> >> Is there a way to force a Freebsd system to route to the same logican IP
> >> network rather than send a redirect?
> >>
> >> The situation occurs with segmented bridges where customers on the same
> >> logical IP network are on separate bridge groups. When trying to reach one
> >> another, t
Under what conditions does bind(2) set errno to EAGAIN? The 3.2R bind(2)
manual page does not list that as a valid value for errno when bind returns
-1.
This came up when using http_load (http://www.acme.com/software/http_load)
to stress-test a local web server. In other words, using http_load to
Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
> > That's actually a good idea. Tell you what, you read the previous
> > threads and prepare a good FAQ entry in docbook, send me the patches
> > and I'll commit it.
>
> I'll take you up on this, if you can guarantee that it'll show up
> on the FreeBSD web page FAQ
:Hi,
:
:The system in question (3.3-stable) needs to use a large FS (ca. 40GB).
:The defaults for such filesystem are ridiculous, given that it will hold
:at most couple of hundred big data files. So, my question is:
:
:* should I change the cpg (default 16) to some bigger value?
No, let newf
In brief: I'm developing drivers for the Mylex DAC960/1100 and AMI
MegaRAID/Dell PERC/HP whatever families of RAID controllers,
and I need some more hardware to test with. Details below.
Current status:
- Mylex DAC960 driver works with P/PL/PD/PU controllers. Support
What do you all think about
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~green/OpenBSD.libc_r.cancel.patch
? I isolated the set of commits that added cancelling to OpenBSD's
libc_r, and it seems (since they took it from us originally :) it
should be relatively simple to port :/
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman
It most likely is. I've found a pretty reliable way to crash Netscape 4.6
and 4.7-freebsd (either us or export): Open two windows, and visit
slashdot in both of them.
Don't ask me _why_ it works, but it does. :)
It causes the BSDI version to hang and chew CPU. The linux and windoze
versions o
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Pat Dirks wrote:
> as "local". As part of this "adoption" process the users is prompted to
> choose one of two ways to handle the existing permissions on the disk:
>
> * Retain them as-is (useful for cases where you have external
> reasons to believe
>the nume
>
> Hi,
>
> The system in question (3.3-stable) needs to use a large FS (ca. 40GB).
> The defaults for such filesystem are ridiculous, given that it will hold
> at most couple of hundred big data files. So, my question is:
>
> * should I change the cpg (default 16) to some bigger value?
> * is
Greetings -
I have installed FBSD 3.3-R on an HP Kayak XU, and have run into some
interesting problems with the AMD PCNet-Fast (if_lnc) driver. This
machine has an HP combo card (PN #5183-2725 or #5064-3616) with
NCR SCSI and AMD PCNet-Fast chipsets.
While booting up, I get the following kernel m
> Digital Unix, aka Compaq Tru64 Unix, formerly know as DEC OSF/1
> supports this syntax. In fact, this is the only syntax it supports,
> IIRC, so FreeBSD is not the only OS to use it.
You are not correct when you state that this is the only syntax it
supports. Digital Unix does support the ho
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Pat Dirks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the File Systems Tech Lead at Apple in the Mac OS X Core OS group.
> We've been struggling with the question of how best to handle permissions
> on disks that are moved between systems for Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server:
> the problem is that
>Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 14:19:22 -0700
>From: Pat Dirks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[Lots of interesting, useful stuff elided -- dhw]
>ADOPTING "FOREIGN" FILESYSTEMS
>...
>Note that one interesting option might be to provide a one-time-only
>"adoption" which has no permanent effect; when the disk is
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Might the following be helpful? Or, does it exist somewhere on the net now?
>
> http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~dispatch/stupid-bsd-questions.txt
>
> If it is of any use, I'll clean it up for general consumption.
This is a very interesting a
:Not many people are aware that our userland mount_nfs(8) and umount(8)
:support the following NFS-URL-syntax:
:
:mount /some/path/to/directory@nfs-server /mntpoint
:
:This, however, seems to be BSD-specific. Neither Solaris, Linux, Irix
:...
:
:I propose to remove the '@' feature because of the a
Hi,
The system in question (3.3-stable) needs to use a large FS (ca. 40GB).
The defaults for such filesystem are ridiculous, given that it will hold
at most couple of hundred big data files. So, my question is:
* should I change the cpg (default 16) to some bigger value?
* is it safe to run prod
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:21:36AM -0400, Dennis wrote:
> Is there a way to force a Freebsd system to route to the same logican IP
> network rather than send a redirect?
