On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
> i've got two systems, one a pentium 233 with adaptec 2940, scsi, using vinum
> running a big postgresql database, and a new one, dual pentium 550, dual adaptec
> 29160, not using vinum, and another big postgresql database.
>
> the first system runs 3
i've got two systems, one a pentium 233 with adaptec 2940, scsi, using vinum
running a big postgresql database, and a new one, dual pentium 550, dual adaptec
29160, not using vinum, and another big postgresql database.
the first system runs 3.4-stable and gets spontaneous reboots infrequently,
a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wes Peters writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>>
>> >I'd like to be able to do some simple spl locking in a driver that I'm
>> >writing. While I could go the splhigh() route, I'm concerned that
>> >spending
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>
> >I'd like to be able to do some simple spl locking in a driver that I'm
> >writing. While I could go the splhigh() route, I'm concerned that
> >spending lots of time at splhigh could cause problems, and some of
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
> : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guido van Rooij writes:
> : > : perhaps we need some mutex mechanism?
> : >
> : > Yes. Right now the mutex mechanism that we have is blocking of
> : > interrupts when the bit is set in t
Dennis wrote:
>
> I hope your happy,
I'll be happier when you stop FUD'ing two separate FreeBSD development
lists with your bleating about this driver.
> but do you know the answer to my question? Has the
> driver been updated recently?
Define "updated" and "recently". On which code branch?
i have always problems when trying to work with the
inet_addr(), inet_network() ,inet_ntoa() functions ,when changin
in the ip_input file:
i got error like(when making):
ip_input.o(.text+0xce9):undefined reference to
'__inet_addr'
Hi-
dissent.p200.box kernel log messages:
> wd1s1f: wdstart: timeout waiting to give command writing fsbn 262208 of
>262208-262223 (wd1s1 bn 7430208; cn
462 tn 129 sn 51) (status d0 error 0)
> wd1s1f: wdstart: timeout waiting to give command writing fsbn 262208 of
>262208-262223 (wd1s1 bn 7430
It's also the case that there's never been anything in the
release/3.x-STABLE or release/4.x-STABLE directories except a package
link since those directories are there only for sysinstall, they're
not for humans to go to and browse. Humans looking for actual source
code for these branches should
Well shuck my corn and call me Sally. I will try it out.
Esp after I figure out to make this AirConnect work with
the Apple AirPort.
Stefan
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > The FreeBSD driver doesn't currently support encryption, correct.
>
> Incorrect.
>
> > I'm going to h
>I hope your happy, but do you know the answer to my question? Has the
>driver been updated recently?
Not to fix the problem that you are reporting. The solution might be as
simple as adding another PHY identifier to the list of supported ones. I need
to find some time to sit down with one of
I hope your happy, but do you know the answer to my question? Has the
driver been updated recently?
DB
At 11:49 AM 3/18/00 -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
>Dennis wrote:
>>
>> Is there a version of the fxp driver that works with intels latest boards
>> without giving the "unsupported PHY" message? A
>
> The FreeBSD driver doesn't currently support encryption, correct.
Incorrect.
> I'm going to have to figure this out soon, since we're going to turn
> encryption on soon. I'd be ecstatic if someone else figured it out
> first =)
As I posted just a little while ago, we were using WEP at Lin
...redirecting to -questions
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Mourad Lakhdar wrote:
>
> hi every body:
>
>
> when i change in the kernel , i config it , made : make depend
>
> while doing >make
>
> i got the error :
>
> /var : write failed , file system is full
> cpp: /var/tmp/ccT1684.i:N
With Encryption? From last I saw it is not an option.
Stefan
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> >I know the WaveLAN stuff is crap
>
> Actually, I've had terrific luck with WaveLAN IEEE stuff on laptops
> for the last year or so. I'm not sure what's so bad about it?...
>
> Bill
[ long email --- there's a specific question at the end ]
I've started work a couple of weeks ago to port the NSS implementation
from NetBSD to FreeBSD. This is needed for things like authenticating
with an LDAP server, etc. If you search for LDAP in Hackers you'll find
a thread that discusses wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dave McKay writes:
: Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
Yes.
: The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
: are third party software. I think the proper place for these
: is the Bugt
Darrell,
> > I'm trying to initialize a network device, and I'm trying to download
> > code *into* my device from some binary system files. There is no "user
> > space" or user process, for that matter, to deal with at this point. I
> > just want to (at this step) open a file(s) directly from m
I have a BookPC with a built in Davi Comm 10/100 ethernet card.
I am always getting
/kernel: dc0: watchdog timeout
every few minutes..
Can thease errors be stopped?
Thank you for any reply
RP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacke
* Dave McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000320 14:18] wrote:
> Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
> The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
> are third party software. I think the proper place for these
> is the Bugtraq mailing list on securityfocus.com.
I have an Airport configuration utility almost usable, if you're interested
in trying it. (It doesn't support configuring keys yet, although I think
I know where they're stored so if you want to experiment...)
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hac
Dennis wrote:
> Well its gone from cdrom.com which is where i usually get it
cdrom.com has not been the correct location for a *long* time (like 4+
years!). The proper hostname is ftp.freebsd.org - that hasn't changed
and the paths there are still perfectly valid.
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsu
Er, I meant the 3.x driver =) How embarassing.
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Well its gone from cdrom.com which is where i usually get it
ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/3.4-STABLE/
is just a packages directory. cdrom.com redirects you to
freesoftware.com...just FYI.
Dennis
At 11:49 AM 3/18/00 -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
>Dennis wrote:
>>
>> Is
1. Put more descriptive subjects, it'll help people with less time
locate the questions they can and/or want to answer.
