Re: Problem with FreeBSD

1999-09-15 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:06:59 MST, Mike Smith wrote: > > Actually, as with many such cases, the floppy disk driver turned out to > > be flakey. We resolved this via private mail. > > Driver, or drive? The BIOS is the driver at this point in time. Argh! Thanks. I meant the floppy drive. Ciao,

Re: perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread Christopher Masto
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 06:37:34PM -0400, David E. Cross wrote: > method isn't working. FreeBSD doesn't have a gethostname _system_ call, but > it does have the gethostname() library call (which uses sysctl(2)). Any > ideas how to get perl to use this? Write a small xs module? -- Christopher Ma

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread David Scheidt
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <199909151928.vaa26...@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> Oliver > Fromme writes: > : It only works on two's-complement machines, though, but I'm not > : aware of any FreeBSD port to an architecture that doesn't use > : two's-complement numbers...

Re: perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread Christopher Masto
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 06:37:34PM -0400, David E. Cross wrote: > method isn't working. FreeBSD doesn't have a gethostname _system_ call, but > it does have the gethostname() library call (which uses sysctl(2)). Any > ideas how to get perl to use this? Write a small xs module? -- Christopher M

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread David Scheidt
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Fromme >writes: > : It only works on two's-complement machines, though, but I'm not > : aware of any FreeBSD port to an architecture that doesn't use > : two's-complement numbers... > > I'm not aware of any one's-co

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > It can go in after the freeze - it's a bit late to be asking now. :) I was guessing as much :) I didn't specifically see anyone requesting for these things in -STABLE, so I didn't really pay much attention to merging these things. It makes me wonde

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
It can go in after the freeze - it's a bit late to be asking now. :) > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/dd/dd.c,v > > > > revision 1.17 > > date: 1999/06/19 19:49:32; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +25 -21

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Dan Nelson wrote: > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/dd/dd.c,v > > > revision 1.17 > date: 1999/06/19 19:49:32; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +25 -21 > Miscellaneous dd(1) changes: mainly fixing variable types (size_t, > ssize_t,

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > It can go in after the freeze - it's a bit late to be asking now. :) I was guessing as much :) I didn't specifically see anyone requesting for these things in -STABLE, so I didn't really pay much attention to merging these things. It makes me wond

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
It can go in after the freeze - it's a bit late to be asking now. :) > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/dd/dd.c,v > > > > revision 1.17 > > date: 1999/06/19 19:49:32; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +25 -21

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Dan Nelson wrote: > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/dd/dd.c,v > > revision 1.17 > date: 1999/06/19 19:49:32; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +25 -21 > Miscellaneous dd(1) changes: mainly fixing variable types (size_t, > ssize_t, of

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Warner Losh
In message <199909151928.vaa26...@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> Oliver Fromme writes: : It only works on two's-complement machines, though, but I'm not : aware of any FreeBSD port to an architecture that doesn't use : two's-complement numbers... I'm not aware of any one's-complement machine that

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Fromme writes: : It only works on two's-complement machines, though, but I'm not : aware of any FreeBSD port to an architecture that doesn't use : two's-complement numbers... I'm not aware of any one's-complement machine that was manufacture after about 1980.

Re: High Performance I/O (more)

1999-09-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Christopher Sedore wrote: > My ideas for this are a little different than what I've seen proposed thus > far, more along the lines of creating something that acts as both an event > queue and a IOCP. Ideally this would be a descriptor that could be shared > across processes

Re: High Performance I/O (more)

1999-09-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Christopher Sedore wrote: > My ideas for this are a little different than what I've seen proposed thus > far, more along the lines of creating something that acts as both an event > queue and a IOCP. Ideally this would be a descriptor that could be shared > across processes

Re: perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread David E. Cross
> Umm, you can edit /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers to configure xdm to > run say /usr/config/X (which would be stored on the local machiens hard > drive) instead of /usr/X11R6/bin/X. This is a much simpler solution. > :) (Just symlink /usr/config/X to /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_Whatever.) Simpler? It

Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd)

1999-09-15 Thread Daniel Eischen
> Thanks, I figured as much. I just thought I remember being told at one > point that gdb's thread support on FreeBSD had improved. Given a choice > between adding thread support to GDB myself and developing my application > on NT, which by the way has very good thread debugging support on MSVC6.0.

