>
> Has anyone toyed with the idea of implementing a swap-based filesystem
> similar to Sun's tmpfs?
Like, oh, MFS maybe?
Try 'man -k mfs'.
--
\\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith
\\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ and he'll
Has anyone toyed with the idea of implementing a swap-based filesystem
similar to Sun's tmpfs?
Chuck Youse
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Vladimir N. Silyaev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:16:00PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> > The bochs port implements a pseudo-ne2000 using BPF under FreeBSD, is
> > this approach a possibility? The freebsd ether stuff from bochs has
> > Peter Grehan ([EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:16:00PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> The bochs port implements a pseudo-ne2000 using BPF under FreeBSD, is
> this approach a possibility? The freebsd ether stuff from bochs has
> Peter Grehan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on the copyright so he'd be the
> one to contact
I can grep through the vmcore.x file and find the offset of the string
I put on the stack by
strings -t x http://www.velocet.net/~dgilbert | are precisely opposite. |
=GLO
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
At 12:04 PM -0700 12/1/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> > >> On a single system, if st_dev and st_ino are equal, you must be
> > >> referring to the same object. If not, I'd like to hear about it.
> > >
> > >This assumption has always caused lots of pain and suffering for
> > >distributed file system peop
+[ Vladimir N. Silyaev ]-
|
| > Vladimir's web page they don't work:
| >
| > "
| >- All networking
| > This require FreeBSD version of vmnet driver
| > "
|
| Exactly, and vmware distribution have the sources of this driver.
| But this
> On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> >
> > Dec 2 11:08:56 bifrost /kernel: sio0: 208 more tty-level buffer overflows (total
>3356)
> >
> > is appearing on our ppp machine. What are tty-level buffer overflows?
> > How can I fix this? What resource is running out?
>
> If I remember p
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> Dec 2 11:08:56 bifrost /kernel: sio0: 208 more tty-level buffer overflows (total
>3356)
>
> is appearing on our ppp machine. What are tty-level buffer overflows?
> How can I fix this? What resource is running out?
If I remember properly, it is a r
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:34:04PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying the new port now. I seem to have a problem with the
> > vmware emulator program dying due to some panic caused by an
> > uncaught signal whenever I try to save a configuration.
>
> Same here. But that also happene
Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> Anybody here have the time/inclination/ability to review a *draft* of the
> proposed BitKeeper license to see if it would be acceptable for use by
> FreeBSD?
I'm not sure what you mean by "acceptable for use by FreeBSD".
If you mean, could we include BitKeeper as a port
Dec 2 11:08:56 bifrost /kernel: sio0: 208 more tty-level buffer overflows (total 3356)
is appearing on our ppp machine. What are tty-level buffer overflows?
How can I fix this? What resource is running out?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
At 2:37 PM -0800 12/2/99, Julian Elischer wrote:
>Might it be an idea to allow the setup program to have an option
>"Send word back to FreeBSD.org that this model of machine works".
>
>or maybe, just a version of send-pr that does that, and uses a
>different template:
I think openbsd asks users t
"perlbug -ok" does the same thing for Perl. I added the first version of
this a few years ago. Perhaps "send-pr -ok"?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Chris D. Faulhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 3:44 PM
To: Julian Elischer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Might it be an idea to allow the setup program to have an option
> "Send word back to FreeBSD.org that this model of machine works".
>
> or maybe, just a version of send-pr that does that, and uses a different
> template:
>
> Laptop: {yes/No}
> M
Might it be an idea to allow the setup program to have an option
"Send word back to FreeBSD.org that this model of machine works".
or maybe, just a version of send-pr that does that, and uses a different
template:
Laptop: {yes/No}
Manufacturer:
Model:
#If you don't have a model number fill in
As Louis A. Mamakos wrote ...
> > >The console complaints about the ioctl are gone now. Unfortunately VMware
> > >still complains. I'll try to findout why.
> >
> > Try to load new vmware port from:
> > http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/vmware.tar.gz
> >
> > And reinstall it. I thi
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Randell Jesup wrote:
>> >> On a single system, if st_dev and st_ino are equal, you must be referring
>> >> to the same object. If not, I'd like to hear about it.
