Well, whaddya know... thanks...
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > Well, the section 9 man pages are pretty complete. The device driver
> > stuff is actually pretty easily available. In fact, this instead of
> > performance was supposed to be one of the main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (W Gerald Hicks) writes:
> I don't have a shiny new K7 yet, where I might expect the haifa
> build to make more of a difference than my crusty old Pentium...
Processors with out-of-order execution benefit *less* from scheduling
than non-OOO superscalar processors.
To Unsubsc
Is there any way to use a bt848 as a web cam or streaming video server
through any format other than the metor .ppm
snapshots.
Thanks in advance
Richard Puga
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use id-utils (/usr/ports/devel/id-utils). It builds a single database
> file and has a variety of tools (including e-lisp) to search the database.
>
> Since global(1) was mentioned in this threaad, I decided to have a look
> at it. It seems much slow
I do not know whether it is a good idea to determine the number of open
files of a process by enabling fdesc in the kernel. Anyway, I do the
following:
# mount_fdesc -o union fdesc /dev
# ls -al /dev/fd > list
> cat list
total 1
crw--- 1 root tty 12, 0 Oct 15 17:09 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 ro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dan Seguin writes:
: As I mentioned in my post, we're looking for the Kernel API specs. We
: don't need the source, just the (credible, authoritive) info on Kernel
: functions and their return values.
No such animal exists. Sun has many levels of API commitment fro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dan Seguin writes:
: I'm looking for information pertaining to the Solaris 2.x Kernel. We're
: writing auditing tools for system calls, and therefore need to write
: loadable modules (I've done this in FreeBSD, works flawlessly).
For docs on suns, I usually go to:
Matthew Jacob wrote:
> Well, the section 9 man pages are pretty complete. The device driver
> stuff is actually pretty easily available. In fact, this instead of
> performance was supposed to be one of the main design goals for Solaris
> (and I know- I was part of that effort- Gawd, I'm *sorry*...
I'm trying to set some intelligent resource limits on a CGI server
setup, and I'm running into trouble with it. I've set the memoryuse option
in login.conf and that does seem to kill them off, but I'd like to be able
to fine tune the limits down a little more, while still not interfering
w
Well, the section 9 man pages are pretty complete. The device driver
stuff is actually pretty easily available. In fact, this instead of
performance was supposed to be one of the main design goals for Solaris
(and I know- I was part of that effort- Gawd, I'm *sorry*.)
There *is* a DDK- I can
Hi. Thanks for your response.
As I mentioned in my post, we're looking for the Kernel API specs. We
don't need the source, just the (credible, authoritive) info on Kernel
functions and their return values.
We have to do this legally, but are having tons of trouble trying to find
the right peo
> Out of curiosity, were the benchmarks done with any of the Haifa
> command-line-options, notably -fsched-interblock, -fsched-spec,
> -fsched-spec-load, and -fbranch-count-reg ?
> (toplev.c, grep for '#ifdef HAIFA', and read the comments
> scattered elsewhere (haifa-sched.c))
Not yet, but thank
Hi all. I know this isn't a Solaris group, but you guys tend to know loads
of stuff about other Unices, so:
I'm looking for information pertaining to the Solaris 2.x Kernel. We're
writing auditing tools for system calls, and therefore need to write
loadable modules (I've done this in FreeBSD, w
Talk to me.
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Dan Seguin wrote:
>
>
> Hi all. I know this isn't a Solaris group, but you guys tend to know loads
> of stuff about other Unices, so:
>
> I'm looking for information pertaining to the Solaris 2.x Kernel. We're
> writing auditing tools for system calls, and t
> Hi all,
> I'm using the following call to set the ttl value (after doing a successful
> socket call)
> --
> ttl=5;
> if (setsockopt(sockfd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_TTL,
> (char *)&ttl, sizeof(ttl)) < 0)
> {
>printf("\nserv.c:
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 21:34:15 +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote:
> I made a private patch for nvi(1) that enable you to use new variable '@'
> in arguments of ex's ! or !! command.
Be sure to pass this on to this contributed software's maintainer, Keith
Bostic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
> People, does anybody made policy routing under freebsd?
> I have to substitute different aliased IP's source address when packet
departs
> from the same interface but with another destinations rather then default.
It's relative simple if your source addresses are on the different IP
networks.
B
Out of curiosity, were the benchmarks done with any of the Haifa
command-line-options, notably -fsched-interblock, -fsched-spec,
-fsched-spec-load, and -fbranch-count-reg ?
(toplev.c, grep for '#ifdef HAIFA', and read the comments
scattered elsewhere (haifa-sched.c))
Sean.
To Unsubscri
Hi,
I made a private patch for nvi(1) that enable you to use new variable '@'
in arguments of ex's ! or !! command.
The '@' is similar to '%' which means the editing file name.
If you are editing file.c at 110 line then ':!echo @' means ':!echo 110'.
It is convenient to use with gozilla(1).
If
Hi all,
I'm using the following call to set the ttl value (after doing a successful
socket call)
--
ttl=5;
if (setsockopt(sockfd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_TTL,
(char *)&ttl, sizeof(ttl)) < 0)
{
printf("\nserv.c: setting of TTL
People, does anybody made policy routing under freebsd?
I have to substitute different aliased IP's source address when packet departs
from the same interface but with another destinations rather then default.
There is similar feature in linux (each alias address related with an kind of
"subinterf
Why on 3.3-RELEASE getty (and other programs) takes to much memory ?
On 2.2-STABLE i have:
# ps axlw|grep getty
0 306 1 0 3 0 188 144 ttyin Is+ v00:00.07 /usr/libexec/getty
Pc0 ttyv0
0 15745 1 0 3 0 184 364 ttyin Is+ v30:00.01 /usr/libexec/getty
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Narvi wrote:
[snip]
> According to my vague recollectiosn from the early times of egcs when
> faifa was integrated, etc. part of the problem is that to have haifa be
> really effective, all old kluges need be removed...
>
> Something that back then happened/had happened onl
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to W Gerald Hicks:
> > Just curious what effect using the --enable-haifa flag for building
> > gcc-2.95.1/x86 would have so I did a comparison using the Dhrystone
> > benchmark from /usr/ports/benchmarks/bytebench.
>
> I think the Haifa sc
FYI:
The last make world (from a delta of 3 weeks) caused:
Oct 14 10:01:48 brunte /kernel: ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or
write data phase
Oct 14 10:02:04 brunte /kernel: ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or
write data phase
The entertaining thing is that _
25 matches
Mail list logo
