Hi
Thanks for your reply. I have two other questions
regarding this matter.
Would it be possible to extend the kernel stack?
The reason is that some of the crypto and hashing
algorithms use relatively large contexts which for
performance reasons are currently allocated on the
stack.
If this is
> Hi,
>
> The reason I am doing this, is precisely because I need to virtualize accesses
> from several processes to _one_ _predefined_ device. I have no control over that
> device name from the client process point of view, so I can not have multiple
> devices. I pretty much need to be able to
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:56:21PM +0100, Konrad Heuer wrote:
> After patching and installing, tcpdump can't be used anymore since it puts
> very heavy load onto the network via xl0 and AppleTalk broadcast messages
> (one message each 0.2 ms). Sorry, in the moment I don't know more details
> ...
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:47:40PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>>
>> The C language is crufty. In the absense of a prototype, "short" is
>> promoted to "int". You wanted to be warned about that; you got it!
>
> short going to int would be a de
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> of a fixed point argument except when the same as the default
> promotion.
> The C language is crufty. In the absense of a prototype, "short" is
> promoted to "int". You wanted to be warned about that; you got it!
short going
Max Khon wrote:
>
> hi, there!
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> > } > what is FD 4?
> > }
> > } I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
> >
> > It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
> > dependent on which shell you use.
>
> exactly. this does n
"Albert D. Cahalan" writes:
> The C language is crufty. In the absense of a prototype, "short" is
> promoted to "int". You wanted to be warned about that; you got it!
>
> To avoid the warning, avoid passing anything but "int" and "double".
> Maybe "long" is OK too, I forget.
I'm not sure which
> The reason I am doing this, is precisely because I need to virtualize
> accesses from several processes to _one_ _predefined_ device. I have no
> control over that device name from the client process point of view, so I
> can not have multiple devices. I pretty much need to be able to lie to
Hi,
The reason I am doing this, is precisely because I need to virtualize accesses
from several processes to _one_ _predefined_ device. I have no control over that
device name from the client process point of view, so I can not have multiple
devices. I pretty much need to be able to lie to the
Peter Pentchev writes:
> As you can see, I'm passing a short i as a first arg, a short f
> as second, and a short b as third; and yet, gcc with BDECFLAGS
> complains about ALL the arguments!
Yes, no kidding. That's what you asked gcc to do.
`-Wconversion'
Warn if a prototype caus
> when a process closes the device, I do not get a "close" call for each
> process closing the device. I instead get a close only on the last
> process closing the device.
the reason for this is that you might have a process fork() after
it has opened the device, and you do not want to get to the
Hello everybody,
I am writing a pseudo-device driver (as a kernel module) that needs to
be opened in write mode by several processes. The problem I am having is
that I do get all the "open" calls when a process opens the device, and
I am able to process data written, etc. on a per-process basis;
Nathan Boeger wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is the wrong list !!
>
> Anyway I have a Digi / Xem eisa adapter on 4.1-RELEASE. I have made the
> kernel and it see's the card. I have also remade the /dev/ttyD* entries.
>
> Problem, when I try to access any of the ports I get :
>
> cu: open (/dev/ttyD0
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001107 15:33] wrote:
>
> On 07-Nov-00 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001107 14:58] wrote:
> >> I have a patch here that I'd like to get into LINT for 4.2,
> >> it _finally_ documents the sysV IPC tunables.
> >>
> >> I'll al
On 07-Nov-00 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001107 14:58] wrote:
>> I have a patch here that I'd like to get into LINT for 4.2,
>> it _finally_ documents the sysV IPC tunables.
>>
>> I'll also be applying this patch to NOTES for -current.
>
> Bah, someone beat
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001107 14:58] wrote:
> I have a patch here that I'd like to get into LINT for 4.2,
> it _finally_ documents the sysV IPC tunables.
>
> I'll also be applying this patch to NOTES for -current.
Bah, someone beat me for -current, but I like my patch better
bec
I have a patch here that I'd like to get into LINT for 4.2,
it _finally_ documents the sysV IPC tunables.