Uhm, did you try this?
sysctl -w net.inet.ip.redirect=0
BTW, whether or not sending redirects, the original packet is
Hi,
I'm the File Systems Tech Lead at Apple in the Mac OS X Core OS group.
We've been struggling with the question of how best to handle permissions
on disks that are moved between systems for Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server:
the problem is that numeric IDs in inodes (or their moral equivalent)
On 05-Oct-99 Martin Blapp wrote:
> Not many people are aware that our userland mount_nfs(8) and
> umount(8)
> support the following NFS-URL-syntax:
>
> mount /some/path/to/directory@nfs-server /mntpoint
>
> This, however, seems to be BSD-specific. Neither Solaris, Linux, Irix
> or any other Ope
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Martin Blapp wrote:
> > If you want to do this, I suggest a round of releases that have mount
> > complain about the @ syntax before you kill it. POLA, you know.
> >
> > A complaint such as:
> >
> > WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path
> >
> > would be
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> If you have a crash dump, could you look at the 4 longwords starting
> at address 0xc02698c0? It seemed to be an accouting problem. Do you
> by any chance use any kld module? zalloc() calls from within a module
> do not lock the vm_zone data structure, whic
>what kind of broken bridges do you have in mind which do not pass
>broadcast traffic ? (and if the answer is FreeBSD 3.2R, yest this is a
>known bug with some cards, and i have a fix ready for commit as soon as
>i get a chance to breath).
this is not your bridge code, btw, this is our implement
At 06:12 PM 10/5/99 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> Is there a way to force a Freebsd system to route to the same logican IP
>> network rather than send a redirect?
>>
>> The situation occurs with segmented bridges where customers on the same
>> logical IP network are on separate bridge groups. When
Is there a way to force a Freebsd system to route to the same logican IP
network rather than send a redirect?
The situation occurs with segmented bridges where customers on the same
logical IP network are on separate bridge groups. When trying to reach one
another, they are getting redirects how
> If you want to do this, I suggest a round of releases that have mount
> complain about the @ syntax before you kill it. POLA, you know.
>
> A complaint such as:
>
> WARNING: path@server syntax is deprecated, use server:path
>
> would be sufficient.
A good idea, but how can one make a differe
> Is there a way to force a Freebsd system to route to the same logican IP
> network rather than send a redirect?
>
> The situation occurs with segmented bridges where customers on the same
> logical IP network are on separate bridge groups. When trying to reach one
> another, they are getting re
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Martin Blapp wrote:
> 1. Parsing a NFS-Path with directory-components which include ':'
> or '@' in their path gets difficult. To support it,
> mount_nfs(8) and umount(8) have to handle several exceptions:
>
> - nfs-server:/some@stupid/p@th
>
"Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why the hell does the clueless newbie hordes expects any answer when
> posting a message to a list without reading the list charter and
> without a single clue of how the list works is beyond me.
No one's disputing this. In fact, I agree with
Might the following be helpful? Or, does it exist somewhere on the net now?
http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~dispatch/stupid-bsd-questions.txt
If it is of any use, I'll clean it up for general consumption.
==ml
(who prefers to curse the candle, as opposed to light the darkness)
To Unsubscrib
> Last week the releases built fine, now i get the following error :
> ---
> cd /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libsl ; make install
> DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/krb SHARED=copies
> ===> lib/libacl
> cd /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libacl ; make install
> DESTDIR
Not many people are aware that our userland mount_nfs(8) and umount(8)
support the following NFS-URL-syntax:
mount /some/path/to/directory@nfs-server /mntpoint
This, however, seems to be BSD-specific. Neither Solaris, Linux, Irix
or any other Operating System support this syntax. RFC 2224 does
Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
> > There are things one can do to improve their chances of seeing the
> > message answered. For example:
>
> ... excellent advice, which everyone should follow.
>
> ... however, how the H*LL are the clueless newbie hordes supposed
> to know or learn this? As
Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
> The "old-fashioned way"? While the "look before you leap"
> philosophy, which is excellent advice, has been around Usenet since time
> immemorial, I've yet to meet or hear about anyone that's actually done
> it (when they were a newbie, that is), although people he
Last week the releases built fine, now i get the following error :
---
cd /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libsl ; make install
DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/krb SHARED=copies
===> lib/libacl
cd /usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libacl ; make install
DESTDIR=/R/stage/tree
34 matches
Mail list logo
