On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
> The handbook instructions are for kernel-generated panics; for a manual
> panic like yours, the stack is unimportant. The easiest way to see
> which processes are active is to run this:
>
> (kgdb) source /usr/src/sys/modules/vinum/.gdbinit.kernel
Inter
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> A backtrace is not likely to be useful, but a 'ps' (from DDB) may be.
>
> It might also be useful to leave 'systat -vm 1' and 'vmstat 1' running
> to see if the system is doing any paging or other significant work at
> the time of the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:35:37 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anybody comment on whether or not this is a good patch?
Nope, but I _can_ suggest that you send it to the right place. :-)
Please see the Patching Procedures section of the NTP web page:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/n
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Where is a good place for me to place an advertisement for "intrusion
> > testers"? We are in no way connected with any law enforcement or Government
> > agency. We are a computer investigations firm in Florida and have
Can anybody comment on whether or not this is a good patch?
--- Forwarded Message
From: Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:24:32 -0500
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROT
Where i can get info about it ?
===
visi0n
AUX Technologies
[www.aux-tech.org]
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Charles Randall wrote:
> From: Jason Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Thread stacks have a default size of
/usr/src/usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c line 736 of the file on my system:
$FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c,v 1.34 2000/01/15 00:20:21 davidn Exp
The line in question:
if (!PWALTDIR() && getarg(args, 'm') != NULL && pwd->pw_dir && *pwd->pw_dir == '/' &&
pwd->pw_dir[1]) {
The conditional !PWALTDIR()
I have managed to snatch up a pair of PCIIA compatible IEEE488
cards locally and I have found a HP59401A HP-IB analyser for $60
at eBay :-) so I'll go over the two pieces of code we have for
FreeBSD and look at the linux stuff and come up with some code over
spring/summer.
Should any of you stu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> YAMAMOTO Shigeru writes:
: In a CardBus system, a start address of status register must be aligned on
: 4KB boundaries.
: Such kind of address alignment is required at mapping meory window,
: expansion ROM and etc.
True.
: I think we use bus_alloc_resource() to map
In the last episode (Jan 18), spork said:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > CTRL-ALT-ESC, and at the prompt type in 'panic'. You'll need DDB
> > compiled into the kernel, and crashdumps enabled.
>
> By now, you should know my next question... What am I looking at? I
> built a kernel
:> CTRL-ALT-ESC, and at the prompt type in 'panic'. You'll need DDB
:> compiled into the kernel, and crashdumps enabled.
:
:By now, you should know my next question... What am I looking at? I
:built a kernel with "config -g" and the debugger option and made it panic
:while sitting at a load of
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > That's another thing, the box is idle as we've yet to move it into
> > production. Out of curiousity, how does one make a machine panic
> > manually?
>
> CTRL-ALT-ESC, and at the prompt type in 'panic'. You'll need DDB
> compiled into the kernel, and
Running a relatively recent 3.4-STABLE:
If you use the -V option to specify an alternate master.passwd/conf file
location, then the -m option apparently doesn't work.
I get users added to my alt pw file, but no home dir creation.
Removing the -V /altdir option adds them to /etc/master.pa
I thought it would be nice if one could create locked accounts with
adduser. So I asked my nice Perl-hacking coworker Evan Leon to come up
with a patch.
Enter password []:
Use an empty password or lock the password? lock no [yes]: lock
...
# grep user /etc/master.passwd
user:*:1001:1001::0:0
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where is a good place for me to place an advertisement for "intrusion
> testers"? We are in no way connected with any law enforcement or Government
> agency. We are a computer investigations firm in Florida and have an urgent
> need for some of
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where is a good place for me to place an advertisement for "intrusion
> testers"? We are in no way connected with any law enforcement or Government
> agency. We are a computer investigations firm in Florida and have an urgent
> need for some of
Where is a good place for me to place an advertisement for "intrusion
testers"? We are in no way connected with any law enforcement or Government
agency. We are a computer investigations firm in Florida and have an urgent
need for some of these individuals. We are a global company with a D&N
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Delta 1.40 to ffs_softdep.c (12/16/1999) fixes the `hanging
> while holding a lock' problem. It should be propagated to the
> 3.X branch.
>
> I have been working on a number of performance improvements to
> soft updates that will hopefully assist in the
I've always been able to 'fix' dangerously dedicated IDE disks by running
DOS's fdisk with the /mbr switch. That overwrites the MBR, and at least
puts it back into a state friendly with other operating systems...
Ken Bolingbroke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> On
In the last episode (Jan 18), spork said:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Jan 18), spork said:
>
> > I'm not sure what the problem is. You're 97% idle. Maybe the hosted
> > web sites on this machine are slightly more active than the ones on the
> > other box
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jan 18), spork said:
> I'm not sure what the problem is. You're 97% idle. Maybe the hosted
> web sites on this machine are slightly more active than the ones on the
> other box. You could always manually panic the box and see what
From: Jason Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Thread stacks have a default size of 64kB.
As you know, stack size can be explicitly set using
pthread_attr_setstacksize().
However, note that Solaris uses a pthread stack size of 1 MB. Porter beware.
>libc_r now uses growable stacks with "guard pag
In the last episode (Jan 18), spork said:
> I'm trying my luck over here at -hackers, I already posted to
> -questions and -isp without any resolution. I'm including my
> original post and below that a summary of some responses and my
> answers... The bulk of the recent answers seem to say "you
Hi,
I'm trying my luck over here at -hackers, I already posted to -questions
and -isp without any resolution. I'm including my original post and below
that a summary of some responses and my answers... The bulk of the
recent answers seem to say "you should see a load of 3.0 on a machine with
50
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Brian Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > In a week or two. I just committed the fix to -current, and the rule
> > is to wait a week or two before MFC.
>
> MFC?
>
> Could somebody expand this TLA for me, I'm sure it will be obvious once I
>
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> In a week or two. I just committed the fix to -current, and the rule
> is to wait a week or two before MFC.
MFC?
Could somebody expand this TLA for me, I'm sure it will be obvious once I
see it, thanks
Brian Beattie| The only problem wi
Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> > >OK, with everyones help (well, waiting for the right time of day ;-)),
> > I
> > >was able to reproduce this. The initial threads last active time was
> > >not getting initialized to a sane value, causing negative
> > computations
> > >of the threads timeslice dep
Alexander Litvin wrote:
> > Try this patch - you may have to hand apply it as my sources are not
> > yet up to date with the last round of changes that Jason made.
>
> > Dan Eischen
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [patch skipped]
>
> Yep, that seems to be it. No moon-dependent irregularities ;)
>
>
Please RTFM at
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL
DocWilco
>>> Mahyus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/18 1:18 PM >>>
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe:
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> >OK, with everyones help (well, waiting for the right time of day ;-)),
> I
> >was able to reproduce this. The initial threads last active time was
> >not getting initialized to a sane value, causing negative
> computations
> >of the threads timeslice depending on what time of day it was. Funn
31 matches
Mail list logo