RE: perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Sep-99 David E. Cross wrote: > We have a very hetergenous environment here (even among the FreeBSD > boxes). > Each PC tends to be just a little bit different. This expecially > causes > problems since we wish to have XDM on each machine on boot and have X > on a NFS partition. TO alleviat

Re: perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread David E. Cross
> Umm, you can edit /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers to configure xdm to > run say /usr/config/X (which would be stored on the local machiens hard > drive) instead of /usr/X11R6/bin/X. This is a much simpler solution. > :) (Just symlink /usr/config/X to /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_Whatever.) Simpler? I

Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd)

1999-09-15 Thread Kip Macy
Thanks, I figured as much. I just thought I remember being told at one point that gdb's thread support on FreeBSD had improved. Given a choice between adding thread support to GDB myself and developing my application on NT, which by the way has very good thread debugging support on MSVC6.0. I think

Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd)

1999-09-15 Thread f.johan.beisser
sorry folks, i passed this on to someone who should know.. jan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:07:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Doherty To: f.johan.beisser Subject: Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd) Kip-- I'm not actually on the lists; your messa

Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd)

1999-09-15 Thread Daniel Eischen
> Thanks, I figured as much. I just thought I remember being told at one > point that gdb's thread support on FreeBSD had improved. Given a choice > between adding thread support to GDB myself and developing my application > on NT, which by the way has very good thread debugging support on MSVC6.0

Re: softupdates panic in 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread David E. Cross
> Softupdates has known bugs relating to filesystem full conditions which > I believe Kirk is working on. There isn't much you can do until then > other then either disable softupdates or work to avoid the disk-full > condition. The panic does not occur very frequently so working

Re: ping: sendto: Message too long

1999-09-15 Thread Assar Westerlund
Krzysztof Krawczyk writes: > Could someone say me, why the maximum packetsize in ping command is 8184 > (ping -s 8184)? If I want to do a bigger packetsize than this i got > message like this: Look at the sysctl variable `net.inet.raw.maxdgram'. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@fr

RE: perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread John Baldwin
On 15-Sep-99 David E. Cross wrote: > We have a very hetergenous environment here (even among the FreeBSD > boxes). > Each PC tends to be just a little bit different. This expecially > causes > problems since we wish to have XDM on each machine on boot and have X > on a NFS partition. TO allevia

Re: USB cameras

1999-09-15 Thread Nick Hibma
> A simple question: Are USB cameras supported? Is anybody working on it? No. Isochronous pipes are not supported yet, but work is underway. > Oh, btw, how long can USB be extended? Hm, the mechanical specification of the cable is confusing before coffee. I think it was 6ft / 2m. You'll notice

Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd)

1999-09-15 Thread Kip Macy
Thanks, I figured as much. I just thought I remember being told at one point that gdb's thread support on FreeBSD had improved. Given a choice between adding thread support to GDB myself and developing my application on NT, which by the way has very good thread debugging support on MSVC6.0. I thin

Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd)

1999-09-15 Thread f.johan.beisser
sorry folks, i passed this on to someone who should know.. jan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:07:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Doherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: f.johan.beisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support? (fwd) Kip-- I'

Re: ping: sendto: Message too long

1999-09-15 Thread Justin C. Walker
> From: Krzysztof Krawczyk > Date: 1999-09-15 13:12:21 -0700 > To: hack...@freebsd.org > Subject: ping: sendto: Message too long > In-reply-to: > > Delivered-to: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > X-Sender: c...@tepsa.lame.pl > X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Hi, > > Could someone say me, why the maximum pack

gdb broken on 3.3RC?

