I am having trouble with a PCMCIA chipset
I have a ISA to PCMCIA adaptor, it is made by ActionTec model no. PC-250
www.actiontec.com
the chip on it has the following information on it;
D japan
DB6082
1992 DATABOOK
1992 FMI
FUJITSU 1992
9412 E57
the avalible I/O addresses are
200h 240h 280h 2
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> Sysctl is faster than kstat once you have performed the name->oid
> lookup. There is basically nothing that kstat can do that sysctl can't
> do better and faster, apart from lookup-by-name.
Except for dynamic registration right?
--
| Matthew N. Dodd |
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 05:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
> > Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > > > Qlogic ISP
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Joe McGuckin wrote:
> for some time now, I have been unable to get a clean compile of the 'current'
> src tree.
1) Wrong forum
2) RTFMailingList
Sorry, but this is such an ignorance that you would have had to put -zero-
effort into tracking it down not to find the answer.
I
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:31:02PM -0600, Chris Costello wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> > > Can a loadable module, say a network driver register variables with
> > > sysctl ? Can sysctl itself be made a loadable module ? As for the speed,
> >
> > a.) Yes.
>
> I don't see
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 06:30:01PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Sysctl is faster than kstat once you have performed the name->oid
> > lookup. There is basically nothing that kstat can do that sysctl can't
> > do better and faster, apart from lookup-by-name.
>
> Can a loadable module, say a n
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:31:02PM -0600, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> > Can a loadable module, say a network driver register variables with
> > sysctl ? Can sysctl itself be made a loadable module ? As for the speed,
>
> a.) Yes.
I don't see any examples in
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> Can a loadable module, say a network driver register variables with
> sysctl ? Can sysctl itself be made a loadable module ? As for the speed,
a.) Yes.
b.) No - it can't be.
--
|Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|It is easier to write an incorrect pro
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 06:30:01PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> Sysctl is faster than kstat once you have performed the name->oid
> lookup. There is basically nothing that kstat can do that sysctl can't
> do better and faster, apart from lookup-by-name.
Can a loadable module, say a network drive
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > >What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
> > >too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
> > >since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
> > >I have is way too old, for exa
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> >What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
> >too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
> >since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
> >I have is way too old, for example).
> >
>
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:10:48PM -0500, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guy Middleton writes:
> : PAO says the address is 00:50:ba:a7:ff:95.
>
> Which driver does PAO use for this card?
It uses "ed"; here is the PAO version of pccard.conf:
# Generally available IO ports
i
>
> --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:52:50PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> > > I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
> > > Moreover, since it was not be
> Original Message Follows
> From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >You can add "counters" with sysctl. You can also add read/write
> >variables of any type.
>
> You can add them dynamically at runtime? How do you know which counters are
> available at a given time?
The same way yo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Roger Hardiman writes:
: #if defined (BSD)
: or #ifdef BSD
#include
BSD will be defined on BSD systems, for what it is worth.
However, these days
#ifndef linux
#endif
works just about as well and is often time more accurate in describing
what needs to happen in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jonathan M. Bresler" writes:
: if we remove the OUI check, then we are relying on the
: checksum alone. that sounds fine provided that other none
: Lninksys/dl10019c cards will fail the checksum.
:
: what do other nic cards have at those addresses
: (sc->a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guy Middleton writes:
: PAO says the address is 00:50:ba:a7:ff:95.
Which driver does PAO use for this card?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
===> f77doc
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc created for /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77do
c
cd /usr/src/gnu/lib/libgcc; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DWORLD -DNOINFO -
DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin
/make -DWORLD -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -D
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > > Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
> >
> > No, that's not correct e
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
> > Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
>
> No, that's not correct either. Here's an editted copy of what I sent to
Well,
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
> > I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
> > probably be remove
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Charles Randall wrote:
> After an unsuccessful attempt at asking this on -questions...
>
> I believe that I could work my way through the problem below if I could
> build a vanilla gcc 2.7.2.3 on FreeBSD 3.3-R.
>
> Attempting to build a fresh 2.7.2.3,
>
> 1. configure
>
As Matthew Jacob wrote ...
I'm not laughing, I think it is a bit sad.
I *do* have the Emulex docs available thru my employer. But I can't really
use them...
Wilko
> Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
> had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeB
This patch adds a ``-x'' flag to ftpd, which instructs ftpd to obtain an
exclusive lock on files it commits to disk as a result of a store operation.
This way it becomes easy to tell whether a download has finished, in case the
file needs to be copied someplace else (as in my case). I used open()/
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:52:50PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> > I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
> > Moreover, since it was not being used in tools like vmstat and xosview,
> > I thought there must be a reason.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
> I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
> probably be removed from OpenBSD as soon as the tree unlocks post 2.6.
>What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
>too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
>since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
>I have is way too old, for example).
>
>Any reason NetBSD and FreeBSD don't
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert Withrow
>writes:
> : When the card attaches it is called a Linksys and it runs with the ed driver,
> : and gives me good performance on a 100Tx network.
>
> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 14:05:07 -0700
> From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The linksys su
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 04:10:08PM -0500, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guy Middleton writes:
> : I just installed PAO, and it now works fine. Thanks for everybody's help.
