Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Kelly Yancey wrote: > > I admit that they are less common than say 320x240 mode x...but they are > linear and don't require any hacking to support from applications which > would use graphics modes (unlike the unchained "modex" modes). > I absolutely agree that we should keep the ker

Re: so use sysctl (was: Re: libkvm sucks)

1999-05-17 Thread Marc Slemko
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: [...] > unf! > > part of a multithreaded ident server that i got bored with... > i'm not entirely sure it still works: Yea, that idea works, thanks. I didn't notice that the way this is done was changed in 3.x to add the sysctl option. I do wonde

forgot some stuff about sysctl: Re: libkvm sucks

1999-05-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Marc Slemko wrote: > The premise: libkvm is fatally flawed by design, and fixing it is not an > easy proposition. > > The reasoning: reading from kernel data structures without any locking has > obvious race conditions. > > This is why any identd that uses libkvm sucks and

so use sysctl (was: Re: libkvm sucks)

1999-05-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Marc Slemko wrote: > The premise: libkvm is fatally flawed by design, and fixing it is not an > easy proposition. > > The reasoning: reading from kernel data structures without any locking has > obvious race conditions. > > This is why any identd that uses libkvm sucks and

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Roger Hardiman
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > It breaks because compat22 is installing _everything_ in > > /usr/lib/compat/aout. We've reproduced this locally - compat22 is > > hosed. > Hmmm. Good thing I took that out of the default list of installation targets > then. :) > I tend to think that the compat22

do you have any bt848 hacks (eg channel sets)

1999-05-17 Thread Roger Hardiman
Hi, Do you have any bt848 driver hacks to the brooktree848.c source code you need to get the card working for you. eg audio mux changes Tuner frequency channel sets This DOES NOT include any kernel config options or any 'sysctl' options I'm looking for actual source code changes.

libkvm sucks

1999-05-17 Thread Marc Slemko
The premise: libkvm is fatally flawed by design, and fixing it is not an easy proposition. The reasoning: reading from kernel data structures without any locking has obvious race conditions. This is why any identd that uses libkvm sucks and gets into loops all the time, etc. This is why netst

Repeatable kernel panic for 3.2-RELEASE NFS server

1999-05-17 Thread David E. Cross
First, I would like to take this opportunity the thank Matt Dillon for his excellent work with NFS/TCP. Wow, way to go :) Now on to the real problem :) One of our users way able to reliably crash an NFS server 3 times today. I have since copied his program and have reliably crashed a seperate an

Re: Mosix now available under GPL

1999-05-17 Thread Mike Smith
> > http://www.mosix.cs.huji.ac.il/txt_distribution.html > > Now, who's going to port it to FreeBSD? It would help a lot if they released the original BSDI-based code as well. The porting process would be pretty heavy given the code they provide (replacements for all touched files, not even d

Mosix now available under GPL

1999-05-17 Thread Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth
http://www.mosix.cs.huji.ac.il/txt_distribution.html Now, who's going to port it to FreeBSD? STephen PS - my Seismic software code would love this -- The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor. "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could pro

Re: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Graham Wheeler wrote: > When the beta was first announced, there was a small but concerted > effort amongst readers of this list to send mail to VMWare requesting > that they consider supporting FreeBSD as a host O/S, not just a > guest O/S. So, add your voice and send them

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
>> On a slightly related note, I am currently in the process of developing >> patches to add more useful "tweaked" modes to the video driver: >> graphics 720x480, 16 colors (90x30 8x16 character cells) >> graphics 256x256, 256 colors (32x32 8x8 character cells) >> graphics 296x220, 256

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Mike Smith
> Yes, it can be extended to support all graphics modes (except mode X > :-). But, how useful will it be? The VESA 800x600 raster text mode > was a kludge for some laptop systems, so it was justifiable. But, how > about others? 1024x768 mode can contain only 128 columns if we are to > use 8-dot

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
> I think you just nailed the problem here. It requires a prohibitive >amount of effort to support modex video modes given the return. What I am >thinking about is removing the 320x240 mode (since it is impossibly >difficult to deal with)...no one is using it now so no one would be >affected. I wo

Re: Seti project / stats reset, new version available

1999-05-17 Thread Julian Elischer
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > > #define quoting(Matthew Dillon) > // This reduces the effect an idprio seti background task has on the rest > of > // the system. > > Yeah... I was going to ask just this. My users complained about > server response after starting setiathome. > > /

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> It breaks because compat22 is installing _everything_ in > /usr/lib/compat/aout. We've reproduced this locally - compat22 is > hosed. Hmmm. Good thing I took that out of the default list of installation targets then. :) I tend to think that the compat22 distro simply aged and died but nobod