2. Try one of these:
-get a new /var with more space
-use vinum so you can add more hds to add space
-make one of the larger directories on /var a symli
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 06:32:49PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> The FreeBSD driver doesn't currently support encryption, correct.
> The Linux driver does, so perhaps it would be fairly easy to port the
> functionality, and the Linux driver is dual-licensed under GPL and BSD
> licenses so there's
The FreeBSD driver doesn't currently support encryption, correct.
The Linux driver does, so perhaps it would be fairly easy to port the
functionality, and the Linux driver is dual-licensed under GPL and BSD
licenses so there's no worry of GPL contamination.
ftp://sourceforge.org/pcmcia/contrib/wa
hi every body:
when i change in the kernel , i config it , made : make depend
while doing >make
i got the error :
/var : write failed , file system is full
cpp: /var/tmp/ccT1684.i:No space left on device
error code 1
stop
so what should i do
best regards,
To
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guido van Rooij writes:
: > : perhaps we need some mutex mechanism?
: >
: > Yes. Right now the mutex mechanism that we have is blocking of
: > interrupts when the bit is set in the cpl. I guess I'm a little too
> > : perhaps we need some mutex mechanism?
> >
> > Yes. Right now the mutex mechanism that we have is blocking of
> > interrupts when the bit is set in the cpl. I guess I'm a little too
> > close to the mechanism and need to step back.
> >
> > You are right that I'm asking for a call that is
Is it necessary to post ports security advisories? YES.
Should they be on this list? You think not. And until a list exists for
security on FreeBSD not related to core OS/packages, this is the best
forum for it, as it relates to FreeBSD Security.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dave McKay wrote:
> Is i
* David Malone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000316 16:51]:
> I've tried this over my slip link and it does seem to reduce the
> number of packets sent by 2 for telnetting to the daytime port. I
> also had a look at fetch (the only thing in the tree which uses
> MSG_EOF at the moment), which has an option
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guido van Rooij writes:
> : perhaps we need some mutex mechanism?
>
> Yes. Right now the mutex mechanism that we have is blocking of
> interrupts when the bit is set in the cpl. I guess I'm a little too
> close to the mechanism and need to
I would like to subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I think that it is a necessary thing to do, since these programs are
offered in the ports collection, and this is -security after all. It
was nice and convienant to have the advisories posted because I just
happened to have completed installing lynx-ssl from the ports collection
mere hours befor
Don't post to multiple lists; it's rude. I'll reply to both so others
on -hackers won't think noone replied and reply, too.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, FreeBSD MAIL wrote:
> I have tried using dd on serveral 4.0 systems in order to capture an image off a
>cdrom.
>
> I tried dd if=/dev/acd0a of=file.
Dave McKay wrote:
> Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
> The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
> are third party software. I think the proper place for these
> is the Bugtraq mailing list on securityfocus.com. Also to add
> to the arguments, mo
Is it really necessary to post the ports security advisories?
The exploitable programs are not part of the FreeBSD OS, they
are third party software. I think the proper place for these
is the Bugtraq mailing list on securityfocus.com. Also to add
to the arguments, most of the advisories are not
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guido van Rooij writes:
: perhaps we need some mutex mechanism?
Yes. Right now the mutex mechanism that we have is blocking of
interrupts when the bit is set in the cpl. I guess I'm a little too
close to the mechanism and need to step back.
You are right that I'
I have tried using dd on serveral 4.0 systems in order to capture an image off a cdrom.
I tried dd if=/dev/acd0a of=file.img as well as on a scsi system (/dev/cd0a) and
eovery other cd device (/dev/acd0c /cdv/racd0c /dev/cd0c ect) and I get
dd: /dev/acd0a Bad address
0+0 records in
0+0 records
> >I know the WaveLAN stuff is crap
>
> Actually, I've had terrific luck with WaveLAN IEEE stuff on laptops
> for the last year or so. I'm not sure what's so bad about it?...
Agreed. WaveLAN hardware is good stuff. We deployed 200+ users in a
network, and aside from the normal problems associ
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 01:31:28PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> I'd like to be able to do some simple spl locking in a driver that I'm
> writing. While I could go the splhigh() route, I'm concerned that
> spending lots of time at splhigh could cause problems, and some of my
> critical sections
Has anyone thought of Unicode support on FreeBSD?
I think that it is inevitable that eventually FreeBSD
will *need* to support unicode if it wants to continue
as a viable operating system in the future. This means
that it probably will need to be modified from the
ground up. I am not well verse
>I know the WaveLAN stuff is crap
Actually, I've had terrific luck with WaveLAN IEEE stuff on laptops
for the last year or so. I'm not sure what's so bad about it?...
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[moved to FreeBSD-questions -- *again* ]
On Friday, 17 March 2000 at 9:09:41 -0400, Rafael Gomez wrote:
> Can any of you send me a copy of a text kernel file?
This is the second time you've sent a message which we can't
understand to FreeBSD-hackers. The first time I told you to post to
FreeBS
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>I'd like to be able to do some simple spl locking in a driver that I'm
>writing. While I could go the splhigh() route, I'm concerned that
>spending lots of time at splhigh could cause problems, and some of my
>critical sections look to be very
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Gary T. Corcoran wrote:
>
> I'm trying to initialize a network device, and I'm trying to download
> code *into* my device from some binary system files. There is no "user
> space" or user process, for that matter, to deal with at this point. I
> just want to (at this step) op
47 matches
Mail list logo