I'll also be applying this patch to NOTES for -current.
Index: LINT
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/conf/Attic/LINT,v
re
hi everyone,
i want to install serveral intel isp1100 servers with serial console attached.
the problem is that is want install them automatically without any user
interaction. but sysinstall asks me for the terminal type on serial
console.
everything else work real fine (pxe boot, package i
In the last episode (Nov 07), Dag-Erling Smorgrav said:
> Graham Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am trying to write a screen saver module that, when it kicks in,
> > will switch to the first console, and then, if a key is pressed,
> > will switch back to the one that was previously activ
:Hi
:
:Please excuse any silly questions, but I am stuck with
:a problem that I can't find the answer for.
:
:I wrote a KLD module that performs encryption on
:network packets in the kernel. Packets are intercepted
:for encryption on a ethernet level (in ether_input()
:and ether_output_frame() re
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> When I installed SO it didn't spitt out any complaints about the checksum.
>
> Did you install the Linux Emulator from /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base ?
> You need it since the SO port uses the Linux version.
Yes, and linux-netscape and wordperfect both install and
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:01:21AM +0100, Stefan Aeschbacher wrote:
> cc: Internal compiler error: program ld got fatal signal 11
>
> this error happens during each compilation but it does not
> happen at the same location in the source code each run.
> furthermore, some daemons tend to segfaul
Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Nov 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > # load -t md /filesystemfile
> > Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
> Actually, it's md_image or mfs_root (see /sys/dev/md/md.c:446). Both of
> these ar
Hello Harti,
> > > is there somebody working to make if_tap devfs-ready? Or I'm doing
> > > something wrong?
> >
> > [SNIP]
> > it seems to me that it did not get commited. i will look into it again
> > today and re-send patch to the list.
>
> Great! It works. (Minus a spelling error: the parame
Graham Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to write a screen saver module that, when it kicks in, will
> switch to the first console, and then, if a key is pressed, will switch
> back to the one that was previously active. The idea is that the first
> console has something useful ru
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > In my experience, the problem is not only with umask(2) - GCC *is*
> > a bit stubborn about -Wconversion; I wonder if this is really a GCC bug :(
> >
> > I'm having the same problems
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> In my experience, the problem is not only with umask(2) - GCC *is*
> a bit stubborn about -Wconversion; I wonder if this is really a GCC bug :(
>
> I'm having the same problems with many other functions when passing
> integer constants - even if I expl
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:30:05PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> > discovered the following funny thing about -Wconversion and umask(2),
>
> I spent quite a while trying to silence that warning in one of my programs
> the otherday but I dec
Hello, All! How are you?
One my program use alarm() to interrupt some blocking system calls.
I use alarm(1) (one second). Everything works Ok, except cases, when
ntpdate shift time more than 1 second forward. If time is shifted
when alarm are set already, but not generated yet, SIGALARM d
On 7 Nov 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > # load -t md /filesystemfile
>
> Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
Actually, it's md_image or mfs_root (see /sys/dev/md/md.c:446). Both of
these are mentioned in md(4).
Andrzej Bialecki
// <[EMAIL
void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been using Solaris a lot lately, and I've noticed that in e.g.
> top's output, it has a distinct CPU state called "iowait", which seems
> to be a pretty good indicator of how I/O-bound a system is. Is there
> any reason that FreeBSD doesn't have such a stat
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # load -t md /filesystemfile
Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi!
> | a H/A Failover system that happens to work with BSD. I
> would like to
> | contribute
> | this to the FreeBSD project or at a minimum make it
> available to those who
> | What it includes is:
> | - Multi-path heartbeat based node failure detection.
>
> How do you determine that
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:24:19PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > what is FD 4?
> >
> > I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
>
> yes. I am running sample program under FreeBSD 4.2-BETA (31 Oct 2000)
As was already mentione
hi, there!
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote:
> } > what is FD 4?
> }
> } I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
>
> It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
> dependent on which shell you use.
exactly. this does not happen if I run this program from tcsh
I'm having trouble mounting an MD as a root filesystem from 5.0.
