Anyone know how to get a 40gig IDE drive working under FreeBSD? It picks
it up as having 79000 odd sectors and says that the geometary is wrong,
and it doesnt work.
Any advice would be appreciated
Thanks
Andrew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacker
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, G.B.Naidu wrote:
> I am having problems with DDB while setting breakpoints in the kernel. I
> entered the DDB by giving kernel -d at boot prompt. After that I tried to
> set break point at ip_output() by giving "b ip_output". But it complains
> saying that "sumbol not found".
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply. We tried as per your mail. But still the DDB is
complaining the same saying that "symbol not found".
What could be the reason? Am I missing something in the whole process?
thanks
--gb
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Doug White wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, G.B.Naidu wrote
Jordan K. Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Does this mean we won't get the SMP stuff done next week?
>
> I'm back on the 15th (you gain 10 hours coming back) and the SMP
> meeting isn't until the 16th and 17th. Of course it will. :)
You mean 15th & 16th right? :)
--
Paul Saab
Technical
In message <7816.959911822@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
: I'll be in Japan (Tokyo/Nagoya/Osaka areas) from the 7th through the
: 12th and will be speaking at the Networld + INTEROP 2000 FreeBSD BOF
: on 6/8 as well as the Japan Unix Society meeting in Nagoya on 6/9.
: Anyone in these are
In message <7816.959911822@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
: I'll be in Japan (Tokyo/Nagoya/Osaka areas) from the 7th through the
: 12th and will be speaking at the Networld + INTEROP 2000 FreeBSD BOF
: on 6/8 as well as the Japan Unix Society meeting in Nagoya on 6/9.
: Anyone in these are
On Thursday, 1 June 2000 at 19:21:29 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> Does this mean we won't get the SMP stuff done next week?
>
> I'm back on the 15th (you gain 10 hours coming back) and the SMP
> meeting isn't until the 16th and 17th. Of course it will. :)
Ah, I didn't see that message. D
> Does this mean we won't get the SMP stuff done next week?
I'm back on the 15th (you gain 10 hours coming back) and the SMP
meeting isn't until the 16th and 17th. Of course it will. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of t
On Thursday, 1 June 2000 at 19:10:22 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I'll be in Japan (Tokyo/Nagoya/Osaka areas) from the 7th through the
> 12th and will be speaking at the Networld + INTEROP 2000 FreeBSD BOF
> on 6/8 as well as the Japan Unix Society meeting in Nagoya on 6/9.
> Anyone in these
I'll be in Japan (Tokyo/Nagoya/Osaka areas) from the 7th through the
12th and will be speaking at the Networld + INTEROP 2000 FreeBSD BOF
on 6/8 as well as the Japan Unix Society meeting in Nagoya on 6/9.
Anyone in these area is welcome to attend or simply join us afterwards
for dinner or somethin
Just following up on this - are there any plans to merge this work
back into the mainstream so that we can generate "localized" installation
floppies for the Japanese community in future releases? Thanks!
(Yes, I'm really catching up on email over a year old today).
- Jordan
> In <[EMAIL PROTE
Hello
In the paper "Experience With TCP/IP Networking Protocol S/W over
Embedded OS for Network Appliance" in computer society IEEE, it says:
The environment for the development of embedded OS
and TCP/IP protocol S/W. Embedded OS and TCP/IP module
are implemented by gnu c compiler, gcc-2.6.
...
> The problem is that the cards get swapped.
...
> It's a long story as to why switching cables, or changing which card gets
> which IP address isn't really a good solution. The short answer is that
i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
is the firewall config and rc.co
...
> The problem is that the cards get swapped.
...
> It's a long story as to why switching cables, or changing which card gets
> which IP address isn't really a good solution. The short answer is that
i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
is the firewall config and rc.co
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:19:29 -0600, Fred Clift wrote:
> > >
> > > i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
> > > is the firewall config and rc.conf -- can't you just make these
> > > scripts fetch the ethernet address of the c
At 04:24 PM 6/1/00 -0400, Joy Ganguly wrote:
>Dennis wrote:
>
>> At 12:13 PM 6/1/00 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis writes:
>> >: Have you done bus performance testing with this card? Given the
>> >: architechture of the AMCC part, it seems highly improbable tha
Dennis wrote:
> At 12:13 PM 6/1/00 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis writes:
> >: Have you done bus performance testing with this card? Given the
> >: architechture of the AMCC part, it seems highly improbable that you will be
> >: able to get high throughput with
Trying to use a "compat" driver with no isa ports and 4.0 complains (we
used to return a 1 and set the ioport to 0)..since you cant return a 0 from
probe, is there a trick to tell the system that there are no ports?