RE: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Charles Randall
From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@clear.co.nz] >> http://www.connectix.com/html/connectix_virtualpc.html > > But this only runs on the Mac, right? Seems like it. I think that Jason was only commenting on the "coolness" factor when compared to VMWare. Although I haven't tried it, VMWare seems damn co

Re: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Andreas Braukmann
Hi Jason, On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 08:19:25AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 1999 01:11:40 -0500 > > It doesn't run on FreeBSD, only on Linux and Windows NT. Pity, because > > it is very neat. > I think the Connectix Virtual PC is cooler; VMware only runs on Linux > and NT because

Re: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Joe Abley
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 03:22:31PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote: > http://www.connectix.com/html/connectix_virtualpc.html But this only runs on the Mac, right? > -Original Message- > From: Jacques Vidrine [mailto:n...@nectar.cc] > Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 3:12 PM > To: Jason Thorpe > Cc

RE: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Charles Randall
http://www.connectix.com/html/connectix_virtualpc.html -Original Message- From: Jacques Vidrine [mailto:n...@nectar.cc] Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 3:12 PM To: Jason Thorpe Cc: John & Jennifer Reynolds; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware--anyone playing with it? On 17 May 19

Re: Seti project / stats reset, new version available

1999-05-17 Thread Joao Carlos Mendes Luis
#define quoting(Matthew Dillon) // This reduces the effect an idprio seti background task has on the rest of // the system. Yeah... I was going to ask just this. My users complained about server response after starting setiathome. // sysctl -w kern.quantum=2 Humm, my systems ar

Re: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Jacques Vidrine
On 17 May 1999 at 8:19, Jason Thorpe wrote: > I think the Connectix Virtual PC is cooler; VMware only runs on Linux > and NT because it requires gross hacks to redirect e.g. I/O space access. I haven't seen it... do you have a reference? Jacques Vidrine / n...@nectar.cc / nec...@freebsd.org To

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Mike Smith
> > I have a fresh installation of FreeBSD 3.2 on my > > laptop. > > What happens if you select the 2.2 compat dist during installation? It breaks because compat22 is installing _everything_ in /usr/lib/compat/aout. We've reproduced this locally - compat22 is hosed. -- \\ Sometimes you're ah

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Roger Hardiman
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I installed it both during installation and then > > again via /stand/sysinstall just to make sure. > > > > Still no luck. > > Hmmm. So much for that idea. :) Oddness.. I copyied /usr/libexec/ld.so from my 2.2.7 machine to my 3.2 machine and it all worked. bye

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I installed it both during installation and then > again via /stand/sysinstall just to make sure. > > Still no luck. Hmmm. So much for that idea. :) Oddness.. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I have a fresh installation of FreeBSD 3.2 on my > laptop. What happens if you select the 2.2 compat dist during installation? - Jordan > > I tried to install netscape 4.08 from both > ports and then as a package. > > Both times, I get the following error > > Couldn't load /usr/libexec/ld.s

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Roger Hardiman
Mike > > You will probably need the compat22 distribution for Netscape to work > correctly. I installed it both during installation and then again via /stand/sysinstall just to make sure. Still no luck. Bye Roger To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha

Re: 3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Mike Smith
> I have a fresh installation of FreeBSD 3.2 on my > laptop. > > I tried to install netscape 4.08 from both > ports and then as a package. > > Both times, I get the following error > > Couldn't load /usr/libexec/ld.so. > > > It has been suggested I need to compile XFree86 locally. > My poor la

3.2-RELEASE and netscape problem.

1999-05-17 Thread Roger Hardiman
I have a fresh installation of FreeBSD 3.2 on my laptop. I tried to install netscape 4.08 from both ports and then as a package. Both times, I get the following error Couldn't load /usr/libexec/ld.so. It has been suggested I need to compile XFree86 locally. My poor laptop will take ages to do

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Kelly Yancey
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Kelly Yancey wrote: > > I think you just nailed the problem here. It requires a prohibitive > > amount of effort to support modex video modes given the return. What I am > > thinking about is removing the 320x240 mode (since it is impossibly >

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Kelly Yancey wrote: > I think you just nailed the problem here. It requires a prohibitive > amount of effort to support modex video modes given the return. What I am > thinking about is removing the 320x240 mode (since it is impossibly > difficult to deal with)...no one is using it now s

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Kelly Yancey
On 17 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Kazutaka YOKOTA writes: > > In that sense, the support for 320x240 mode-X is minimal too. The > > driver can set up this mode, but has no knowledge or code to write to > > it. It is entirely up to the userland program to update the video > > buffer.