1999-09-15 Thread Kip Macy
When I run my program under ddd, press Ctrl-C to return control to gdb and then type info threads at the gdb prompt it returns nothing. When I run it under gdb on the command line and do the same as above, gdb dumps core. How should I proceed? Should I grab the source for uthreads from current?

Re: softupdates panic in 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread David E. Cross
> Softupdates has known bugs relating to filesystem full conditions which > I believe Kirk is working on. There isn't much you can do until then > other then either disable softupdates or work to avoid the disk-full > condition. The panic does not occur very frequently so workin

Re: ping: sendto: Message too long

1999-09-15 Thread Assar Westerlund
Krzysztof Krawczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could someone say me, why the maximum packetsize in ping command is 8184 > (ping -s 8184)? If I want to do a bigger packetsize than this i got > message like this: Look at the sysctl variable `net.inet.raw.maxdgram'. /assar To Unsubscribe: send

Re: How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> > > I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions = > > > which is part > > > of the ifnet struct. In FreeBsd I didn't find anything similiar to it. > > > > Sysctl functions aren't "part of the ifnet struct". You can define > > sysctls for your driver, if you wish, bu

Re: USB cameras

1999-09-15 Thread Nick Hibma
> A simple question: Are USB cameras supported? Is anybody working on it? No. Isochronous pipes are not supported yet, but work is underway. > Oh, btw, how long can USB be extended? Hm, the mechanical specification of the cable is confusing before coffee. I think it was 6ft / 2m. You'll notice

Re: How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Nate Williams
> > I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions = > > which is part > > of the ifnet struct. In FreeBsd I didn't find anything similiar to it. > > Sysctl functions aren't "part of the ifnet struct". You can define > sysctls for your driver, if you wish, but that's the

perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread David E. Cross
We have a very hetergenous environment here (even among the FreeBSD boxes). Each PC tends to be just a little bit different. This expecially causes problems since we wish to have XDM on each machine on boot and have X on a NFS partition. TO alleviate this we invented a simple Perl script to repla

Re: ping: sendto: Message too long

1999-09-15 Thread Justin C. Walker
> From: Krzysztof Krawczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 1999-09-15 13:12:21 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ping: sendto: Message too long > In-reply-to: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Hi, > > Could someone sa

gdb broken on 3.3RC?

1999-09-15 Thread Kip Macy
When I run my program under ddd, press Ctrl-C to return control to gdb and then type info threads at the gdb prompt it returns nothing. When I run it under gdb on the command line and do the same as above, gdb dumps core. How should I proceed? Should I grab the source for uthreads from current

ping: sendto: Message too long

1999-09-15 Thread Krzysztof Krawczyk
Hi, Could someone say me, why the maximum packetsize in ping command is 8184 (ping -s 8184)? If I want to do a bigger packetsize than this i got message like this: tepsa:cys:/home# ping -s 65000 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 65000 data bytes ping: sendto: Message too long ping

Re: How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Don't do this. Plain text, please. > Hi, > I need to send signals to a network interface I worte but I can't find > how. ioctl() > I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions = > which is part > of the ifnet struct. In

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Oliver Fromme
Bakul Shah wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > [...] > Let me say it another way. The bugfix should be accepted and > another PR be filed that says there needs to be a constant > defining the largest possible off_t value. Also note that > traditionally Unix does not define max values for every

perl stangeness on 3.3-RC

1999-09-15 Thread David E. Cross
We have a very hetergenous environment here (even among the FreeBSD boxes). Each PC tends to be just a little bit different. This expecially causes problems since we wish to have XDM on each machine on boot and have X on a NFS partition. TO alleviate this we invented a simple Perl script to repl

does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support?

1999-09-15 Thread Kip Macy
When I run my program under ddd, press Ctrl-C to return control to gdb and then type info threads at the gdb prompt it returns nothing. When I run it under gdb on the command line and do the same as above, gdb dumps core. How should I proceed? Should I grab the source for uthreads from current?

