On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, "SteveB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SteveB> Sorry for such a basic question, but I have been looking and can't
SteveB> find the answer. Is FreeBSD as microkernel or monolithic kernel like
SteveB> Linux? Can someone point me to the answer/
It's a monolithic kernel, like Li
On 16-Dec-00 SteveB wrote:
>
> Sorry for such a basic question, but I have been looking and can't
> find the answer. Is FreeBSD as microkernel or monolithic kernel like
> Linux? Can someone point me to the answer/
Well, it's a monolithic kernel with a built in run-time linker that allows you
Sorry for such a basic question, but I have been looking and can't
find the answer. Is FreeBSD as microkernel or monolithic kernel like
Linux? Can someone point me to the answer/
TIA
Steve B.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of t
At 11:43 AM 12/15/2000, you wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 12:13:16PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> >
> > It seems that cp fails badly when used on a system booted by a boot floppy
> > (such as the install floppy). cpio seems to work ok.
> >
> > What is the reason for this?
>
>What's the failure mode?
On 2000-12-14, "Fulvio Risso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Buffer sizes
> We did not make any test about creating 1MB buffers. However our
> architecture does not have the problem that "large buffer" = "large
> time used to transfer this buffer to user level" because we are able to
[snip]
> Conte
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:42:45 +0100 (CET)
> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mb> I'd like to import the NetBSD RPC-Interface, based on Sun's TI-RPC code.
Oh, it's great! I heared TI-RPC is required to support IPv6 for NFS.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:50:20PM +, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios
scribbled:
| i am planning a very big email server, currently i am planning for about
| 8*2^16 users.
[snip]
| What you wizard have to say about my approach?
Why would you not want to have a distributed server in th
Hi there,
I was wondering why VESA_800x600 refreshes to 80x25 and figured out,
that
size[0] = 80; /* columns */
size[1] = 25; /* rows */
for mode SW_VESA_800x600 (line 319 of src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol.c).
A screen resolution of 800x600 would make
size[0] = 100; /* columns */
size[1] = 37;
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:36:57PM +0100, Koster, K.J. scribbled:
| > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-09-013-20-NW-GN-KN
| > Device drivers in Perl. What a spectacularly bad idea. ;^)
| That's what people used to say about writing kernels in C.
There is a difference between (
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 12:13:16PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
>
> It seems that cp fails badly when used on a system booted by a boot floppy
> (such as the install floppy). cpio seems to work ok.
>
> What is the reason for this?
What's the failure mode?
--
Ben
220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Post
* Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001215 01:39] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to import the NetBSD RPC-Interface, based on Sun's TI-RPC code.
>
> This will made available the TI-RPC features and generated code with
> rpcgen will compile then without problems. The code remains backword
> compat
>
> > A simple way to keep the kernel simple:
> >
> http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-09-013-20-NW-GN-KN
>
> Device drivers in Perl. What a spectacularly bad idea. ;^)
>
That's what people used to say about writing kernels in C.
Kees Jan
I've had FreeBSD 4.1 running on a Dual Celeron system for some time now with a
MS USB .. No probs.
Just got a new system in the last week, and am running FreeBSD 4.2
It's on a MSI 694D-Pro Motherboard, and has had one CPU in it for the last
week, the USB mouse ran fine
Got the second CPU
subscribe freebsd-hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I forgot a link ...
http://www.as400.ibm.com/developer/tirpc/
Cheers:
Martin
Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider
Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland
Phone: +41 79 370 26 05, Fax: +41 61 8
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:57:43AM +, Jamie Heckford wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, you wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Konrad Heuer wrote:
> > > For a heavily loaded printer server (as mine is) this seems not be a good
> > > idea ... but maybe there's a good reason to to t
hi all,
I can't get the pxe/dhcp to work when it's 100Mbit Ethernet, it works
fine when it's 10Mbit. Actually a newer Intel MB just succeeded, but 99%
of the pxe enabled cards fail at 100Mbit. from sniffing the net the broadcast
dhcp request does not make it. it does not help to set the sw
> You could also manually add them to /etc/hosts - but this will be a bit tediou
> when you have a lot of machines. Maybe list IP addresses in /etc/hosts.lpd
> instead of hostnames? This could cause alot of reverse lookups though.
Another, slightly strange, way to do it would be to create a set o
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, you wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Konrad Heuer wrote:
> > For a heavily loaded printer server (as mine is) this seems not be a good
> > idea ... but maybe there's a good reason to to this?
>
> I presume this is so that you can list machine aliases in the
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Konrad Heuer wrote:
> For a heavily loaded printer server (as mine is) this seems not be a good
> idea ... but maybe there's a good reason to to this?
I presume this is so that you can list machine aliases in the
hosts.lpd file, and to avoid issues with m
While solving some special remote printing problems I saw (4.2-STABLE)
that lpd verifies printer access from a remote host by a lot of name
resolution requests (my /etc/hosts.lpd has more than 300 entries).
When verifying a host lpd scans hosts.lpd from the first line to the first
matching line
Hi,
I'd like to import the NetBSD RPC-Interface, based on Sun's TI-RPC code.
This will made available the TI-RPC features and generated code with
rpcgen will compile then without problems. The code remains backword
compatible, there ar no changes needed in the codebase (therefore some
are reco
22 matches
Mail list logo
