On Saturday, August 26, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [2,640 lines removed]
... and this was at the bottom of the message you quoted:
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
At the very least, don't just mail a whole
On 22 Aug 2000, at 9:47, freebsd-hackers-digest wrote:
>
> freebsd-hackers-digestTuesday, August 22 2000Volume 04 : Number 927
>
>
>
> In this issue:
> [PATCH] 3-button microsoft-type serial mouse
> Updated driver for Mylex 160/170/352/2000/3000 controllers
> UNSUBSCRIBE
> Re: quotas
On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 07:00:55PM +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> Eric Kozowski wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:16:16PM +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Has anyone managed to configure a fbsd box as a Wavelan BS ?
> >
> > yes it's easy. which wavelan card are you using?
Jim Flowers wrote:
> Last I checked the wi driver will not do IBSS and says so in the
> documentation. I also tried it and couldn't get anywhere. Would be nice.
>
Jim,
do you mean Bill's driver doesn't do adhoc mode...? IBSS is independent BSS
which is adhoc mode...did you mean to say BSS ??
Last I checked the wi driver will not do IBSS and says so in the
documentation. I also tried it and couldn't get anywhere. Would be nice.
Even better would be to use the algos in their office router stuff. We're
looking at that now.
We currently use a fbsd box to connect the Internet to a Wav
Hi Doug...
Actually, it is a proper UDMA66 cable (so agrees the Promise UDMA66
controller I was playing with a while back).
But ... I'm not looking for UDMA66 speeds, like I mentioned - the
motherboard only supports UDMA33 anyways.
With a tip from another reply, I found this on Maxtor's website
Eric Kozowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:16:16PM +0100, Theo PAGTZIS wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Has anyone managed to configure a fbsd box as a Wavelan BS ?
>
> yes it's easy. which wavelan card are you using?
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebs
> are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
> some time ago and it may be useful to do the same in FreeBSD too.
Nope. The license for glibc is not one we'd want to use for such a
core component
> > > are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
> > > or medium future?
Thanks for all your replies. I perfectly understand the reasons for avoiding
GNU copylefted code like glibc in FreeBSD. Using the Hurd/Mach as kernel
replacement for FreeBSD would indeed require addi
FengYue wrote:
>
> Hi, I know this is an old topic but I don't seem to find answers
> to my questions in the mailing list archives.
>
> I'm wondering why FreeBSD did not implement the SYN cookies method
> that is currently implemented in Linux? To my best understanding,
> SYN cookie seems to be
Hi, I know this is an old topic but I don't seem to find answers
to my questions in the mailing list archives.
I'm wondering why FreeBSD did not implement the SYN cookies method
that is currently implemented in Linux? To my best understanding,
SYN cookie seems to be a better method against SYS
> > If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
> > Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
>
> I'll take a look...
Looks like perl brokenness. The missing boot_DynaLoader is in DynaLoader.a,
but there is no way of linking it in.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPA
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to write a PCI ethernet driver for FreeBSD 3.4 release.
BTW, just checking out the Procsys website I assume that you're working
on driver(s) for your 'Nakajima' PCI NICs. If that's the case, and also
assuming that these are based on off-the-shelf MAC parts, have y
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxime Henrion writes:
>Thanks for your help !
>
>If someone would be kind enough to answer them, I have a few other questions.
>I'm currently trying to modify sysctl_kern_proc() function in
>src/sys/kern/kern_proc.c
First: look at sysctl(3)
sysctl can read and se
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Farid Hajji writes:
>Hello,
>
>[please Cc: to me, since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks]
>
>are there plans to replace FreeBSD's libc with GNU glibc in the near
>or medium future? Linux moved also from it's own libc5 to glibc (=libc6)
>some time ago and it m
15 matches
Mail list logo