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong please?
/boot/loader:
# load /kernel
# load -t md /filesystemfile
# boot
PROBES,etc.
Manual root filesystem specification:
: Mount using filesystem
etc...
Yes, I do have MD_ROOT compi
hi, there!
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > what is FD 4?
>
> I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
yes. I am running sample program under FreeBSD 4.2-BETA (31 Oct 2000)
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the b
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:41:19PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote:
>
> > what is FD 4?
>
> I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
Me neither..
RELENG_4 here, but daemon() seems to be exactly the same across (supported)
releases. All fd's I
On Nov 7, 11:41pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
} Subject: Re: daemon()
}
}
} On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote:
}
} > what is FD 4?
}
} I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
It might be something that the shell forgets to close, so it will be
dependent on which shell you use.
To Unsu
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote:
> what is FD 4?
I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen?
Andrew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> discovered the following funny thing about -Wconversion and umask(2),
I spent quite a while trying to silence that warning in one of my programs
the otherday but I decided it was probably harmless and left it.
> and vice versa, and conve
Hi
Please excuse any silly questions, but I am stuck with
a problem that I can't find the answer for.
I wrote a KLD module that performs encryption on
network packets in the kernel. Packets are intercepted
for encryption on a ethernet level (in ether_input()
and ether_output_frame() respectivel
This morning I applied the tcpdump v1.1 patch for 4.x-R on a 4.1-R system
with following configuration:
ti0 Gigabit-LinkIPv4 interface
xl0 Fast Ethernet AppleTalk interface
options NETATALK is included in the kernel config since the host uses the
netatalk package exports the home
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
Hi Maksim,
> > is there somebody working to make if_tap devfs-ready? Or I'm doing
> > something wrong?
>
> [SNIP]
> it seems to me that it did not get commited. i will look into it again
> today and re-send patch to the list.
Great! It works. (Minus
hi, there!
--- cut here ---
#include
#include
main()
{
if (daemon(1, 1) < 0) {
perror("daemon");
}
for (;;)
sleep(1);
}
--- cut here ---
lark:~$ps ax | grep foo3
26102 ?? Ss 0:00.00 ./foo3
26104 p8 S+ 0:00.01 grep foo3
lark
hi,
Some more WLP (wee-little-problem :-)
1- not setting a gateway in dhcp panics the kernel. I've been down this road
road before, but can't remember the fix - yet :-(.
2- somewhere - and it's not bootp.c - there must be a htonl ntohl problem.
example:
client-ip: 132
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:17:34PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> In my experience, the problem is not only with umask(2) - GCC *is*
> a bit stubborn about -Wconversion; I wonder if this is really a GCC bug :(
>
> I'm having the same problems with many other functions when passing
> integer const
In my experience, the problem is not only with umask(2) - GCC *is*
a bit stubborn about -Wconversion; I wonder if this is really a GCC bug :(
I'm having the same problems with many other functions when passing
integer constants - even if I explicitly cast them to a long or unsigned
long or plain
While trying to compile libskey with various warnings enabled, I
discovered the following funny thing about -Wconversion and umask(2),
which caused libskey to fail to compile, because it compiles by default
with -Werror which makes every warning fatal.
I found that the warning is caused when a pr
Hi
I have a machine which behaves very weird. It runs 4.0-stable built
in June. Recently i made a cvsupdate followed by a buildworld.
Both worked. Due to lack of time (and access to the machine for
installing in single user mode), I did not install anything.
Today I tried to compile something and
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:15:14AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way to make mergemaster revert to its old behavior - only
> > comparing $FreeBSD tags on files which have those?
>
> Of course there is a way, the question is how likely it is to happen
Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> Is there a way to make mergemaster revert to its old behavior - only
> comparing $FreeBSD tags on files which have those?
Of course there is a way, the question is how likely it is to happen.
:) You've stated the solution, just take the local tags out for now.
52 matches
Mail list logo
