Re: Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet?

1999-11-02 Thread Xuan Chen
Thanks a lot for you all! I got it work now. Cheers, -chen On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Wes Peters wrote: > Xuan Chen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Guy Middleton wrote: > > > > > Does anybody have a Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet adapter working with > > > FreeBSD? I'm using version 3.2, installe

Re: gas pseudo-ops

1999-11-02 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephane E. Potvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have any idea where I could find some documentation about > the following gas pseudo-ops? > .type ,@object There is a type associated with symbol in the object files. It can be function (obvious), o

Re: Vinum or CCD? (was: CCD questions)

1999-11-02 Thread Wes Peters
Jim Carroll wrote: > > > :> Because Vinum is being maintained, and because Vinum will allow you to > > :> stripe your disks instead of simple concatenate them, which will probably > > :> result in better I/O rates. > > Can someone provide a URL for Vinum. I have been following this thread for

Re: Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet?

1999-11-02 Thread Wes Peters
Xuan Chen wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Guy Middleton wrote: > > > Does anybody have a Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet adapter working with > > FreeBSD? I'm using version 3.2, installed from the distribution CD. > > Mine is Netgear FA310tx. It was "detected", but under the name of the > network

Re: kernel config not remembered in 3.2-RELEASE

1999-11-02 Thread Wes Peters
Guy Middleton wrote: > > I just installed 3.2-RELEASE on a new machine, and discovered that the > kernel config modifications (made with 'boot -c' at boot time) are not > remembered. Has the mechanism for saving them changed? They used to be > stored in /kernel.config, but that file appears not

RE: FreeBSD reboots

1999-11-02 Thread Julian Elischer
because it breaks teh standard and teh networking guru's don't like it. Basically in the face of broken clients, (read PCs) the TCP protocol can gather an unacceptable collection of fin-wait-2 sessions. THis is in the way the protocol was designed. To reduce it we revert to fin-wait-1 and resent

Re: Granularity of disk I/O

1999-11-02 Thread Greg Lehey
On Tuesday, 2 November 1999 at 17:10:41 -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > It is said that the granularity of disk I/O is a sector. I read a little > bit of the source code isa/wd.c, which I think is the driver of IDE disks. > I find out that the disk can perform multi-block I/O sometimes. Does this

Granularity of disk I/O

1999-11-02 Thread Zhihui Zhang
It is said that the granularity of disk I/O is a sector. I read a little bit of the source code isa/wd.c, which I think is the driver of IDE disks. I find out that the disk can perform multi-block I/O sometimes. Does this mean the granularity of disk I/O can be multi-sector? If the disk can pe

Re: Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet?

1999-11-02 Thread Gert-Jan Vons
At 13:58 1999-11-02 -0800, you wrote: >Mine is Netgear FA310tx. It was "detected", but under the name of the >network card from another vendor---En Lite...or something similar. But, >did not work at all. Any idea? My Netgear FA310TX (Lite-On chipset) is detected as pn0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100Ba

Re: Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet?

1999-11-02 Thread Xuan Chen
Mine is Netgear FA310tx. It was "detected", but under the name of the network card from another vendor---En Lite...or something similar. But, did not work at all. Any idea? Thanks. -chen On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Guy Middleton wrote: > Does anybody have a Netgear FA410 pccard ethernet adapter working

RE: FreeBSD reboots

1999-11-02 Thread Charles Randall
From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >I have a patch to fix the fin-wait-2 problem.. Any reason this could't be applied to -stable with a corresponding sysctl variable? Charles To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the mes

kernel config not remembered in 3.2-RELEASE

1999-11-02 Thread Guy Middleton
I just installed 3.2-RELEASE on a new machine, and discovered that the kernel config modifications (made with 'boot -c' at boot time) are not remembered. Has the mechanism for saving them changed? They used to be stored in /kernel.config, but that file appears not to be used now. -Guy Middleto

Re: wfd0: i/o error, status=51 , error=40

1999-11-02 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote: > "Chris D. Faulhaber" wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote: > > > > > That is the message i get at the console when i try to write some thing > > > in my IDE ZIP drive! > > > Have anyone already faced such a

Re: wfd0: i/o error, status=51 , error=40

1999-11-02 Thread Gustavo V G C Rios
"Chris D. Faulhaber" wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote: > > > That is the message i get at the console when i try to write some thing > > in my IDE ZIP drive! > > Have anyone already faced such a problem ? > > Does any one here know how to fix it ? > > >

vn question

1999-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
Is the vn device able to read 4.3G files and treat them like a disk? I know we use it for building floppies and the like, but a 4.3G disk image from an unnamed laptop is what I have a need to access... Will it read the mbr and give me the slices that were there when I had the bits on a disk rath

FreeBSD at IETF (was: Re: IETF gettogether)

1999-11-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > How about Wednesday for dinner (1730-1930 EST) before the open plenary? Since no one has objected to this time, I thought I'd repost and notify those interested that I think the Wednesday dinner sounds like a good time to do it. Offhand, I forget th

