue there were a much larger
> > number of machines and pieces of h/w and radically different OS's (or flavors
> > within Unix even) to support. Such a wide set of differenc
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> The problem is that at the time this was a huge issue there were a much larger
> number of machines and pieces of h/w and radically different OS's (or flavors
> within Unix even) to support. Such a wide set of differences is not really
> there any more, hence the cost of
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:04:45AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
[snip]
> there's a few of us working on IrDA
>
> yes we CAN use the ng_tty node for the low speed SIR
> implimentation.(And we plan on doing so for systems that
> only have the tty interface. Most laptops these days have
> a mor
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Gérard Roudier wrote:
> Being smart with kernel interface is important for drivers to be fast and
> reliable. Puting some stinky layer between native kernel interfaces and
> drivers looks horrible to me.
Fast and reliable are both covered.
For example, the specification (though not the current
>
> Being smart with kernel interface is important for drivers to be fast and
> reliable. Puting some stinky layer between native kernel interfaces and
> drivers looks horrible to me.
>
> Why isn't UDI proposed as a native kernel interface, instead?
> Note that last time I read the specs, I have
Being smart with kernel interface is important for drivers to be fast and
reliable. Puting some stinky layer between native kernel interfaces and
drivers looks horrible to me.
Why isn't UDI proposed as a native kernel interface, instead?
Note that last time I read the specs, I haven't been this
I'd mentioned a few times on this list that I had tinkered with a port
of UDI, the Uniform Driver Interface, to a FreeBSD environment while
waiting for our lawyers to get their acts together[1]. Well, I got the
final clearance and the code was released today at:
http://projectudi.sourcef
David:
I believe that links on CD-ROM are handled using RockRidge extensions,
which basically has plain text files named "00_TRANS.TBL" in each
directory which contains links to other files on the CD. I don't know
all the details and specifics, but you should probably consult your CD
recording so
Mustafa N. Deeb wrote:
> I'm thinking of testing qmail, and qmail-POP3 using MYSQL
> I need some openions, from people who used it..
This is /not/ the right place for this question. People who
switch to qmail are usually happy they did; it's fast and
reliable and easy to configure. Some people
I'm trying to back up some freebsd systems on cdrom. My intention is to
have one which people can look at specific file on, or pax/tar/dump over
on top of a live, minimally installed OS.
/stand has 31 file of considerable size: on a standard system they're all
hard links to the same file. All h
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:04:45AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> The findchip thing would be nice..
Will do then.
> one way is to simply boot with -v and look at the PNP IDs that the BIOS
> returns.
> (what I did)
Actually I have done that, too. From the many PnP devices that the
system re
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Panagiotis Astithas writes:
: implement the lower protocol layer on top of ng_tty, essentially
: doing something like IrDA-over-serial? If that was possible I
: guess we don't have to implement any drivers at all, and we
: could concentrate on the higher layers of th
hi,
I'm thinking of testing qmail, and qmail-POP3 using
MYSQL
I need some openions, from people who used
it..
Cheers
Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am one of those who would like to see IrDA support in FreeBSD,
> and for that matter I am prepared to offer some work. I have
> downloaded the relative specifications and I have been looking
> at the Linux-IrDA stuff. I am about to embark on an effo
Hi folks,
I am one of those who would like to see IrDA support in FreeBSD,
and for that matter I am prepared to offer some work. I have
downloaded the relative specifications and I have been looking
at the Linux-IrDA stuff. I am about to embark on an effort to
port the irda-utils-0.9.13 from lin
gdb(1) does this definitely. truss(1) gdb for the first and start
thinking.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, milunovic wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Huh thanks those who helped me with some ptrace() examples for Linux.
> But I cann't still figure how to trace programm execution under F
Title: own memory size of process (exclude memory shared from parent)
Dear hackers!
Does anybody knows how to calculate own memory size of process.
Ps or top shows resident/total size of process, but both these
values include memory pages shared from parent.
I want know how much memory us
milunovic wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Huh thanks those who helped me with some ptrace() examples for Linux.
> But I cann't still figure how to trace programm execution under FreeBSD...
> please can anybody help me or give me some source example to see:o)
> Thank you
man -k
26 matches
Mail list logo
