Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-04 Thread Wes Peters
Kherry Zamore wrote: > > I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any > modifications > at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started > staroffice. I > didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I > haven't > tried pla

[no subject]

1999-09-04 Thread Nassar Carnegie
subscribe freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org tr...@abraxis.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: "proxy" make installworld

1999-09-04 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Mike Nowlin scribbled this message on Sep 5: > I keep running into problems with file flags, missing files, etc. when I > try to do an installworld on the diskless machines (with /usr/src and > /usr/obj NFS-mounted from the server)... hmmm... I've done this before, but it's been over a year... >

Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-04 Thread Wes Peters
Kherry Zamore wrote: > > I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any modifications > at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started staroffice. I > didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I haven't > tried playing wit

No Subject

1999-09-04 Thread Nassar Carnegie
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: "proxy" make installworld

1999-09-04 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Mike Nowlin scribbled this message on Sep 5: > I keep running into problems with file flags, missing files, etc. when I > try to do an installworld on the diskless machines (with /usr/src and > /usr/obj NFS-mounted from the server)... hmmm... I've done this before, but it's been over a year... >

"proxy" make installworld

1999-09-04 Thread Mike Nowlin
I have a couple of diskless -CURRENT machines hosted off another 3.x-C box -- they're "full-featured", but very lightly loaded. I can keep the host updated fairly easily through the standard CVSUP->buildworld->installworld methods, but am having a rough time with the diskless machines... The ser

"proxy" make installworld

1999-09-04 Thread Mike Nowlin
I have a couple of diskless -CURRENT machines hosted off another 3.x-C box -- they're "full-featured", but very lightly loaded. I can keep the host updated fairly easily through the standard CVSUP->buildworld->installworld methods, but am having a rough time with the diskless machines... The se

K6 Write Combining & FreeBSD

1999-09-04 Thread Randall Hopper
Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors? Randall To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: FBSD3.3RC + UMAX astra 1220S + NCR810 => panic

1999-09-04 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
Rene de Vries wrote... > Hi, > > Today I bought a Umax 1220S scanner and tried to connect this to my FreeBSD > Stable (3.3RC) system. I added a NCR810 specially for the scanner (I don't > want such a device on the same bus as my root disk which is on an aic7890). > The kernel boots perfectly with

dumps before init?

1999-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
How does one enable dumps before init? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

K6 Write Combining & FreeBSD

1999-09-04 Thread Randall Hopper
Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors? Randall To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: UHCI / OHCI controller with no interrupt configured

1999-09-04 Thread Doug Rabson
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Nick Hibma wrote: > > In many BIOS's today you will have to switch on USB support. The > problem is to figure out whether or not this has been done. > > The irq in any case is something like 0 or 255 / -1. Is this a valid > testing method or is there a better way to see wheth

Re: FBSD3.3RC + UMAX astra 1220S + NCR810 => panic

1999-09-04 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
Rene de Vries wrote... > Hi, > > Today I bought a Umax 1220S scanner and tried to connect this to my FreeBSD > Stable (3.3RC) system. I added a NCR810 specially for the scanner (I don't > want such a device on the same bus as my root disk which is on an aic7890). > The kernel boots perfectly with

dumps before init?

1999-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
How does one enable dumps before init? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: UHCI / OHCI controller with no interrupt configured

1999-09-04 Thread Doug Rabson
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Nick Hibma wrote: > > In many BIOS's today you will have to switch on USB support. The > problem is to figure out whether or not this has been done. > > The irq in any case is something like 0 or 255 / -1. Is this a valid > testing method or is there a better way to see whet

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread David Krinsky
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 08:34:15PM +0200, Soren Schmidt (s...@freebsd.dk) wrote: > > What kindof chipset is your motherboard using ?? > Are you overclocking ?? If not what is you PCI bus clock ?? 440BX/AGP. It's an ASUS P2B-S motherboard, with a PIII-450. I'm not overclocking, so I would assum

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread David Krinsky
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 08:34:15PM +0200, Soren Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > What kindof chipset is your motherboard using ?? > Are you overclocking ?? If not what is you PCI bus clock ?? 440BX/AGP. It's an ASUS P2B-S motherboard, with a PIII-450. I'm not overclocking, so I would as

Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-04 Thread Nick Hibma
> I'd say we don't want to. Give credit where credit is due, even when > there is no lawyer in sight to force you. > > My NLG 0.02 That's 0.01 Euro, love. Nick -- e-Mail: hi...@skylink.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of th