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Bakul Shah
> date: 1999/06/19 19:49:32; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +25 -21 > Miscellaneous dd(1) changes: mainly fixing variable types (size_t, > ssize_t, off_t, int, u_int64_t, etc.). dd(1) should now work properly > with REALLY big amounts of data. > > Should be a -stable candidate by now (3 mont

ping: sendto: Message too long

1999-09-15 Thread Krzysztof Krawczyk
Hi, Could someone say me, why the maximum packetsize in ping command is 8184 (ping -s 8184)? If I want to do a bigger packetsize than this i got message like this: tepsa:cys:/home# ping -s 65000 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 65000 data bytes ping: sendto: Message too long pin

Re: How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> > > I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions = > > > which is part > > > of the ifnet struct. In FreeBsd I didn't find anything similiar to it. > > > > Sysctl functions aren't "part of the ifnet struct". You can define > > sysctls for your driver, if you wish, b

Re: How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Nate Williams
> > I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions = > > which is part > > of the ifnet struct. In FreeBsd I didn't find anything similiar to it. > > Sysctl functions aren't "part of the ifnet struct". You can define > sysctls for your driver, if you wish, but that's th

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Oliver Fromme
Bakul Shah wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > [...] > Let me say it another way. The bugfix should be accepted and > another PR be filed that says there needs to be a constant > defining the largest possible off_t value. Also note that > traditionally Unix does not define max values for every

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Bakul Shah
> date: 1999/06/19 19:49:32; author: green; state: Exp; lines: +25 -21 > Miscellaneous dd(1) changes: mainly fixing variable types (size_t, > ssize_t, off_t, int, u_int64_t, etc.). dd(1) should now work properly > with REALLY big amounts of data. > > Should be a -stable candidate by now (3 mon

does gdb on 3.3RC have thread support?

1999-09-15 Thread Kip Macy
When I run my program under ddd, press Ctrl-C to return control to gdb and then type info threads at the gdb prompt it returns nothing. When I run it under gdb on the command line and do the same as above, gdb dumps core. How should I proceed? Should I grab the source for uthreads from current?

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 15), Bakul Shah said: > PR bin/6509 (submitted in May 1998) already has a patch to fix this > but it was rejected because off_t was assumed by the bug > fixer/submitter to be a quat (int64_t). I can't even get an IDE disk > below 2G byte easily! And we are still years awa

Re: How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Don't do this. Plain text, please. > Hi, > I need to send signals to a network interface I worte but I can't find > how. ioctl() > I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions = > which is part > of the ifnet struct. I

Re: Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 15), Bakul Shah said: > PR bin/6509 (submitted in May 1998) already has a patch to fix this > but it was rejected because off_t was assumed by the bug > fixer/submitter to be a quat (int64_t). I can't even get an IDE disk > below 2G byte easily! And we are still years aw

Re: Command-line editing [was NetWare client in -current]

1999-09-15 Thread Wes Peters
Parag Patel wrote: > > I said: > > >Anyway, command-line apps have been obsolete for years, so I guess we > >should go on and find better things to argue about. :) > > I guess people missed the ":)" so I'd better explain. > > Most computers are embedded and becoming both more ubiquitous and >

Re: High Performance I/O (more)

1999-09-15 Thread Christopher Sedore
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jayson Nordwick wrote: > I did research this weekend on high performance I/O. I looked at differerent > approaches and to me they all appear the same (I know that I will get some > flamage for this). The two most prominent models that I saw were IO > Completion Ports and

Re: kern/13075 (was: Re: aio_*)

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> > > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > The aio_* stuff (I use a custom patched version in 4.x) offers performance > > > advantages over select() with large numbers of descriptors. In terms of > > > efficiency, I don't have any trouble saturating full-duplex 100mbit link > > >

Attn AVerMedia Bt878 owners

1999-09-15 Thread Roger Hardiman
Hi, Attn AVerMedia owners of TV cards with Bt878's (sorry - not the 848 users) I've got the specs from AVerMedia which mean I can finally get the Tuner Type autoselected for your cards. If you have an AVerMedia card which is one of the newer ones with a Bt878, can you please email me. I do not

