On Friday, 11 February 2000 at 10:49:24 +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> PIII/500, 128 MB
>
> I'm wondering if this is trustable:
>
>> bonnie -s 400
> File './Bonnie.14321', size: 419430400
> Writing with putc()...done
> Rewriting...done
> Writing intelligently...done
> Reading with getc()...don
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> >
> > One key thing to keep in mind is that copyrights apply automatically
> > regardless of age, contracts etc. You have no right to copy a copyrighted
> > work unless the right to do so is given to you (or you have statutory
> > rights such as ma
Brian Beattie wrote:
> I have an older 486 system, running 3.4R that has a cmos clock that seems
> to be unwilling to accept years out side the range 94-99. The bios seems
> willing to set dates between 1994-2099, but after reboot any year not
> between 94-99 is converted to {20,19}94.
>
> What
Brian Beattie wrote:
>
> I have an older 486 system, running 3.4R that has a cmos clock that seems
> to be unwilling to accept years out side the range 94-99. The bios seems
> willing to set dates between 1994-2099, but after reboot any year not
> between 94-99 is converted to {20,19}94.
>
> Wh
At 23:31 12.02.00 +0100, you wrote:
>I got 4 machines at home on an Ethernet coax.
>A-B-C-D.
>B is FreeBSD server (samba), the rest is win98 (C is split win/fbsd).
>
>C and D talks fine to B. A talks nicely to C (haven't tried to D), but very
>poorly to B.
>I got ping losses of 1 out of 3 to 4 f
I got 4 machines at home on an Ethernet coax.
A-B-C-D.
B is FreeBSD server (samba), the rest is win98 (C is split win/fbsd).
C and D talks fine to B. A talks nicely to C (haven't tried to D), but very poorly to
B.
I got ping losses of 1 out of 3 to 4 from A to B, but no loss A to C.
I then too
First of all, don't crosspost to both -hackers and -current. They tend to
cover the same audience.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, David E. Cross wrote:
> I realize that we are all very busy and the coming 4.0-RELEASE has also
> compounded things, but I have heard nothing back on the rpc.lockd that
> was
I have an older 486 system, running 3.4R that has a cmos clock that seems
to be unwilling to accept years out side the range 94-99. The bios seems
willing to set dates between 1994-2099, but after reboot any year not
between 94-99 is converted to {20,19}94.
What I have done is to go into i386/is
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any way currently to emit a message from
within kernel, so that syslogd can pick it up later on, but without
spoiling the standard message buffer. AFAIK, there is no way to do it
right now.
The reason I'm asking is that quite a few programs (most notably
ipfw) spi
hello,
[moving from -questions, as no answers received]
I'm running a PPP dialup server. (mgetty-autoppp) Is there any way to do
login accounting (like solaris' PAM modules, or linux pam_limits.so)
Basically, I have to limit simultaneous connections, and monthly login
times.
-- mauzi
To Uns
This is a leftover from me trying a different Ethernet card. It does not
work without that lineI still get the same symptoms.
Thanks,
Dan Diephouse
Parag Patel wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:40:29 EST, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
> >nebula:\
> >:tc=.default:\
> >:ha=b2
Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> One key thing to keep in mind is that copyrights apply automatically
> regardless of age, contracts etc. You have no right to copy a copyrighted
> work unless the right to do so is given to you (or you have statutory
> rights such as making backups etc). In this case, you
I don't think this is the very right place to put this message, but I
don't really want to subscribe to high-traffic mailing lists and maybe
this is a device problem...
The device is /dev/fd0 (standart 1,44 IDE floppy, controller fdc). When
accessing bad floppy disks the kernel complains for a
I have been trying to turn a 486 that I have into a diskless workstation
and have not gotten very far. I have compiled Etherboot, and set up the
server with tftp and bootp. I have both daemons enabled. When I boot
up the 486 machine tcpdump yields this:
[root:dragon]# tcpdump -i de0 -e
tcpdump
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 06:03:16PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I presume its the client that is locking up? If you remove the
> server binary and the client takes a page fault on the binary,
> and does not have the page in the cache, what is supposed to happen
> is that the p
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Steve Hocking wrote:
>
> Are there any existing examples of this happening? I'm doing a version of the
> Linux joystick driver ported to FreeBSD and of course some of the devices are
> PnP.
You need to dike out the unknown driver (near the end of
sys/isa/isa_common.c). I'
16 matches
Mail list logo
