In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John and Jennifer Reynolds
writes:
: When you say 8-bit-clean, what exactly does that mean? I've heard that phrase
: several times in the past N months, but don't honestly know what it implies.
: (I did a few searches in various places looking for the jargon, but ca
It seems Steve Ames wrote:
> >
> > Both reports "dont care" fields in the ata conformance field
> > thereby being set as ATA-0 disks. Since I've put in test
> > to only enable WDMA2 on at least ATA-2 disks and only enable
> > UDMA2 on at least ATA-3 disks, well your disks are not even
> > tried. Y
> > > Just for the sake of my curiosity, what was modifiying
> > > resolv.conf? Is this a security feature?
Ran into a similar "what's changing this file?" problem a while ago --
fstat(1) is your friend...
#!/bin/sh
while true
do
fstat /etc/resolv.conf >> /fstatlogfile
done
Throw that int
> Drives that report their capabilities right :)
> > ad0: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as master
> > ad0: 1554MB (3183264 sectors), 3158 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> > ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, PIO
> > ad1: ATA-0 disk at ata0 as slave
> > ad1: 4134MB (8467200 sectors), 8960 cyls, 15 heads, 63
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 09:57:36PM -0700, John and Jennifer Reynolds wrote:
> > tn-gw isn't 8-bit-clean; you'll need to patch it. Try something like
> > this: it creates a new tn-gw-> prompt command called "rawopen" which
> > gives you an 8-bit-clean link to whatever host/port you specify.
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Something in the daily scripts seemed to eliminate the
> > first line, containing the local nameserver. I say this
> > because the file date was 1:59am, the time that periodic/daily
> > runs. I put it back every day, and the next day, it was gone again.
> >
> > I hunted qu
[ On Friday, December 17, Mark Newton wrote: ]
>
> > but upon trying to ssh from work to my box I get this error message:
> > Local: Corrupted check bytes on input.
>
> tn-gw isn't 8-bit-clean; you'll need to patch it. Try something like
> this: it creates a new tn-gw-> prompt command c
I know little about all things Sun, but a quick grep in NetBSD-current
reveals:
sys/dev/sun/disklabel.h
sys/arch/sparc/sparc/disksubr.c
Could be what you're looking for.
- ad
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> [redirected to -hackers]
>
> On Sunday, 12 December 1999 at 8:34:51 -0500, David Bein wrote:
> > Hi ...
> >
> > I have a PC with triple boot partitions setup, one of
> > which is loaded with Solaris 2.7 (officially called version 7).
> > I am wondering if anyone has any
> Something in the daily scripts seemed to eliminate the
> first line, containing the local nameserver. I say this
> because the file date was 1:59am, the time that periodic/daily
> runs. I put it back every day, and the next day, it was gone again.
>
> I hunted quite a while in the scripts, but c
I posted this to -questions, but didn't really
get any answer that seemed to fit, so I thought
I would ask here.
On a 3.3-RELEASE box, not realizing at first that
I didn't need an entry for the local nameserver, I
had it's IP in as the first line in resolv.conf, followed
by two more nameservers o
> Reading the XFree86 docs, it seems almost all PCI cards are
> supported multihead on Linux where they can issue an INT 10
> call to initialise the BIOS in the secondary card.
> I'm not sure it we can support that in FreeBSD.
We can. If you want to write the XFree86 code for it for FreeBSD, ple
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 11:09:33AM -0700, John and Jennifer Reynolds wrote:
> but upon trying to ssh from work to my box I get this error message:
> Local: Corrupted check bytes on input.
tn-gw isn't 8-bit-clean; you'll need to patch it. Try something like
this: it creates a new tn-gw->
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 01:28:14PM +0100, Oyvind Moll wrote:
> * Egervary Gergely
> |
> | > XFree86 was written to support one monitor per VGA chip
> | > and cannot cope with 2 RAMDACs on one controller.
> |
> | ok then need to use pci cards. damn.
>
> Is it possible to use one AGP card and one
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Looks like a firewall to me. Either a firewall in a router
> sitting between the hosts, or an ipfw setup sitting on one or the
> other host.
I set up the NFS server in question ages ago. I haven't looked at the
problem, but... The server
hello hackers,
I have a rather bizzare problem and I'm hoping that somebody here can help me
find the solution or at least other places to go look.
At work, we use the tn-gw software to allow users to telnet out to hosts
outside our firewall when necessary. There is some software called tn-gw-n
:Hi folks,
:
:I've been trying to accomplish the simple task of mounting filesystems
:from a central server 'hostA' onto a new client 'hostB'. the new client
:has a basic 3.3 'bin' distrib installed on it and I am trying to mount
:/usr/src & /usr/obj from hostA so that I can upgrade it.
:
:the pro
Hi folks,
I've been trying to accomplish the simple task of mounting filesystems
from a central server 'hostA' onto a new client 'hostB'. the new client
has a basic 3.3 'bin' distrib installed on it and I am trying to mount
/usr/src & /usr/obj from hostA so that I can upgrade it.
the problem is
Roger Hardiman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to build some new Multi-Head FreeBSD machines
> in my lab using XFree86 3.9.16.
>
> I want to know which VGA cards to buy
> for Multi-Head (dual monitor) support.
>
> Currently I have 1 multi-head FreeBSD machine using
> Matrox Millenium cards abd XFree
Hi,
> > The Dual-Head G400 (the one in a single AGP card) does not
> > work with XFree86.
> >
> It works fine with XFree86 using only one monitor output.
Sorry, I was unclear with my last statement.
The Dual-Head G400 is cannot be used with XFree86
as a Dual-Head card, but is great for use with
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Roger Hardiman wrote:
> The Dual-Head G400 (the one in a single AGP card) does not
> work with XFree86.
>
It works fine with XFree86 using only one monitor output, however. It's
a very nice card, even without the dual monitor support.
--
Kyle Mestery| A
* Egervary Gergely
|
| > XFree86 was written to support one monitor per VGA chip
| > and cannot cope with 2 RAMDACs on one controller.
|
| ok then need to use pci cards. damn.
Is it possible to use one AGP card and one PCI card together?
(e.g. PCI Matrox Mill. I + AGP Matrox Mill. II)
The releas
> XFree86 was written to support one monitor per VGA chip
> and cannot cope with 2 RAMDACs on one controller.
ok then need to use pci cards. damn.
-- mauzi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> > I need to build some new Multi-Head FreeBSD machines
> > in my lab using XFree86 3.9.16.
> >
> > I want to know which VGA cards to buy
> > for Multi-Head (dual monitor) support.
> >
> matrox :)
>
> g200 / g400
>
> you can buy dual-head cards, or use more than one card (pci only)
The Dual-He
> I need to build some new Multi-Head FreeBSD machines
> in my lab using XFree86 3.9.16.
>
> I want to know which VGA cards to buy
> for Multi-Head (dual monitor) support.
>
> Currently I have 1 multi-head FreeBSD machine using
> Matrox Millenium cards abd XFree86 3.9.16.
> It works great, but y
Hi,
I need to build some new Multi-Head FreeBSD machines
in my lab using XFree86 3.9.16.
I want to know which VGA cards to buy
for Multi-Head (dual monitor) support.
Currently I have 1 multi-head FreeBSD machine using
Matrox Millenium cards abd XFree86 3.9.16.
It works great, but you cannot buy
Hi Warner,
Thanks for your detailed writeup of the direction that you want to go in.
>
> What can you do to help?
>
Well, firstly I'd like to get the xe driver under FreeBSD. But before I
even get to that stage, I'll have to learn about the pccard subsystem,
and more about the FreeBSD kernel
27 matches
Mail list logo