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
>> In that sense, the support for 320x240 mode-X is minimal too. The >> driver can set up this mode, but has no knowledge or code to write to >> it. It is entirely up to the userland program to update the video >> buffer. (And it is true that there is very little use to this mode at >> the mome

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kazutaka YOKOTA writes: > In that sense, the support for 320x240 mode-X is minimal too. The > driver can set up this mode, but has no knowledge or code to write to > it. It is entirely up to the userland program to update the video > buffer. (And it is true that there is very little use to this

Re: cylinder group and special device

1999-05-17 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Can anyone answer the following two questions for me: : :(1) Does a cylinder group in FFS have to begin at a cylinder boundary? No. The only thing that happens if it isn't is that the '# (Cyl. )' comment in the disklabel has asterixes in it. Modern hard drives use variable leng

Re: Updated: Call for Review: VoxWare/LGSND(Yes!) midi driver for serial ports

1999-05-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I now have the driver for OPL3 ready to go! Great news! - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

cylinder group and special device

1999-05-17 Thread Zhihui Zhang
Can anyone answer the following two questions for me: (1) Does a cylinder group in FFS have to begin at a cylinder boundary? (2) If we read a block via a special device name (/dev/xxx), will the block be buffered as normal file data and used when we need the block again? Thanks for any help. -

Re: fsck and large file system

1999-05-17 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Alex Le Heux writes: > > Maybe I'm completely wrong here, but didn't I read somewhere that with > > softupdates it would theoretically be possible to boot the system before > > the fsck and fsck while it's running? > > Yes.. if you make the assumptions t

Re: modex support (again)

1999-05-17 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
Sorry for not participating in your earlier discussion, I have been kept busy by my work ;-< The current VGA driver code won't do much in the graphics mode. It simply switches to a graphics mode when requested, but it has no code to actually write anything to the video buffer in the graphics mode

Re: Updated: Call for Review: VoxWare/LGSND(Yes!) midi driver for serial ports

1999-05-17 Thread Seigo TANIMURA
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Updated: Call for Review: VoxWare/LGSND(Yes!) midi driver for serial ports Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 00:07:58 -0700 Message-ID: <73643.926406...@zippy.cdrom.com> jkh> > After a week of struggle, I am pleased very much to announce jkh> > that Luigi's sound dri

Re: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Jason Thorpe
On Mon, 17 May 1999 01:11:40 -0500 Jacques Vidrine wrote: > It doesn't run on FreeBSD, only on Linux and Windows NT. Pity, because > it is very neat. I think the Connectix Virtual PC is cooler; VMware only runs on Linux and NT because it requires gross hacks to redirect e.g. I/O space acce

Wired memory "leaking"

1999-05-17 Thread amobbs
I've got a problem that my KLD is "leaking" wired memory. It's not actually growing in size, vmstat -m shows a fairly constant allocation, and certainly "high" isn't increasing. It's just that as I use it more, and more memory gets wired down, and the system becomes unusable. I've tried both usi

Re: MB86950 Support in the works?

1999-05-17 Thread Wes Peters
Warner Losh wrote: > > nIn message <373b297a.97302...@airnet.net> Kris Kirby writes: > : I was wondering if any adventurous individual has looked into writing a > : driver for the MB86950 ethernet controller. I have quite a few cards > : that use this chip and would be more than willing to acid-te

Re: MB86950 Support in the works?

1999-05-17 Thread Kris Kirby
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Yes, I've experienced sustained transfer rates in excess of 1 MBps on > a 10Base2 network, with FreeBSD 3.1 using an SMC based Kingston EtherX > (ISA PnP NE2000 clone thingamabob) in one end and a nondescript Linux > box in the other end. Two FreeBSD boxes (3.0-R and 2

assembly listing from crash

1999-05-17 Thread Dennis
What is required to get an assembly listing of the crashpoint when analyzing a crash dump? thanks, Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Seti project / stats reset, new version available

1999-05-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
Matthew Dillon wrote: > For people who have idle cpu to spare, this is a good time to start > putting those cycles to good use with the Seti project! The project > has been running a beta test for a while, but as of May 13th 1999 they > reset the stats and introduced new clients

Re: VMware--anyone playing with it?

1999-05-17 Thread Graham Wheeler
John & Jennifer Reynolds wrote: > > http://www.vmware.com > > Is anyone playing with that VMware stuff? They say they have tested > FreeBSD 2.2.8, 3.0, and 3.1 as "guest OS's" when using the linux > software (whatever that means :) ... just wondering if anybody has > messed with this. Sure woul

Re: vmapbuf (was:Which O/S routines are subject to change?)

1999-05-17 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Stan Shkolny" writes: > [...] (BTW, I found it very-very-VERY helpful > that I did it first under NT, since NT has kernel-mode debugger :-). Oh, and FreeBSD doesn't? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freeb

Re: Debugging

1999-05-17 Thread Doug Rabson
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Greg Lehey wrote: > [moved to -hackers] > > On Sunday, 16 May 1999 at 23:03:11 -0500, Mike Heffner wrote: > > > > I would like to trace the source of a panic during boot time. How do I > > compile > > the boot loader code in DEBUG mode? I tried defining DEBUG with make, but