Re: Heavily loaded nfs/amd gets stuck

1999-06-20 Thread Shaun Jurrens
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 11:07:39AM -0700, Studded wrote: #> No action on this in -current for a few days, so let's try #> hackers. In response to some suggestions I tried raising the number of #> nfsiod's to 20 (the max) and increasing the sysctl cache value to 10, #> still no joy. #> Skip

Re: Remote serial gdb--status?

1999-06-20 Thread Wes Peters
Greg Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 13:45:42 -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > > Greg Lehey wrote: > >> > >> I've been away from work for several weeks, and I now find that I can > >> no longer start remote serial gdb. I am using sio0 on the debugged > >> machine side, and sio1 on the debuggin

problem fixed itself -- more FreeBSD MIDI patches and one rosegarden bugfix (was: Rosegarden 2.1-beta Sequencer: Segmentation Violation and strange SEQ_MIDIPUTC device values)

1999-06-20 Thread Juergen Lock
[Cc'd to -hackers because of the MIDI sound driver patches, i'm running this on FreeBSD 3.2-stable with Seigo TANIMURA's midi driver for serial ports and with an old Atari MSTe as serial<->midi interface...] On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 09:05:29PM +0200, I wrote: > Hi! I'm trying to use Rosegarden 2.1

inetd/tcpd...changing hosts.allow...plus a documentation issue

1999-06-20 Thread Aaron Smith
hi all, [this is all on 3.2-RELEASE] i recently had some problems getting inetd tcp wrappers to do "the right thing". i tried a sample configuration where i allowed telnet explicitly: ALL : localhost : allow telnetd : ALL : allow ALL : ALL : deny unfortunately incoming telnet was still denied.

Re: Remote serial gdb--status?

1999-06-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Friday, 18 June 1999 at 13:45:42 -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > Greg Lehey wrote: >> >> I've been away from work for several weeks, and I now find that I can >> no longer start remote serial gdb. I am using sio0 on the debugged >> machine side, and sio1 on the debugging machine side. Here are the

RE: ipfilter (was: RE: Introduction)

1999-06-20 Thread Constantine Shkolny
On Sunday, June 20, 1999 7:22 AM, Luigi Rizzo [SMTP:lu...@labinfo.iet.unipi.it] wrote: > > This means that IP filters need to grab some of IP packets, process > > them on a specialized prosessor and then re-inject them into the IP > > packet stream. That is, the filter may decide to convert the pa

Re: SMP and Celerons...

1999-06-20 Thread Pat Lynch
heh, it turns out it was the motherboard my motherboard does dual celerons just fine... (same model, Tyan Thunder 2). so its time to RMA it, sorry for the question ;) ___ Pat Lynch

Re: ipfilter (was: RE: Introduction)

1999-06-20 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> This means that IP filters need to grab some of IP packets, process > them on a specialized prosessor and then re-inject them into the IP > packet stream. That is, the filter may decide to convert the packet, > but it doesn't have it ready-to-go when it has to return. However, > it may have it re

PNPifying the 'ep' driver

1999-06-20 Thread Timo Geusch
Hi all, I sent a similar mail to -current a while ago but by the number of responses I got i believe it was the wrong forum. Please bear with me while I go about it again. Problem: One of my FreeBSD boxes is loaded nearly to capacity with ISA and PCI cards. In order to make it work at all I had to

Re: SMP and Celerons...

1999-06-20 Thread Andreas Braukmann
Hi, On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 01:03:10PM -0400, Marc Nicholas wrote: > Hmmm...I always thought there was something "broke" inside Celerons to > prevent SMP...maybe I'm wrong? Sure would be neat if you could run them > SMP... Since ca. 2 weeks I'm steadily 'beating the hell' out of this system: G