Re: FreeBSD at IETF (was: Re: IETF gettogether)

1999-11-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Graham Wheeler wrote: > On Tue, 02 Nov 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > How about Wednesday for dinner (1730-1930 EST) before the open plenary? > > > > Anyhow, for anyone interested--we'll be holding a FreeBSD-oriented dinn

Re: FreeBSD at IETF (was: Re: IETF gettogether)

1999-11-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > > > How about Wednesday for dinner (1730-1930 EST) before the open > plenary? > > where would we be getting together? As I mention in my email, probably initially in the lobby, and then moving on to some local restaurant. If we get a number of

Re: IDA driver issues upon installation. Probing devices hangs

1999-11-02 Thread Jan Østerskov
On Tue, 02 Nov 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > None of the interested developers have access to one of these machines > anymore; it's quite possible that things have been changed or broken > to some degree of late. > > > I am trying to install the stable snapshot from 10301999 on a compaq > > proliant

Re: VTun...

1999-11-02 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> > I notice that you support traffic shaping. I was wondering > > if you plan to > > offer support for slower than 8KBytes / sec (64Kbits/s). if you are on FreeBSD you can as well use dummynet for traffic shaping. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE

aio Functions

1999-11-02 Thread Ricardo Bernardini
Hello list! I'm starting with aio functions (aio_read, aio_return, etc.), I've made them work with disk file I/O, now I'm trying with TCP sockets not with the same success. Does anyone know if it is posible to do what I'm trying? Or where to find more info about this function group? I'just rea

Re: Vinum or CCD? (was: CCD questions)

1999-11-02 Thread David Scheidt
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Jim Carroll wrote: > > :> Because Vinum is being maintained, and because Vinum will allow you to > > :> stripe your disks instead of simple concatenate them, which will probably > > :> result in better I/O rates. > > Can someone provide a URL for Vinum. I have been followin

Re: Vinum or CCD? (was: CCD questions)

1999-11-02 Thread Jim Carroll
> :> Because Vinum is being maintained, and because Vinum will allow you to > :> stripe your disks instead of simple concatenate them, which will probably > :> result in better I/O rates. Can someone provide a URL for Vinum. I have been following this thread for awhile, and would like to see m

Re: Vinum or CCD? (was: CCD questions)

1999-11-02 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> :> Because Vinum is being maintained, and because Vinum will allow you to :> stripe your disks instead of simple concatenate them, which will probably :> result in better I/O rates. : :In fact, CCD will stripe for you as well. In such configurations, :there isn't much difference between CCD a

Re: wfd0: i/o error, status=51 , error=40

1999-11-02 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote: > That is the message i get at the console when i try to write some thing > in my IDE ZIP drive! > Have anyone already faced such a problem ? > Does any one here know how to fix it ? > Could you provide the relevant part of dmesg W

wfd0: i/o error, status=51 , error=40

1999-11-02 Thread Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios
That is the message i get at the console when i try to write some thing in my IDE ZIP drive! Have anyone already faced such a problem ? Does any one here know how to fix it ? The message appears at my console forever, and the only thing i can do is to power-off the system by hand, even a "halt"

Re: FreeBSD at IETF (was: Re: IETF gettogether)

1999-11-02 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
> How about Wednesday for dinner (1730-1930 EST) before the open plenary? where would we be getting together? jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: FreeBSD at IETF (was: Re: IETF gettogether)

1999-11-02 Thread Graham Wheeler
On Tue, 02 Nov 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > > > How about Wednesday for dinner (1730-1930 EST) before the open plenary? > > Anyhow, for anyone interested--we'll be holding a FreeBSD-oriented dinner > at November IETF in Washington, DC, and the detail

Re: NASM programs for freebsd

1999-11-02 Thread Oren Sarig
Well, there are a few catches here. 1) You might have compiled things wrong. Try compiling it this way: nasm -f elf -o test.o test.asm ld -o test test.o You can also link a gcc .o file in here 2) FreeBSD uses protected mode. DOS originally didn't, so it has backwards compatability, but fbsd does

Re: Ping - sized tests with 0% and 100% packet loss! Any ideas?

1999-11-02 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 06:24:18PM -0800, Tamiji Homma wrote: > > Happens to me to on -current, but not -stable. With -current's > > ping on stable it doesn't happen, and with -stable's ping on > > -current it still happens. Therefore it must be a kernel bug. > > Can you recompile ping without -O

Hiding dynamic IPs

1999-11-02 Thread Graham Wheeler
Hi all I have a program which requires static IP addresses for various reasons. It could be changed to handle dynamic IPs but this would be a fairly significant undertaking and would probably be quite kludgy, involving the generation of scripts that have to be run every time the link goes up and

Re: RTLD_GLOBAL/RTLD_LOCAL dlopen mode flags

1999-11-02 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, John Polstra wrote: > > Are there any plans to implement RTLD_GLOBAL/RTLD_LOCAL mode flags for > > dlopen? > > RTLD_GLOBAL has been supported in -current since around the > beginning of September. great. I think that manpage should be brought up to date with -cur