Udo Schweigert wrote:
> I'm not using m3socks, I use the standard socks5 from ports (current
> version is socks5-1.0.8). To use it (the runsocks program) with
> cvsup one has to build cvsup with dynamic linking (by building port
> net/cvsup), the precompiled package from CD-ROM and the one from
>
I want to make CDROMS - data and music. Which is the preferred drive?
What software do I use to write filesystems to the CDROM?
I also want to make some custom CD's (for listening in my car) from my largish
collection of audio CD's. What software can I use to copy the audio tracks onto
disk and
I've been away from work for several weeks, and I now find that I can
no longer start remote serial gdb. I am using sio0 on the debugged
machine side, and sio1 on the debugging machine side. Here are the
relevant dmesg outputs:
panic (debugged machine):
sio0: system console
sio0: gdb debugging
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 15:50:10 +0300, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
>
> g...@lemis.com (Greg Lehey) writes:
>
>>> You've accidentally striped subdisks on the same drive? ;--)
>>>
>>> Like Greg Lehey said, you haven't really provided enough details.
>>
>> He did provide one detail, though; th
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 22:36:49 +0300, Narvi wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 11:10:08 +0300, Narvi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
>>>
I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 11:10:08 +0300, Narvi wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> >
> >> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on
> >> the
> >> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to creat
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Christopher Sedore wrote:
> I filed a kernel bug report about this early this year. This is a bug in
> the BPF implementation on FreeBSD (at least this was the consensus of
> those who reacted when I posted about it). If you look in the gnats pages
> you'll find my report an
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I've been doing some work which caused me to want to write a simple
> > userland bridging/filtering program (don't ask ;-). The easy way to do it
>
> ok, i won't ask, just remind you that freebsd (in 2.2.8, 3.2, 4.x)
> has bridging integrated with the
g...@lemis.com (Greg Lehey) writes:
> > You've accidentally striped subdisks on the same drive? ;--)
> >
> > Like Greg Lehey said, you haven't really provided enough details.
>
> He did provide one detail, though; this is a concatenated plex, not a
> striped one.
Or he at least *thinks* it's c
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 bro...@one-eyed-alien.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been doing some work which caused me to want to write a simple
> userland bridging/filtering program (don't ask ;-). The easy way to do it
> seemed to be to use BPF to read and write the packets one each side. I
> wrote somet
Mike Smith wrote:
> > The problem is that peter is not releasing the nfs_node_hash_lock
> > when he goes to retry, creating a deadlock with himself.
> >
> > Peter, looks like a quick fix & commit to me, I'd say just go ahead
> > and do it.
>
> Peter is sic transit mundi at the
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 11:52:43 +0300, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
>
> cro...@cs.rpi.edu (David E. Cross) writes:
>
>> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
>> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
>> of 2 such units
cro...@cs.rpi.edu (David E. Cross) writes:
> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
> of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec. This seems like a
> drastic drop in performan
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 11:10:08 +0300, Narvi wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
>
>> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
>> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
>> of 2 such units performance drop
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 3:43:10 -0400, David E. Cross wrote:
> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
> of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec. This seems like a
> dras
On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at 11:03:32 +0300, Pavel Narozhniy wrote:
> "David E. Cross" wrote:
>>
>> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
>> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
>> of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 M
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
> of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec. This seems like a
> drastic drop in performan
"David E. Cross" wrote:
>
> I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
> order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
> of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec. This seems like a
> drastic drop in performance. Any ideas what
I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on the
order of 15+ Meg/second. If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec. This seems like a
drastic drop in performance. Any ideas what I am doin incorrectly?
--
David
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 06:10:42PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> Udo Schweigert wrote:
>
> > I'm using it (runsocks cvsup -P m) for a year now and it works
> > without any problems. (Since cvsup 16 the "-P m" is not needed, so
> > "runsocks cvsup" should so it).
>
> Just to make sure I understan
20 matches
Mail list logo
