Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>For normal users, ls -a lists all files, not counting . and .., but
>for root it does list all files.
No, it always lists all files.
>ls -A lists all files for normal users, but omits . and .. for root.
No, it always lists all files except for "." and "
Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > > I wrote a little line program to do a revoke(), it was basically
> > >
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { revoke(argv[1]); }
> > >
> > > Now this doesn't kill a darn thing. And you should be aware of it! But it
> > > does forcibly "close" any open fd's pointing at
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Stefan Aeschbacher wrote:
> I am running 4.1-stable updated ca 22.10.00.
> I set up a jail, started it but I have no network at all.
> I made an alias for the used IP address, I ran /etc/rc
> with the following output:
How are you starting the jail? I use this in my boot s
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 11:03:49PM +0100, Robert Eckardt wrote:
> However, while /dev/dsp works fine for 8bit /dev/dspW doesn't work for
> 16bit at all. 16bit mode gives some cracks and beeps, nothing more, as can
> be seen from the following hexdumps:
16-bit recording on the SB16 is known to be
Hi,
There are a lot of information about FreeBSD in the Handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/handbook), But if you want to have a deep look
into the kernel (BSD in general) you may buy this book:
The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating System
ISBN 0-201-54979-4 , 580 pages
B
>
> Well, for one thing, 99% of the PC architecture assumes that the first
> track is reserved for the MBR so to speak, so putting boot1 in the MBR
> is already bogus.
but boot one replaces the MBR with better code and an fdisk table. It
does it have a 'bogus' fdisk table in it already. The on
I've messed with these a lot and I'm pretty sure that the bios is trying
to be 'compatible' with the geometry information it finds on the disk,
Theoretically, if you set up a disk with one brand X disk controller,
you'll get a different fake CHS mapping than you would with a brand Y
controller.
Hi all,
a week ago I asked this already on -questions but got no reply.
Therefore I pick -hackers as a more appropriate forum.
During my holidays I found the time (after a broken VCR and some crashed
hard disks) to work on video and sound recording on my new PC (details
below).
However, while /d
> Unfortunatly, sometimes when processes suddenly lose stdin/stdout, they
> jump into infinate loops and start eating cpu cycles like crazy. I'd
> hate
> to see what happens when you kill off a significant number of people
> running
> these poorly behaved programs. FVWM95 Taskbars used to be no
Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > > I wrote a little line program to do a revoke(), it was basically
> > >
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { revoke(argv[1]); }
> > >
> > > Now this doesn't kill a darn thing. And you should be aware of it! But it
> > > does forcibly "close" any open fd's pointing
> > I wrote a little line program to do a revoke(), it was basically
> >
> > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { revoke(argv[1]); }
> >
> > Now this doesn't kill a darn thing. And you should be aware of it! But it
> > does forcibly "close" any open fd's pointing at the tty in question, and
> >
> I wrote a little line program to do a revoke(), it was basically
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { revoke(argv[1]); }
>
> Now this doesn't kill a darn thing. And you should be aware of it! But it
> does forcibly "close" any open fd's pointing at the tty in question, and
> most programs
Hello,
Did you follow these steps?
http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistswitch/install.html
According to 1.1, support for versions of Freebsd > 3.3 is 'in the works'.
-mrh
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Hao Zhang wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I am familiar with the procedure of building a custom kerne
On 30-Oct-00 Matthew Jacob wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 30-Oct-00 David O'Brien wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:24:17PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
>> >> I think that the days of the 'dangerously dedicated partition' are
>> >> numbered.
>> >
>> > No
Has anyone got the AMD x86-64 SimNow Simulator running under linux emulation
in 4-STABLE?
http://www.x86-64.org/downloads/ for the curious.
--
GeoffB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Oct-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:24:17PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> >> I think that the days of the 'dangerously dedicated partition' are
> >> numbered.
