Thanks :-)
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr |
| The University of M
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 09:25:16PM +0700, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
> I'm trying to achive maximum performance of my FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE box,
> and going to recompile kernel and world using -Os -pipe options. Is there
> any additional flags I might consider turning on (like -mfast_math) to
> ma
:
:Why exactly whould you not touch the -march options? I have had no
:problems using them, and my system (5.0-CURRENT) seems a little faster
:with -march=i686. I could be wrong though as I havn't done any exact
:tests... it just seems a bit more responsive..
:
:==
Why exactly whould you not touch the -march options? I have had no
problems using them, and my system (5.0-CURRENT) seems a little faster
with -march=i686. I could be wrong though as I havn't done any exact
tests... it just seems a bit more responsive..
==
:On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
:
:> AFAIK, Linux Mandrake has it's kernel and userland highly optimized for
:> Pentium architecture. However, they have additional gcc optimization
:> flags turned on by default, including -O3 and -mfast_math.
:
:Can you say "gimmick"? :-) gcc oft
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
> AFAIK, Linux Mandrake has it's kernel and userland highly optimized for
> Pentium architecture. However, they have additional gcc optimization
> flags turned on by default, including -O3 and -mfast_math.
Can you say "gimmick"? :-) gcc often prod
:> they connected to
:> server and recieved nothing, yet the server does not register the
:> connection or request for info. If I run the client independently (not
:> via fork/execlp) everything works just fine.
:>
:> This code is deployed and operational on BSDi without a problem, so I
:> ass
I can't get there. Latency & packetloss too high from my cable modem in
NL.
Amusingly the route goes through the US :)
- J
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 12:47:16PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I guess the thing to do is to make sure they have the same d
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote:
> > >
> > > Not trying to push this idea one way or the other, I'm just
> > > curious as to WHY so many people think this is a "bad idea"
> > >
> > I can think of four things real quick:
> >
> > 1) Disks are muc
* Sean Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000408 09:47] wrote:
> Alfred,
>
> Here is the code being used.
ew. :P There seems to be some problems in your tcp connect library...
> while((result !=1)&&(result!=TCP_CONNECT_NONE)&&(timeout!=10)){
> result = tcp_get_conn(localhostname,port1,10,&sock1);
Alfred,
Here is the code being used.
This is the Server Code, xxx are the IP of box, yyy is port this server is
listening too passed to the client
user_port = socket_config();
while (y<1){
if(!fork()){
printf("Starting Client %d\n",getpid());
close(user_port);
execlp("./client","
* Sean Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000408 07:58] wrote:
>
> I am having a bizarre problem with a system on FreeBSD.
>
> The system consists of a server who forks its clients.
> When the clients are forked, they try to connect to the server and get
> information. Unfortunately when they fork off (
I doubt Mandrake gets any significant performance boost from using gcc with
optimisation levels beyond -O. They just use this "super optimised" to
stand out from all other Linux crowd rather than for any practical purpose. It
has been reported several times that optimisation levels O2 ang higher a
FWIW, I understand that they carry pgcc (http://www.goof.com) which may
be very risky under Linux. Linus doesn't even recommend the latest gcc
because he likes to keep his kernel dependent on the old (non-standard)
features.
Look in the archives, I recall someone benchmarked the new gcc on this
l
I am having a bizarre problem with a system on FreeBSD.
The system consists of a server who forks its clients.
When the clients are forked, they try to connect to the server and get
information. Unfortunately when they fork off (fork/execlp), they say
they connected to
server and recieved nothi
Hi!
AFAIK, Linux Mandrake has it's kernel and userland highly optimized for
Pentium architecture. However, they have additional gcc optimization
flags turned on by default, including -O3 and -mfast_math.
I'm trying to achive maximum performance of my FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE box,
and going to recom
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
> If a program links with libcrypt and libcrypt is linked to libscrypt (MD5
> version) instead of libdescrypt (DES version), then that program will use
> MD5.
>
Got it. Thanks.
Cheers,
/* Alexey N. Dokuchaev, more commonly |
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I am using FreeBSD 4.0. The thing is, that I want DES sources and
> > > libraries hanging around (just in case), but
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 31-Jan-00 R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> > how do i incorporate the XFree stuff into a freebsd release so that
> > it is in
> > acceptable format for sysinstall?
>
> Download the binary packages from XFree86.org..
>
> Someone was working on making the
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am using FreeBSD 4.0. The thing is, that I want DES sources and
> > libraries hanging around (just in case), but the whole system be MD5 based
> > (including /sbin/init, other
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using FreeBSD 4.0. The thing is, that I want DES sources and
> libraries hanging around (just in case), but the whole system be MD5 based
> (including /sbin/init, other utils, and correct links in /lib). I looked
> at /etc/defaul
Hello!
I am using FreeBSD 4.0. The thing is, that I want DES sources and
libraries hanging around (just in case), but the whole system be MD5 based
(including /sbin/init, other utils, and correct links in /lib). I looked
at /etc/defaults/make.conf, but didn't and references of this kind, except
> > Mark Murray would know :-)
> >
> > I think there's a lot of stale cruft on ftp.internat.freebsd.org which
> > doesn't need to be mirrored - Mark could probably tell us all which bits
> > are suitable for mirroring (this should be documented somewhere for
> > posterity)
Mostly packages and di
Problem:
I don't know how to configure the spooler to properly handshake
with a postscript printer (via standard parallel port).
Background:
I am trying to improve printer connectivity in my wife's graphic design
office. The basic idea I had was to take the direct-attached postscript
printers t
24 matches
Mail list logo
