On Sun 1999-10-03 (07:22), Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: FTP directory listing with ftpio(3) and fetch(3)
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> BTW.. although risking to be off-topic by miles, I always liked the way
> how NetBSD's ftp(1) (since 1.4 or so) implemen
Bcc:
Subject: Re: FTP directory listing with ftpio(3) and fetch(3)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>Type 'man 3 fetch', scroll down to the BUGS section, and see the
>light. Next, scroll back up to the AUTHORS section and find out who to
>contact :)
(fetch
I've just made two very minor (cosmetic) modifications to whois(1):
1. Added -m option, which selects whois.ra.net as the whois server.
This server publishes routing policy for a large number of network
operators, and is currently run by Merit (see www.ra.net for more
details).
2. Added -q optio
As Oliver Fromme wrote ...
> Wilko Bulte wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> > As Oliver Fromme wrote ...
> > > I once programmed low-level FDC stuff under DOS, so I'm a bit
> > > familiar with this... The difference between 1.44 and 2.88 Mb
> > > floppies is that the latter use 36 sectors per t
Hi,
Since about 5 weeks I'm working on sanity checks and bug fixes
for umount(8), mount(8) and mount_xxx(8). Poul Henning told
me to mail to cvs-committers too, cause many clued people read it.
You'll find my patch and the readme for it on :
http://www.attic.ch/patches/MOUNTPATCH-CURRENT-02101
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 01:15:53PM +0300, Narvi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > That's an interesting argument on the part of a few people. The
> > > commercial UNIX I first adminned had wired down, short names fo
Wilko Bulte wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> As Oliver Fromme wrote ...
> > I once programmed low-level FDC stuff under DOS, so I'm a bit
> > familiar with this... The difference between 1.44 and 2.88 Mb
> > floppies is that the latter use 36 sectors per track and twice
> > the data rate (1
According to Bjoern Fischer:
> The sdk consists of some C headers, docs and a small example.
> You simply build a small shared library that is loaded by
> navigator. The shared library uses hooks in navigator and
> you may perform any action you like (start /usr/bin/mail,
> mutt, emacs, ...).
Wow
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 12:15:09PM +0200, Bjoern Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:09:31PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes but with the navigator, you can't even mail a link or a page...
>
> With Netscape's mail and news sdk you can use your favorite
> mail and news client
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:09:31PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
[...]
> Yes but with the navigator, you can't even mail a link or a page...
With Netscape's mail and news sdk you can use your favorite
mail and news clients transparently from navigator (like
mailto:, news:, or mail page, etc.).
T
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > This one does not resolve the controller problem either as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said.
> >
> > So, I guess dac0t0, dac0t1, ... dac3t4, will be good enough if we want
> > to be short, but anyt
[bcc'ed to committers, hackers]
My last pamphlet was sufficiently well received that I was not
scared away from sending another one, and today I have the time
and inclination to do so.
I've had a little trouble with deciding on the right distribution
of this kind of stuff, this time it is bcc'
Well, this UDMA story has finally come to an end.
I got this wierd(!) ide to test my developer version of BeOS 4.5 on the
machine. I have had no problem with BeOS on the machine before this UDMA
disk thing. Did it work?
No.
The BeOS couldn't even find the CD-ROM when I had the UDMA crap whitin
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > That's an interesting argument on the part of a few people. The
> > commercial UNIX I first adminned had wired down, short names for disks
> > (rz0, rz1, rz2, ... ). This was very nice.
>
> This one does
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked at netscape Communicator 4.7 for FreeBSD???
>
> I just installed it.
> the binary is 13234176 bytes long!!
> yes folks, that's 13 MB!
Not sure if anyone has tried this, but I run the BSDI version of 4.7.
I've been running BSDI versions of Netscape f
15 matches
Mail list logo