> >
> > Not quite. We don't do slices on the Alpha -- i
Title: Building a custom kernel in 4.1
> Hello,
> I am familiar with the procedure of building a custom kernel under
> FreeBSD3.3 but having a lot of difficulty when trying to follow the
> procedure for FreeBSD4.1. Can anyone summarize the exact steps to build a
> custom kernel under FreeBSD
On 30-Oct-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Robert Nordier wrote:
>> Just doing the disklabel -w -r followed by the disklabel -B is creating
>> a dangerously dedicated disk,
>
> Actually this is a "fully dedicated" disk. (made to look like a 50MB or
> so disk
On 30-Oct-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:24:17PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
>> I think that the days of the 'dangerously dedicated partition' are
>> numbered.
>
> Not quite. We don't do slices on the Alpha -- in fact our slice code
> royally screws the Alpha users a
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Robert Nordier wrote:
> > Just doing the disklabel -w -r followed by the disklabel -B is creating
> > a dangerously dedicated disk,
>
> Actually this is a "fully dedicated" disk. (made to look like a 50MB or
> so disk to M$ produ
> a) Kill the controlling shell. This will leave some processes behind that
>are no longer part of the user's session (like programs that have
>detatched from the terminal and become daemons), and processes that
>were never part of the user's session (like processes that they started
:The original question still stands, and I'm quite interested in hearing
:an answer.
:
:I think Ryan's looking for an equivalent to Solaris' F_FREESP fcntl; I'm
:not aware that one exists in FBSD - right?
:
:jan
:
:--
:jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
No,
Never mind. I'm on drugs. That, and the PC industry loves selling "identical"
machines that aren't identical under the cover. I checked the chipset, and it
only does ATA33, unlike the other machine I bought from the same place, same
catalog number, same order, that does ATA66.
One note of interes
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:24:17PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> I think that the days of the 'dangerously dedicated partition' are
> numbered.
Not quite. We don't do slices on the Alpha -- in fact our slice code
royally screws the Alpha users as it isn't nicely layered and thus hard
to av
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon
writes:
> :I think there is more there than anyone wants to find out. Can you commit
> :your fixes to make disklabel label virgin slices please?
> :
> :John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
>
> Yah, it's done. I'll forw
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Robert Nordier wrote:
> Just doing the disklabel -w -r followed by the disklabel -B is creating
> a dangerously dedicated disk,
Actually this is a "fully dedicated" disk. (made to look like a 50MB or
so disk to M$ products)
Sysinstall is used to create
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes:
>
> On 28-Oct-00 Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon
> > writes:
> >> :Do you have dangerously dedicated mode on by chance? Some
> >> :SCSI BIOS's _will_ crash with this if you use dang
I receive such message using tcpdump... please help me what does it
mean...
> 01:57:30.616515 h4h.n0w.b3l0ngz.t0.xp.b3cuz.th3.ar3.lamerz.nu.1026 >
mydomain.com.domain: 28951+ NS? . (17) [tos 0x60]
> 01:57:30.618814 mydomain.com.domain >
h4h.n0w.b3l0ngz.t0.xp.b3cuz.th3.ar3.lamerz.nu.1026: 2895
Hi All,
This is a repost of my letter to freebsd-bugs which apparently went to
/dev/null or whereabouts. Since this is a developers' mailing list could
anybody with intimate knowledge of how FreeBSD threads work have a look ?
I do need this problem solved soon, please help.
I was pursuing a str
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Vadim Belman wrote:
>
> I've tried to use uplt instead of lpt and got a kernel panic. From kernel
> stack trace I found that it happens due to a wrong pointer to dev structure
> being passed to usbd_do_request_flags. I've made a PR for the problem
> (desp
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Ryan Thompson wrote:
> > (b) use tcgetpgrp to get the process group id of the foreground process
> > group on that tty, then with that info use libkvm to find the session
> > leader's pid and send it a SIGHUP
>
> Why not just kill their controlling shell?
I believe that w
The original question still stands, and I'm quite interested in hearing
an answer.
I think Ryan's looking for an equivalent to Solaris' F_FREESP fcntl; I'm
not aware that one exists in FBSD - right?
jan
--
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 928716
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> What is the best way to go about logging a user out given their tty? I had
> a couple of ideas:
>
> (a) open their tty and set the baud rate to 0
Probably wouldn't be very effective.
> (b) use tcgetpgrp to get the process group id of t
33 matches
Mail list logo
