Hi there, sorry to bother you, just want to as two quick questions ..
I looked as examples at ncp.ko and nwfs.ko ???
1) If i look in the compiled nwfs directory, what is the __hack_file for ??,
and the ncp file ( not the ncp.ko ) in the nwfs directory ?? ( I am actually
able to load this ncp fil
:On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:06:24AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
:> Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
:> > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
:> > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
:> > wd0s1a/ 50MB
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:06:24AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
> > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
> > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS
Sorry if this is a repost but I didnt see it come throug yet and my mail was
screwed up.
I am working with a BookPC whith an intel 810 all in one chipset.
I was wondering if there was planned support for the sound and if someone
has heard anyting about the Xfree86 (linux) LKM being ported to Fre
> Bottom line: I think it should stay the way it is now. :-)
And since I agree, I suspect it will. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
> what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
> wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
> wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
> wd0s1e/var
Mike Walker wrote:
> > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
> > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
> > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
> > wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
> > wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
> > wd0s1f/usr 18
> I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
> what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
> wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
> wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
> wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
> wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y
>
> the /var one s
* Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000307 17:49] wrote:
> I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
> what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
> wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
> wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
> wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
>
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see
what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk:
wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y
wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP
wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y
wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y
the /var one struck me as real
John Polstra wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I already have code for MPPC/MPPE, minus the proprietary STAC
> > code and the patented RC4 algorithm,
>
> I have read in several places that only the name "RC4" is trademarked,
>
>
> >
> >
> > We're having a problem where very very rarely we get a segfault on exec of
> > something, and I finally caught it:
> >
Ack... Ignore this whole thread... The first backtrace looked like
builtin_new was causing this... someone replaced my new/delete in this, and
didn't tell me.
>
>
> We're having a problem where very very rarely we get a segfault on exec of
> something, and I finally caught it:
>
Here's a better backtrace, sorry. :)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2813862d in vfprintf () from /usr/lib/libc.so.3
(gdb) bt
#0 0x2813862d in vfpr
We're having a problem where very very rarely we get a segfault on exec of
something, and I finally caught it:
# gdb menu
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distrib
John Polstra writes:
> > I already have code for MPPC/MPPE, minus the proprietary STAC
> > code and the patented RC4 algorithm,
>
> I have read in several places that only the name "RC4" is trademarked,
> and that the algorithm itself is not patented. Is that not the case?
Oops, my mi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have code for MPPC/MPPE, minus the proprietary STAC
> code and the patented RC4 algorithm,
I have read in several places that only the name "RC4" is trademarked,
and that the algorithm itself is not pa
> > > > Imagine: cp file file2, file and file2 reference the same exact blocks,
> > > > but modified chunks of file2 would be given their own private blocks.
> > >
> > > This is not a microsoft innovation, actually, I believe it was a VMS
> > > innovation. It's called a generational filesystem.
> "Jim" == Jim Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> This is not a microsoft innovation, actually, I believe it
Jim> was a VMS innovation. It's called a generational filesystem.
Jim> the original is stored, and later generations of the file are
Jim> stored as diffs.
IIRC,
Juergen Lock writes:
> > when this is done the netgraph PPP nodes (which can support
> > these compression types will be usable.
>
> They could, but they don't yet, right? :)
>
> Maybe it still should be added to ijppp first cause debugging user
> processes is easier than the kernel... and at
Hellmuth Michaelis writes:
> > to add a negraph interface to the B channels should be quite easy.
> > If you need help I can prbably almost do most of it..
>
> Its already in the development sources (Archie had a look at it already)
> and it works with mppd. It was really quite easy, although if
> My laptop running 3.4-RELEASE decided it doesn't want to boot.
> It was uncleanly shut down via the power switch by someone
> who thought they were shutting down a different machine.
>
> Now when it boots, running fsck gives this result:
>
> > chip0: rev 0x01 on pci0.0.0
> > chip1: rev 0x02
* David Scheidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000307 11:18]:
>
> esc-M ctrl-V will give you version info, at least in ksh88. Neither HP nor
> Solaris appear to use ksh93.
>
Solaris' ksh93 implementation is /usr/dt/bin/dtksh (Version M-12/28/93d).
--
Arindum
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Monday, March 06, 2000, Max Khon wrote:
> > However, under Solaris 2.6:
> > clone$uname -a
> > SunOS clone 5.6 Generic_105181-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1-Engine
> > clone$/bin/ksh
> > clone$for i in ; do echo $i; done
> > /bin/ksh: syntax error: `;'
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, David E. Cross wrote:
:Version 2 of the lock manager is ready to be released. Amitha
:says that it passes all of the tests in the suite posted by Drew (thanks
:Drew). A noteable exception to this is on SGI where some lock requests
:are never even received from the remote hos
here is a module that compiles into the ucd-snmp agent which allows access
to a (at this time) limited selection of the data for all the ipfw rules.
it can be fetched from:
ftp://ftp.reptiles.org/pub/FreeBSD/other/ucdipfw-0.1.tar.gz
here is the attached readme:
ucd-snmp support for IPFW rules
On 07-Mar-00 Johan Kruger wrote:
> But now it still looks as if the two modules dont know about each other.
> Is there an example of something like this lying around ??? How do i
> (link)
> the symbols to the second KLD loaded ???
I don't see why this wouldn't work..
eg b is dependant on a?
Tr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chet Ramey writes:
>> for f in $$empty_list ${SUBDIRS}; do ...
>Not bad, but will break if the shell is run with the `-u' option on
>for some reason.
Ok, how about:
for f in $$IFS ${SUBDIRS}; do ...
Ian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
hi, there!
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > >: to
> > >:
> > >: sh_subdirs=${SUBDIRS}; for f in $$sh_subdirs ; do ...
> > >
> >
> > >there's lots of other workarounds, from seeing if SUBDIRS is defined,
> > >to using make's .foreach.
> >
> > Another option is:
> >
> > for f
I am busy to convert two lkm's to kld's and having some problem with it.
-
KLD's on 3-STABLE and 4.0-CURRENT
-
The scenario is two lkm's ( now kld's ) which are loaded dependantly ( A and B
)
I used to load them as :
/sbin/modload -o /tmp/
29 matches
Mail list logo
