On Thursday, 30 December 1999 at 22:34:04 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
>> That is interesting. So I guess the conclusion to this is, softupdates
>> is useful for bursty IO, but not sustained because it can get far behind
>> until it eventually reaches the point where the machine reboots silently.
>
I've got one currently and my FreeBSD box can do 3000-3300kBytes a second
without any complaints..
Full duplex has it's advantages, no doubt
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > get r
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> when running saturation tests and never able to figure out what
> was causing it.
I have a good reason to revive thi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fri Dec 31 23:59:56 CET 1999
> Fri Dec 31 23:59:57 CET 1999
> Fri Dec 31 23:59:58 CET 1999
> Fri Dec 31 23:59:59 CET 1999
> Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 CET 1900
> Sat Jan 1 00:00:01 CET 1900
> Sat Jan 1 00:00:02 CET 1900
> Sat Jan
Fri Dec 31 23:59:56 CET 1999
Fri Dec 31 23:59:57 CET 1999
Fri Dec 31 23:59:58 CET 1999
Fri Dec 31 23:59:59 CET 1999
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 CET 2000
Sat Jan 1 00:00:01 CET 2000
Sat Jan 1 00:00:02 CET 2000
Sat Jan 1 00:00:03 CET 2000
In short: yes it works.
Happy New Millenium to all of you!
--
Bjorn Danielsson wrote:
>
> I have made a small patch (about 10 lines of code) to "cron" that lets
> people choose between localtime and gmtime for their crontab entries.
> The choice is made depending on the setting of an environment variable
> in the crontab file. The cost is a factor 2 for the
: How many instances of postmark are you running? I used 4 separate
:instances (you must run them in separate directories).
Well, you didn't say that! :-) I'm running one. I'll start up
another couple to match your test.
: How fast are your disks? I used an external RAID-5 array t
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate
> :softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots
> :(silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up.
> :
> :This is a much
:
:FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate
:softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots
:(silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up.
:
:This is a much smaller system of course, with smaller memory and fi
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 09:19:37AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> It seems that all the reported problems so far are on -stable
> systems. I wonder if the same problem occurs under -current?
>
> Also, all the reported problems so far are under 3.3 (for example,
> hub is running 3
It seems that all the reported problems so far are on -stable
systems. I wonder if the same problem occurs under -current?
Also, all the reported problems so far are under 3.3 (for example,
hub is running 3.3-RC in a Sep 12 build). How about 3.4?
It may be possible to mitig
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 08:49:01AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate
> softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots
> (silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up.
>
> This
It seems Bill Swingle wrote:
>
> Below is a list of chipsets that we're still lacking. If you have any
> cards that have these chips on them, and would like to see support for them
> added or improved please consider sending them to us. Due to the
> sheer number of cards we'll be handling and th
13 matches
Mail list logo