DB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
I had a power outage this morning and my 4.0-Stable system suddenly
started generating the following messages
Jun 1 09:38:55 opal /kernel: acd0: DVD-ROM at
ata1-master using PIO4
Jun 1 09:38:55 opal /kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a
Jun 1 09:38:55 opal /kernel: ad0: UDMA ICRC READ E
At 12:13 PM 6/1/00 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis writes:
>: Have you done bus performance testing with this card? Given the
>: architechture of the AMCC part, it seems highly improbable that you will be
>: able to get high throughput with such a card. Because the
>
> i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
> is the firewall config and rc.conf -- can't you just make these
> scripts fetch the ethernet address of the card(s), set a shell
> variable with the name of the good card, and go ahead with that ?
Yeah I'm about to the point of do
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis writes:
: Have you done bus performance testing with this card? Given the
: architechture of the AMCC part, it seems highly improbable that you will be
: able to get high throughput with such a card. Because the AMCC part
: requires external logic it is imposs
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:19:29 -0600, Fred Clift wrote:
> >
> > i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
> > is the firewall config and rc.conf -- can't you just make these
> > scripts fetch the ethernet address of the card(s), set a shell
> > variable with the name of the g
:It seems to be a problem in vm/vm_fault() and
:vnode_pager_generic_putpages() in FreeBSD 3.x & 4.0.
:
:The following code illustrates the problem:
:
:#include
:#include
:...
Yes, this is definitely a bug. I'll take a look at fixing it on
the weekend. I think what we have to do is a
...
> The problem is that the cards get swapped.
...
> It's a long story as to why switching cables, or changing which card gets
> which IP address isn't really a good solution. The short answer is that
i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
is the firewall config and rc.co
>
> i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
> is the firewall config and rc.conf -- can't you just make these
> scripts fetch the ethernet address of the card(s), set a shell
> variable with the name of the good card, and go ahead with that ?
Yeah I'm about to the point of d
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, G.B.Naidu wrote:
> Have posted this questoin earlier. I have got no replies. Some body take
> some time to clarify this?
cd /sys/boot
make depend all install
disklabel -B ad0
reboot
This will update your bootblocks.
> In the handbook chap 21, Note says: Note that if you hav
...
> The problem is that the cards get swapped.
...
> It's a long story as to why switching cables, or changing which card gets
> which IP address isn't really a good solution. The short answer is that
i suppose the only place where you use the actual card names
is the firewall config and rc.c
Hi. I've just switched to 4.0 right now and I have a problem.
(well the first problem is that I dont know enough about freebsd, but I
digress)
I have two fxp network cards in box (intel ether express pro 10/100), one
of which is integrated into the motherboard, the other of which is pluged
int
:it seems that
:
:mount a.b.c.d:/dir /mntpoint
:mount a.b.c.d:/dir2 /mntpoint
:
:will result in 2 mounts showing in the mount table. I dont recall this
:happening in 3.x, and it seems quite wrong. (shouldnt the second attempt
:return a busy)?
:
:DB
This is how it worked in 3.x too. The se
At 05:31 PM 5/31/00 -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> i have a atm oc3 care which uses the amcc S5933 PCI adapter. however the
>> driver reports "unable to map mem" at boot time. i used pciconf to read
>> the configuration space base address registers and all of them showed
>> 0x.
it seems that
mount a.b.c.d:/dir /mntpoint
mount a.b.c.d:/dir2 /mntpoint
will result in 2 mounts showing in the mount table. I dont recall this
happening in 3.x, and it seems quite wrong. (shouldnt the second attempt
return a busy)?
DB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
Hi,
Have posted this questoin earlier. I have got no replies. Some body take
some time to clarify this?
thanks
--gb
--
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 10:57:49 +0530 (IST)
From: G.B.Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: D
It seems to be a problem in vm/vm_fault() and
vnode_pager_generic_putpages() in FreeBSD 3.x & 4.0.
The following code illustrates the problem:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define COUNT 1024
#define SIZE10*1024*1024
int main () {
int i,j,fd;
char *fptr, fnam
34 matches
Mail list logo