>
> Looks like a good argument for removing the MAC address check in the
> linksys probe code... What
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999 11:37:42 -0800 (PST), Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The directory blocking is there for a different reason. Atomicy does not
> have much to do with it though perhaps it did at some point in the past.
Hmmm... /usr/include/ufs/ufs/dir.h states:
* A directory con
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
> had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
> the copyright was not so good. And in order to get
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guy Middleton writes:
: I just installed PAO, and it now works fine. Thanks for everybody's help.
Looks like a good argument for removing the MAC address check in the
linksys probe code... What's MAC does PAO report for this card?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send ma
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert Withrow writes:
: When the card attaches it is called a Linksys and it runs with the ed driver,
: and gives me good performance on a 100Tx network.
The linksys support in normal freebsd was added only since FreeBSD
Con. If this card uses the same linksys chi
Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
the copyright was not so good. And in order to get the technical manuals that
describe the f/w interface you have to sign an NDA.
On Thu, 4
As Matthew Jacob wrote ...
What does not help is that Emulex consider's their hardware / software
interface a trade secret. Meaning NDAs etc.
At least this is the last thing I heared.
Wilko
> We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
> fabrics. The emulex card i
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
> >
> > Well !! That's far more than the things I'm having trouble with!! I'm not
> > being able to make ONE asynchronous read. I've tried the aio functions with
> > file I/O and it worked fine, I've also tried the socket
Such an interface, for generic userland statistical gathering, need not be
[and thus should not be] implemented via a kernel-land system call.
bloat, bloat, bloat.
Chuck
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
> Original Message Follows
> From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
It seems you're missing the src distribution. It should resolve your crt0.o
and your gnumalloc problems. ...I think.
Original Message Follows
From: Charles Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After an unsuccessful attempt at asking this on -questions...
I believe that I could work my way thr
On Wed, 03 Nov 1999, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson was heard blurting out:
>
> Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
> on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
> not an option I have time to explore.
>
>
Here is what I am getting
Original Message Follows
From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>You can add "counters" with sysctl. You can also add read/write
>variables of any type.
You can add them dynamically at runtime? How do you know which counters are
available at a given time?
>One thing that puzzles me; you
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
> Moreover, since it was not being used in tools like vmstat and xosview,
> I thought there must be a reason.
>
> sysctl also seems to assume that it doesn't get called frequently.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Johan Kruger wrote:
> How can i use chat on the command line to enter a new password without
> interaction with passwd .
> For example , i want to use chat to reply on New password and Retype
> password, something like this :
Why use chat when you can use pw(8)? Exam
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 02:53:51AM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> > A user program makes a system call with this string "cpu.system" to get
> > the current value of user/system/nice time etc.
>
> How is this different from doing:
>
> # sysctl -a | grep l
How can i use chat on the command line to enter a new password without
interaction with passwd .
For example , i want to use chat to reply on New password and Retype
password, something like this :
# chat `passwd` ew passw: qwerty: etype pass: qwerty
But the above doesn't work.
begin:vcard
n:
Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
>
> Well !! That's far more than the things I'm having trouble with!! I'm not
> being able to make ONE asynchronous read. I've tried the aio functions with
> file I/O and it worked fine, I've also tried the socket I/O with read() and
> it worked fine too. But when I issu
FWIW -- I think a reasonable goal of "getting stats out of the kernel" is
that pulling data out ought to run as fast as bcopy, and it would be nice
if you didn't have to drop into a syscall. Kind of an extreme position, I
guess, but if you have ever seen the rstatd on linux eat 12% of cpu to
retu
I should point out that Simon has also been working on a DPT FC driver- I'm
not sure if this i2o OSM is part of this or not (Simon?).
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 11:04:06 -0500
From: Simon Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New i2o supp
Hi- Yes- it was a fun though short lunch.
We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
fabrics. The emulex card is popular, but nobody's written a driver for it for
FreeBSD.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Thank you for lunch a
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> > > A user program makes a system call with this string "cpu.system" to get
> > > the current value of user/system/nice time etc.
> >
> > How is this different from doi
After an unsuccessful attempt at asking this on -questions...
I believe that I could work my way through the problem below if I could
build a vanilla gcc 2.7.2.3 on FreeBSD 3.3-R.
Attempting to build a fresh 2.7.2.3,
1. configure
2. remove references to gnumalloc in Makefile and cp/Makefile
3.
Well !! That's far more than the things I'm having trouble with!! I'm not
being able to make ONE asynchronous read. I've tried the aio functions with
file I/O and it worked fine, I've also tried the socket I/O with read() and
it worked fine too. But when I issue the read to the async queue an t
I don't think kstat does the same as sysctl, at least for one thing: it
provides for a way to dynamically add counters, if there is a way to
enumerate them and userland proceses can add their own, it will make a good
performance tool. May be I won't have kstat in all my kernels, but it would
b
Matt,
Thank you for lunch at the South American resturant in
Berkeley during the FreeBSDCon.
Do we have a FibreChannel driver for FreeBSD? Ideally, I am
looking for arbitrated loop support on the emulex cards.
jmb
--
Jonathan M. Bresler FreeBSD Core Team, Postmaster
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 11:40:39AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> The bug is on the server-side, not really the client side. Many people
> have been bitten by this problem and it would be cool if someone submitted
> a patch to fix it. I will get to it eventually but I'm kinda tied u
54 matches
Mail list logo