Re: Command-line editing [was NetWare client in -current]

1999-09-15 Thread Wes Peters
Parag Patel wrote: > > I said: > > >Anyway, command-line apps have been obsolete for years, so I guess we > >should go on and find better things to argue about. :) > > I guess people missed the ":)" so I'd better explain. > > Most computers are embedded and becoming both more ubiquitous and >

Re: aio_*

1999-09-15 Thread Wayne Cuddy
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Nik Clayton wrote: > What we need is people like yourself, who are having to go through the > learning curve, to document stuff as you're finding it out. It doesn't > matter if your notes are a bit rough and ready, because the next person > to use them can improve on them,

Attn AVerMedia Bt878 owners

1999-09-15 Thread Roger Hardiman
Hi, Attn AVerMedia owners of TV cards with Bt878's (sorry - not the 848 users) I've got the specs from AVerMedia which mean I can finally get the Tuner Type autoselected for your cards. If you have an AVerMedia card which is one of the newer ones with a Bt878, can you please email me. I do not h

(fwd) Re: dynamically growing ffs

1999-09-15 Thread Thomas Graichen
wouldn't this be also interesting to see for FreeBSD ? - anyone with the required skills having time to have a look at it ? t -- forwarded message -- From: der Mouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: dynamically growing ffs > Is there anything to prevent someone hacking up fsck_ffs to increase

Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Bakul Shah
PR bin/6509 (submitted in May 1998) already has a patch to fix this but it was rejected because off_t was assumed by the bug fixer/submitter to be a quat (int64_t). I can't even get an IDE disk below 2G byte easily! And we are still years away from zettabyte disks. So I don't see the point of b

Re: Problem with FreeBSD

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> > > FreeBSD write "zf_read: error". > > > > Your mfsroot floppy has a bad sector. Try a different floppy. > > Actually, as with many such cases, the floppy disk driver turned out to > be flakey. We resolved this via private mail. Driver, or drive? The BIOS is the driver at this point in time

How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Daniel Hilevich
Hi, I need to send signals to a network interface I worte but I can't find how. I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions which is part of the ifnet struct. In FreeBsd I didn't find anything similiar to it. I need to send custom directions to the interface so I can't

Re: USB cameras

1999-09-15 Thread Oliver Fromme
I think this rather belongs to -hardware... Leif Neland wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > A simple question: Are USB cameras supported? Is anybody working on it? Do you mean photo cameras (i.e. for still images) or video cameras? Those are two completely different things. The Kodak DC240 digit

How can I send signals to a network interface

1999-09-15 Thread Daniel Hilevich
Hi, I need to send signals to a network interface I worte but I can't find how. I know that in some other Bsd flavours you can use the sysctl functions which is part of the ifnet struct. In FreeBsd I didn't find anything similiar to it. I need to send custom directions to the interface so I

Re: kern/13075 (was: Re: aio_*)

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> > > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > The aio_* stuff (I use a custom patched version in 4.x) offers performance > > > advantages over select() with large numbers of descriptors. In terms of > > > efficiency, I don't have any trouble saturating full-duplex 100mbit link > > >

Re: kern/13075 (was: Re: aio_*)

1999-09-15 Thread Christopher Sedore
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > The aio_* stuff (I use a custom patched version in 4.x) offers performance > > advantages over select() with large numbers of descriptors. In terms of > > efficiency, I don't have any trouble saturating full-duplex 100mbit link > > with aio routine

Re: High Performance I/O (more)

1999-09-15 Thread Christopher Sedore
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jayson Nordwick wrote: > I did research this weekend on high performance I/O. I looked at differerent > approaches and to me they all appear the same (I know that I will get some > flamage for this). The two most prominent models that I saw were IO > Completion Ports and S

Re: kern/13075 (was: Re: aio_*)

1999-09-15 Thread Christopher Sedore
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > The aio_* stuff (I use a custom patched version in 4.x) offers performance > > advantages over select() with large numbers of descriptors. In terms of > > efficiency, I don't have any trouble saturating full-duplex 100mbit link > > with aio routin

