On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Ron Rosson wrote:
> Thank you in replying so promptly. I look forward to seeing it get
> commited to the STABLE branch. It would be a dream come true to be able
> to see the temps internally of my servers without having to shutdown and
> take a look at it thru the bios. If it
Thank you in replying so promptly. I look forward to seeing it get
commited to the STABLE branch. It would be a dream come true to be able
to see the temps internally of my servers without having to shutdown and
take a look at it thru the bios. If it is not to much trouble or if you
need someone t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ron 'The InSaNe One'
Rosson" wrote:
>I would like to be able to monitor my system with the new ports that are
>being commited to the ports tree. Is there any time or easy way in
>implementing intpm in STABLE.
We,Nicolas and me,try to merge it to this release from
> From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 1999-06-30 15:24:46 +0200
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mbufs question/problem
> Delivered-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
> X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
> Lines: 21
>
>
> I have a
I would like to be able to monitor my system with the new ports that are
being commited to the ports tree. Is there any time or easy way in
implementing intpm in STABLE.
TIA
--
---
Ron Rosson ... and a UNIX user
> > You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive
> > package selection menu yet! :-)
>
> Let alone the Java-based GUI.
In all seriousness, given the stability of the JDK on FreeBSD *plus* the
ability to ship a FreeBSD with the JRE legally (although we don't ship
anything
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>
> > Boy, we're having fun asking you to rewrite your program. It's good training
> > for you, though, this is what it's like to be a programmer in "The Real
> > World". ;^)
>
> You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive
> package selection
Hello
I read your thread about problem with NFS v3.
I encountered this kind of problem some times ago (since FreeBSD 2.2.2)
between DEC stations running Digital Unix 3.2 ou 4.0.
When doing "ls" in a NFS mounted directory, I got something like that :
# mount -t nfs -o nfsv3 fileserver.l
Chris Piazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 12:54:32PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > > Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and
> > > some enviromental variables.
> >
> > In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we als
Daniel C. Sobral wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> Jaakko Salomaa wrote:
> > It's designed to be easy to use, so it first checks -s parameter, then
> > PKGSERVER environment variable, then the machine's toplevel domain. If the
> > toplevel domain contains only two letters it attemps to use
> >
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > There is no worm or wormlike support in the SCSI system anymore.
>
> Do I need to configure the SCSI target driver for cdrecord or
> does it just use the CD-ROM driver ? Thank you!
It uses either the cd driver, or the passthrough one. I can't remem
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > > > Anyhow, I have some changes to the worm stuff, it needs to be dealt with
> > > > > to handle modern HW, and to deal with all the possible block formats
> > > > > thats
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 12:54:32PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and
> > some enviromental variables.
>
> In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we also
> intend to throw feature upon feature request ont
> Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and
> some enviromental variables.
In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we also
intend to throw feature upon feature request onto his pile until
Jaakko ends up reproducing the Debian package manager for us
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and
> > some enviromental variables.
>
> In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we also
> intend to throw feature upon feature request onto his pile until
> J
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive
> package selection menu yet! :-)
A friend of mine is working on an X/Java version of that. I have no idea
how far he has gotten. I reviewed his notes, it looks like a great
con
The standard boot disks seem to have a problem with more than 512MB of
memory. I encountered this recently, I pulled out all but 512MB of memory
and installed. All worked perfectly and then increased the memory up to
2GB with the installed running version. All worked well.
It seems there was a is
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jaakko Salomaa wrote:
> And yes, I know what ports are. But fetching and installing packages is
> much faster than fetching the bigger source tarball and compiling it. And
> yes, I know about the remote fetching ability of pkg_add, but it is pretty
> poor in my opinion. I thi
> Boy, we're having fun asking you to rewrite your program. It's good training
> for you, though, this is what it's like to be a programmer in "The Real
> World". ;^)
You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive
package selection menu yet! :-)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe:
I've pored over -question, to no avail, so here goes.
We are trying to install FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE on a Dell PowerEdge
6300.
Said beast has a DPT SmartRAID IV controller, and 2G of memory.
We've told this machine via it's BIOS to pretend it only has 256M.
When we try an install from the floppi
Jaakko Salomaa wrote:
>
> BTW, I'm now utilizing ftpio(3) instead of my own kludge, I'll probably
> send a new message to -hackers when the new version is ready. (I'm going
> to spend a few days somewhere else.)
fetch(3) is a better choice because it allows http downloads too. Passing
a URL is
Wouldn't stackable filesystems solve this rather neatly?
--
Ben Rosengart
UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group
StarMedia Network, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jaakko Salomaa wrote:
> It's designed to be easy to use, so it first checks -s parameter, then
> PKGSERVER environment variable, then the machine's toplevel domain. If the
> toplevel domain contains only two letters it attemps to use
> ftp..freebsd.org, else it defaults to ft
Jaakko Salomaa wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> > > This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just one quick
> > > question though - why did you "roll your own" ftp I/O handling instead
> > > of simply using fetch(3) or ftpio(3)?
> >
> BTW, I'm now utilizin
Jaakko Salomaa wrote:
>
> It's designed to be easy to use, so it first checks -s parameter, then
> PKGSERVER environment variable, then the machine's toplevel domain. If the
> toplevel domain contains only two letters it attemps to use
> ftp..freebsd.org, else it defaults to ftp.freebsd.org and p
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just one quick
> > question though - why did you "roll your own" ftp I/O handling instead
> > of simply using fetch(3) or ftpio(3)?
>
> Alas, it also seems to have a "default" ftp site. I don't
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>
> > I had the idea from Debian Linux's atp-get utility, which my friend
> > praised a lot. The source tarball can be fetched from the following URL:
> > http://www.saunalahti.fi/~jsalomaa/pkg_get.tar.gz
>
> This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just o
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I had the idea from Debian Linux's atp-get utility, which my friend
> > praised a lot. The source tarball can be fetched from the following URL:
> > http://www.saunalahti.fi/~jsalomaa/pkg_get.tar.gz
>
> This is quite interesting and I'm looking a
28 matches
Mail list logo
