[Bug 209113] Heap overflow in geom ioctl handler

2025-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|g...@freebsd.org|bugmeis...@freebsd.org Reso

[Bug 209113] Heap overflow in geom ioctl handler

2016-07-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 --- Comment #4 from rday --- I think you're right, a hard limit would be better. I can't find a maximum parameter count or a maximum parameter size in the documentation though. I don't think I'm familiar enough with the system to come up wi

[Bug 209113] Heap overflow in geom ioctl handler

2016-07-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 --- Comment #3 from Xin LI --- (In reply to rday from comment #1) I don't really like the M_NOWAIT part -- shouldn't we place a hard limit on how much the userland may request instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the a

[Bug 209113] Heap overflow in geom ioctl handler

2016-07-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 Xin LI changed: What|Removed |Added CC|sect...@freebsd.org | --- Comment #2 from Xin LI --- -secteam

[Bug 209113] Heap overflow in geom ioctl handler

2016-07-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 rday changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@ryanday.net --- Comment #1 from rday

[Bug 209113] Heap overflow in geom ioctl handler

2016-05-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209113 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org -- You ar