Re: Problem with FreeBSD

1999-09-15 Thread Mike Smith
> > > FreeBSD write "zf_read: error". > > > > Your mfsroot floppy has a bad sector. Try a different floppy. > > Actually, as with many such cases, the floppy disk driver turned out to > be flakey. We resolved this via private mail. Driver, or drive? The BIOS is the driver at this point in tim

(fwd) Re: dynamically growing ffs

1999-09-15 Thread Thomas Graichen
wouldn't this be also interesting to see for FreeBSD ? - anyone with the required skills having time to have a look at it ? t -- forwarded message -- From: der Mouse Subject: Re: dynamically growing ffs > Is there anything to prevent someone hacking up fsck_ffs to increase > fs->fs_size and ev

Re: aio_*

1999-09-15 Thread Wayne Cuddy
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Nik Clayton wrote: > What we need is people like yourself, who are having to go through the > learning curve, to document stuff as you're finding it out. It doesn't > matter if your notes are a bit rough and ready, because the next person > to use them can improve on them, a

Re: USB cameras

1999-09-15 Thread Oliver Fromme
I think this rather belongs to -hardware... Leif Neland wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > A simple question: Are USB cameras supported? Is anybody working on it? Do you mean photo cameras (i.e. for still images) or video cameras? Those are two completely different things. The Kodak DC240 digita

Bug in dd seeking beyond 2G

1999-09-15 Thread Bakul Shah
PR bin/6509 (submitted in May 1998) already has a patch to fix this but it was rejected because off_t was assumed by the bug fixer/submitter to be a quat (int64_t). I can't even get an IDE disk below 2G byte easily! And we are still years away from zettabyte disks. So I don't see the point of bl

Re: Command-line editing [was NetWare client in -current]

1999-09-15 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 03:54:50PM -0700, Parag Patel wrote: > Anyway, command-line apps have been obsolete for years, so I guess we > should go on and find better things to argue about. :) Heh. So far, I've only found one GUI that I would really miss without X Windows: SWAT in netscape. -- Do

Re: Command-line editing [was NetWare client in -current]

1999-09-15 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 03:54:50PM -0700, Parag Patel wrote: > Anyway, command-line apps have been obsolete for years, so I guess we > should go on and find better things to argue about. :) Heh. So far, I've only found one GUI that I would really miss without X Windows: SWAT in netscape. -- D

Re: Problem with FreeBSD

1999-09-15 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:53:03 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > FreeBSD write "zf_read: error". > > Your mfsroot floppy has a bad sector. Try a different floppy. Actually, as with many such cases, the floppy disk driver turned out to be flakey. We resolved this via private mail. Something to kee

Re: Multiple NAT alias addresses

1999-09-15 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:14:14PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > > use_sockets yes > > > > > same_ports yes > > > > > # > > > > > # machine1 redirections > > > > > #redirect_port tcp 192.168.2.237:ssh 1.2.3.4:ssh > > > > > #redirect_port tcp 192.1

Re: Problem with FreeBSD

1999-09-15 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:53:03 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > FreeBSD write "zf_read: error". > > Your mfsroot floppy has a bad sector. Try a different floppy. Actually, as with many such cases, the floppy disk driver turned out to be flakey. We resolved this via private mail. Something to ke

Re: kern/13075 (was: Re: aio_*)

1999-09-15 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 04:40:37PM -0400, Christopher Sedore wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Jayson Nordwick wrote: > > > While reading through (at least trying to... I wish there was some sort of > > kernel documentation available, the entry fee is very high) the aio_* calls, > > I had a few

High Performance I/O (more)

1999-09-15 Thread Jayson Nordwick
I did research this weekend on high performance I/O. I looked at differerent approaches and to me they all appear the same (I know that I will get some flamage for this). The two most prominent models that I saw were IO Completion Ports and Synchronous Events (such as the Gaurav http://www.cs.ric