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message <199909041834.uaa16...@freebsd.dk> Soren Schmidt writes: : What kindof chipset is your motherboard using ?? : Are you overclocking ?? If not what is you PCI bus clock ?? : : I'm pretty sure this is the same problem that haunted me with the : old driver, and if I'm not mistaken it is tim

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message <19990904125146.a...@bantha.org> David Krinsky writes: : Thanks for the suggestion, though. dd is the magic bullet in so many : situations, it's always worth a shot. :-) I don't know if cleaning the tape heads might help. Also, I've had one bad tape that wouldn't ever work, but chang

UHCI / OHCI controller with no interrupt configured

1999-09-04 Thread Nick Hibma
In many BIOS's today you will have to switch on USB support. The problem is to figure out whether or not this has been done. The irq in any case is something like 0 or 255 / -1. Is this a valid testing method or is there a better way to see whether a PCI card has been configured? Nick -- e-Mai

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems David Krinsky wrote: > > > Also, make sure that your drive is good. I had one I had to return > > because it was bad. Soren said the driver worked, and I could never > > get it working for me. The replacement worked like a charm. > > Well, it's brand-new, and I didn't get it at a gara

Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-04 Thread Nick Hibma
> I'd say we don't want to. Give credit where credit is due, even when > there is no lawyer in sight to force you. > > My NLG 0.02 That's 0.01 Euro, love. Nick -- e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Soren Schmidt writes: : What kindof chipset is your motherboard using ?? : Are you overclocking ?? If not what is you PCI bus clock ?? : : I'm pretty sure this is the same problem that haunted me with the : old driver, and if I'm not mistaken it is timing related..

Re: FBSD3.3RC + UMAX astra 1220S + NCR810 => panic

1999-09-04 Thread Randy Bush
> Today I bought a Umax 1220S scanner so did i. it did not even work on win95. after rmaing it twice, i told them to keep the piece of and went out and got a better product. randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Krinsky writes: : Thanks for the suggestion, though. dd is the magic bullet in so many : situations, it's always worth a shot. :-) I don't know if cleaning the tape heads might help. Also, I've had one bad tape that wouldn't ever work, but changing tapes se

UHCI / OHCI controller with no interrupt configured

1999-09-04 Thread Nick Hibma
In many BIOS's today you will have to switch on USB support. The problem is to figure out whether or not this has been done. The irq in any case is something like 0 or 255 / -1. Is this a valid testing method or is there a better way to see whether a PCI card has been configured? Nick -- e-Ma

FBSD3.3RC + UMAX astra 1220S + NCR810 => panic

1999-09-04 Thread Rene de Vries
Hi, Today I bought a Umax 1220S scanner and tried to connect this to my FreeBSD Stable (3.3RC) system. I added a NCR810 specially for the scanner (I don't want such a device on the same bus as my root disk which is on an aic7890). The kernel boots perfectly with both scsi adapters configured (as e

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems David Krinsky wrote: > > > Also, make sure that your drive is good. I had one I had to return > > because it was bad. Soren said the driver worked, and I could never > > get it working for me. The replacement worked like a charm. > > Well, it's brand-new, and I didn't get it at a gar

Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-04 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Oscar Bonilla wrote ... > On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote: > > This is apparently old news, but I don't recall seeing anything about it > > on the lists, and didn't hear about it until it hit Slashdot a short while > > ago. > > > > ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub

Re: FBSD3.3RC + UMAX astra 1220S + NCR810 => panic

1999-09-04 Thread Randy Bush
> Today I bought a Umax 1220S scanner so did i. it did not even work on win95. after rmaing it twice, i told them to keep the piece of and went out and got a better product. randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

FBSD3.3RC + UMAX astra 1220S + NCR810 => panic

1999-09-04 Thread Rene de Vries
Hi, Today I bought a Umax 1220S scanner and tried to connect this to my FreeBSD Stable (3.3RC) system. I added a NCR810 specially for the scanner (I don't want such a device on the same bus as my root disk which is on an aic7890). The kernel boots perfectly with both scsi adapters configured (as

sockbuf starvation solution

1999-09-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
I do need help completeing this little project. Basically, the sockbuf starvation problem can be solved by using administrative restrictions on total sockbuf size. So far, I have things almost working. The only problem is that on PF_LOCAL SOCK_STREAMS (or at least that's where it shows up) there is

Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-04 Thread Kherry Zamore
I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any modifications at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started staroffice. I didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I haven't tried playing with it yet so users can run it,