>> >
>> >This assumption has always caused lots of pain and suffering for
>> >distributed file
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>:I was just playing with mmap() really for the first time, and I noticed
>:something a bit odd. When you mmap() a file for writing, it also appears
>:to require that you give it read permissions, else it dies on a signal 10.
>
>I've got a few hundred
Well, I only wanted to help see whether the BitKeeper licence is somehow
usable for *BSD. The comments about SCCS are ill considered and not on
point. This isn't a discussion as to whether CVS will be deepsixed. This
is only a discussion about broadening tool support for *BSD.
To Unsubscri
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> I used to know that memory to memory copy is done by the DMA controller in
> the I/O bridge (Actually, this knowledge confues me because DMA controller
Now, that brings back memories :-)
check out the original dma chip design, ca. infinite years ago. W
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>I am DAVICOM Semiconductor, Inc. software engineer,
>our company want to develop the FreeBSD driver for
>our DM9102 LAN chip, and I have found some LAN cards
>FreeBSD driver code at web site http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul.
>
>The following are my problems,
Dear Sir,
I am DAVICOM Semiconductor, Inc. software engineer,
our company want to develop the FreeBSD driver for
our DM9102 LAN chip, and I have found some LAN cards
FreeBSD driver code at web site http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul.
The following are my problems, can you reply them for me?
1. Can I
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 01:57:57PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> >On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> -On [19991202 07:00], Matthew Jacob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >> Anybody here have the time/inclination/ability to review a *draft* of the
&g
>On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Harlan Stenn wrote:
-On [19991202 07:00], Matthew Jacob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Anybody here have the time/inclination/ability to review a *draft* of the
>> proposed BitKeeper license to see if it would be acceptable for use by
>> FreeBSD?
>
Include before
- Dave R. -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
The structures are identical because they are what the SCSI spec specifies
that's what they look like..
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
>
> > > @@ -1273,6 +1273,11 @@
> > > return error;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +case LINUX_
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > > + if (!error) {
> > > + lvol = *lvolp;
> > > + lvol.channel0 = bsd_vol.vol[0];
> > > + lvol.channel1 = bsd_vol.vol[1];
> > > + lvol.channel2 = bsd_vol.vol[2];
> > > + lvol.channel3 = bsd_vol.vol[3];
> >
> > FYI the k
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 01:00:16AM -0800, Manny Obrey wrote:
> Hello,
> This may be a simple error on my part but I've narrowed my prob to
> the snippet below.
>
> When trying to compile:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main () { return 0;}
>
> I get error messages which state parse errors i
Hi ...
> > to fit in with CDIOCGETVOL which has two different structures.
> >
> > Marcel please review this :)
>
> Please hold your horses. I have a completely rewritten linux_ioctl.c
> waiting to be committed. I'm already working on the ioctl stuff with
> Vladimir as to synchronize the change.
> > + {
> > + u_char channel0;
> > + u_char channel1;
> > + u_char channel2;
> > + u_char channel3;
> > + };
> > +
> > struct linux_cdrom_subchnl
> > {
> > u_char cdsc_format;
> > ***
> > *** 1232,1237
> > --- 1240,1261
>
>
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > + if (!error) {
> > + lvol = *lvolp;
> > + lvol.channel0 = bsd_vol.vol[0];
> > + lvol.channel1 = bsd_vol.vol[1];
> > + lvol.channel2 = bsd_vol.vol[2];
> > + lvol.channel3 = bsd_vol.vol[3];
>
> FYI the kernel structures are
Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> I've made a change that removed the complaint from vmware before Vladimar
> fixed it in the kernel module. It is the implementation of LINUX_CDROMVOLREAD
> to fit in with CDIOCGETVOL which has two different structures.
>
> Marcel please review this :)
Please hold y
Hello,
This may be a simple error on my part but I've narrowed my prob to
the snippet below.
When trying to compile:
#include
#include
int main () { return 0;}
I get error messages which state parse errors in
/usr/include/sys/socket.h
my compiler =gcc 2.7 ( also tried gcc 2.95.1 )
my os
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> > @@ -1273,6 +1273,11 @@
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > +case LINUX_CDROMVOLREAD: {
> > + args->arg = CDIOGETVOL;
> > + return (ioctl(p, (struct ioctl_args *)args));
> > +}
> > +
> > case LINUX_OSS_GETVERSION: {
> >
35 matches
Mail list logo