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread David Krinsky
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 11:23:32PM -0600, Warner Losh (i...@village.org) wrote: > In message <19990903233326.a...@bantha.org> David Krinsky writes: > : Any ideas? I'm quite happy to help debug this one, if you have any > : thoughts on where to go with it--I need to get backups working, and > : I'd

Re: UCB removes advertising clause

1999-09-04 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Oscar Bonilla wrote ... > On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote: > > This is apparently old news, but I don't recall seeing anything about it > > on the lists, and didn't hear about it until it hit Slashdot a short while > > ago. > > > > ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pu

sockbuf starvation solution

1999-09-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
I do need help completeing this little project. Basically, the sockbuf starvation problem can be solved by using administrative restrictions on total sockbuf size. So far, I have things almost working. The only problem is that on PF_LOCAL SOCK_STREAMS (or at least that's where it shows up) there i

Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-04 Thread Kherry Zamore
I installed Sun StarOffice 5.1 on my 4.0-CURRENT machine without any modifications at all.. Downloaded, set the ld library path, installed and started staroffice. I didn't modify _any_ files at all and it runs without a problem as root. I haven't tried playing with it yet so users can run it, bu

Re: Seagate STT8000A (ATAPI/IDE) on FreeBSD? (fwd)

1999-09-04 Thread David Krinsky
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 11:23:32PM -0600, Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Krinsky writes: > : Any ideas? I'm quite happy to help debug this one, if you have any > : thoughts on where to go with it--I need to get backups working, and > : I'd much rathe

Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-04 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:29:25PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Christopher T. Griffiths: > > also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7. > > If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on: > > It seems that we may need to edit one of the library aga

Re: Sun StarOffice51

1999-09-04 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:29:25PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Christopher T. Griffiths: > > also, I did notice that the versions of the libs had changed from 6 to 7. > > If you have a recent CURRENT or STABLE, read on: > > It seems that we may need to edit one of the library ag

Re: systat -- "The alternate system clock has died"...

1999-09-04 Thread Geoff Buckingham
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 01:43:32AM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > Hmph. Fired up systat on a recently supped 3.2-stable box (aug 30). > Typed :vm, and the screen cleared, it drew the labels, then sat there for > a few seconds, then said: > > "The alternate system clock has died, reverting t

Re: gdb and source forking

1999-09-04 Thread Doug Rabson
On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote: > I have not looked closely, but it appears that the changes to bfd to > support the solib.c changes have been quite extensive. The diff of the > .c files in bfd/ is 7000 lines long. > > I know that interacting with the FSF can be unenjoyable but gdb compiles

Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric

1999-09-04 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami (as...@freebsd.org) [990903 12:14]: > * From: Jonathan Lemon > > * hw.clockrate: 132 > > * Doing this for Pentium and better systems should be trivial. Doing > * it for 486 and lower would just add a timing loop. Doing it for SMP > * would be harde

Re: systat -- "The alternate system clock has died"...

1999-09-04 Thread Geoff Buckingham
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 01:43:32AM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > Hmph. Fired up systat on a recently supped 3.2-stable box (aug 30). > Typed :vm, and the screen cleared, it drew the labels, then sat there for > a few seconds, then said: > > "The alternate system clock has died, reverting

Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric

1999-09-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Oliver Fromme wrote: > Nick Sayer wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > > Linux generates a meric of CPU performance as a byproduct of calibrating > > a delay loop. > > It's not a metric of CPU performance. It's just a meaningless > number, and its relation to the actual performance of the > machine

Re: gdb and source forking

1999-09-04 Thread Doug Rabson
On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote: > I have not looked closely, but it appears that the changes to bfd to > support the solib.c changes have been quite extensive. The diff of the > .c files in bfd/ is 7000 lines long. > > I know that interacting with the FSF can be unenjoyable but gdb compiles

Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric

1999-09-04 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote ... > * From: Wilko Bulte > > * As Chris Costello wrote ... > > * >I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy > * > * No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath > > Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something

Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric

1999-09-04 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
* Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990903 12:14]: > * From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * hw.clockrate: 132 > > * Doing this for Pentium and better systems should be trivial. Doing > * it for 486 and lower would just add a timing loop. Doing it for SM

Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric

1999-09-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Oliver Fromme wrote: > Nick Sayer wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > > Linux generates a meric of CPU performance as a byproduct of calibrating > > a delay loop. > > It's not a metric of CPU performance. It's just a meaningless > number, and its relation to the actual performance of the > machin

Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric

1999-09-04 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote ... > * From: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * As Chris Costello wrote ... > > * >I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy > * > * No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath > > Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least